@Dan-Cantir Indeed, I changed “location access” to “Always”, and since then the weather forecast has Benn updated automatically multiple times. Thank you.

I don’t see why this is necessary (at least I would accommodate having a forecast for the last location where I opened the app), but for now it works and I don’t need to start a synchronisation from my watch anymore.

@Mff73 then it means no battery data, likely Ambit didn’t write it or it wasn’t stored

Maybe to avoid confusion, the option I’m thinking about should be called autobreak to distinguish it from autopause.

@gi0vanni I need phone and SA version, you can send me a PM, thanks.

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in Software update 2.22.60 (Only S9 Peak Pro) (HotFix):

This update brings improvements to GPS performance in a watch.

Shorter time to find GPS signal

Kind of irrevelant but FWIW my nearly 3yr old S9B has taken less than 5 seconds to acquire a GPS fix every day so far this week 😮

@deserthike20 In my experience Strava does sync negative (downhill) running segments but perhaps not negative cycling segments.

After several years of being addicted to this gimmicky, I have learned that all this stuff is good to get accustomed with certain concept as a beginner and to get very long term trend insights, but if you get too much attached, they are un-educational, preventing you to benefit from the most important gift you can get from sport: mind<->body connection.

@isazi I see it ! Perfect, thank you 🙂

@Matúš
When awake one can be “sure” to be still enough, not moving the arm, etc… When sleeping, who knows…
Hey, just my own thoughts.

@JVMT74 Kudos. That is an impressive finish time for TDS (assuming you are an amateur).

@Swaddy61 I’ve learned tips and workarounds from the forums. A bunch of people that done accept “that’s the way it is” but a bunch of people that say “they’re has to be a way”.

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos yes, I will do so. Thank you very much for your guidance!

@arnie82 it’s interesting to hear your experience, and I’m sure Suunto and Hammerhead are interested to hear your feedback on this partnership.

@Mff73 Also, considering that battery duration has considerably been enhanced with last generation of watches (S9pp < SR < SV), the number of charge cycles his more than divided by 2 compared to previous generations.

@inkognito That was it. Thanks! I removed all POI-s and than uploaded just two and they both appeared on the watch map.

Good to know to keep an eye on this until Suunto resolves it. But if this bug is still here from s9 era, that is not promising 😞

I find this time field as an extra. I don’t care if it’s small - I know it’s there if I need it, and I rarely need it to be as readable as any other data field.

If I’m going to need to know time often - like actual time, or sunset, etc. I always create a personalized sports mode where the important fields are large enough.

@Jonathan-C really interesting seeing how you’re teaching the software about the world.

Looking forward to part 2, where I’m curious to find out if you have to pre-plan the number of laps and incorporate that into your route. Spoilers!

@ChrisA you and Brad make great points and I agree with you. I particularly follow Scott Johnston’s work with Uphill athlete (and now Evolv). SJ wasn’t absolutely against HRV btw, but that current methods of measuring them aren’t reliable (as we have experienced as well).

That said, I believe the main idea of the original question is whether this measurement is inconsistent when swapping watches. They probably somewhat are if there are differences in watch sensors. I mean, we can get different results on the same watch just by switching arms.

@bobson also agree about the lag. Not sure what people expect or what they think is important. Much ado about nothing. IMO. I’d gladly accept miniscule lag if the battery lasts longer, and that is one of the tradeoffs.

@Francesco-Pagano that’s also not the latest available version (2.19.42 < 2.23.20), could that be a problem ?