For what it’s worth, this is a follow-up to my comments 9 May 2025. After observing the same random spikes in HR measurements on a Garmin watch I thought I trusted as I saw on the Suunto Race, I anecdotally tested the Race again (very mildly).
Basically it seems like the Garmin watch I used and the Race for me provide fairly similar HR measurements. If anything, the difference appears to be smoothing. I suppose Garmin might use a different algorithm to flatten the OHR measurement provided by the operating system, at least compared to the Suunto OHR measurement output. This is a total guess based on simple observation with no motion, periodically over a few days.
I updated to the recent 2025Q1 firmware. Maybe that is a factor? Honestly I don’t recall why I thought the watch’s OHR measurement was “wrong generally 85% of the time” because it seems solid now – at least enough for me to be comfortable using it for guidance. Which is great, I really like the watch.
Note I observed the same issue with a Coros Vertix 2S. In Coros documentation I found a reference to OHR measurement accuracy in relation to cold hands, as the blood flow changes under certain conditions and this can have an impact on OHR referencing. For the record, I live in Alaska and this is totally a plausible situation for me. It was the first I read about the idea, which makes sense. Just a thought.