@Joaquin Since you seem to be connected to the Suunto development team, I wanted to share one additional piece of feedback about the elevation profile and climb guidance - the colors.
What I find inconsistent is the coloring scheme that I suspect is based on cycling climb categories rather than the slope grade %. That may make sense for cycles because that have gears, in which case climb categories represent the amount of work, but these colors may be quite misleading for running and other similar activities. I’ve seen many examples where an easily runnable 3% uphill slope is shown in red color just because it is longer, but at the same time a fairly steep 12% grade slope can be shown as yellow just because its length is just below the threshold to make a higher grade category. That is often misleading, especially in longer distance races where even short but steep climbs are not runnable. Furthermore, by design yellow ascents can never be long because once they get longer the multiplication of distance and grade brings them into the red category.
Here is what Garmin does - when you look at the end-to-end profile, it is broken into major climbs and descents, and the colors represent the climb categories. But once you zoom in, there are a few more colors (shades) and they now represent the grade, so in a single climb you may see multiple colors to give a more exact information. Those different colors are not separate climb segments but rather visual representation of grade within a single longer climb or descent. I find that fear more usable that Suunto’s approach. Also, Garmin’s approach mostly avoids slicing rolling terrain into dozens or sometimes even hundreds of tiny short ascents, descents, and flat sections - those segments are often so short (sometimes around 100 meters) that the watch can’t even track them correctly.
