Categories

  • 5k Topics
    53k Posts
    J
    @Sergei-Ladeishchikov Thank you for your confirmation! I’m glad it’s not just me screwing things up
  • 7k Topics
    92k Posts
    Sergei LadeishchikovS
    @Joaquin I’d like to revisit the issue of creating a route in offline mode on iOS. I recently ran into this, and the app generated a route in a straight line without using trails. Is it normal for the route to be generated without using trails? What should I do in this situation—for example, should I create a route using waypoints (which will result in straight lines between the waypoints)? Update: I accidentally opened the map settings and discovered that you can switch between online and offline modes. The route is calculated based on the selected mode. In offline mode, without a mobile network connection, the route is calculated using trails.
  • 351 Topics
    2k Posts
    trianstT
    Yesterday I went diving, and after importing the dive into the Suunto app, I saw that my SAC was 8.5 l/min. After transferring the JSON file to my preferred diving app, it showed 10.01 l/min instead. The Ocean also displayed 8.5 l/min. I then calculated the SAC myself using the values for pressure difference, dive time, average depth, and tank size, and I also get around 10 l/min. So now I’m wondering how the value of 8.5 l/min is calculated and why the discrepancy is so large. Could this possibly be an error in the Ocean’s calculation? It’s not about the air consumption itself — I would like to understand why the Ocean displays a different (lower) SAC value. Here is the dive data: dive time 102 min, air consumption (221 -> 112 = ) 109 bar, average depth 6.1 m, tank size 15 l. The Ocean is running the latest firmware version (2.51.28). Thank you very much in advance for your support.
  • 288 Topics
    4k Posts
    M
    Struggled with moving my app to the physical watch. Some the key issues: let not allowed on watch (ES5) variables not initialised when app initially loaded (worked OK in simulator) setText with <div id= > This lead to a surprising amount of different failure modes: watch stuck on “restore to a safe state” - requiring a hard factory reset app cannot be activated for training - toggle switches back directly training starts - watch reboots when changing to app screen app screen blank once app screen actually comes up it becomes easier to debug To debug I basically removed all code from my app and inserted it back again code block by block to pinpoint the errors. Took a fair amount of time, but now the app mostly works on the watch too… Questions - I never managed to locate a log or crash dump from the watch. Where is it? Some suggestions: Would be good if simulator and watch was following the same standard, so more bugs could be found in the simulator, or if there was a “linter” to warn of unsafe usage I have found most of my problems touched upon in the documentation, code examples or this forum, but the information is sometimes very brief and not always easy to find, maybe gather everything in the reference document and add a TOC and index My own approach is generally top-down, understand architecture, state model and data flow, build a skeleton and iteratively add detail. Documentation is a bit lacking in this high level view, it feels more like a collection of many details and example fragments. For me, the intended debug approach is not very clear, maybe add more guidance in the manual on how to use the VS Code IDE especially for debugging. But kudos for making this IDE available,
  • 119 Topics
    1k Posts
    dreamer_D
    said in Suunto Spark: I did not comment but I’m testing my Spark. So feedback post: Sound quality is really good. Build quality is very nice. They feel really premium. Not so good things: The touch is too sensitive. I have disabled by default the “one click” Audio notifications are exactly the same as without the Spark. I knew that, but I didn’t expect the latin american spanish for Spain. Metrics are not integrated with the watch. I think the S+ app should have two more options: An option to toggle on/off things like navigation audio indications, so users can decide if they want the navigation audio indications (which are very useful in several cases). For that, Suunto should implement the feature (which is still missing). An option to toggle on/off to use the metrics taken from the Spark’s pedometers in the main activity in the watch. I mean, to not have 2 activities in the app (watch and spark). Something similar that what happens when you are using a chest/arm strap. Only one activity with the much better bpm taken from the chest/armstrap, not two activities. Something similar happens here with the Spark, since you have 2 additional pedometers that are going to work a lot better than something that is taken from a watch that is in one moving arm. For someone that made the effort of buying the Spark, I see this as an important software bug that should be solved. Having 2 individual activities has not sense (at all). Ideally: Go further with a firmware update for using the pedometers of the spark for indoor/treadmill runs, if possible of course. Things like voice notes while on workout (if possible). Just those little things for making the Spark a must and a perfect companion. About the voice things. Garmin, Amazfit and since this May, now Coros are working seriously on this. This is Coros’ May update: https://eu.coros.com/stories/coros-metrics/c/may-2026 It is very interesting for several scenarios (I.E, running with gloves in winter but see Coros notes). I think the Spark have a lot of potential here and Suunto should really think in the integration as an ecosystem. There are many use cases considering also the integrated pods. There’s a lot of marketing with these things, but at the end Suunto is behind the rest and the integration thing is somehow super interesting considering Suunto has it’s own headsets.
  • Anything not related & off topic

    1k Topics
    30k Posts
    No new posts.
  • Sports Tracker apps feedback, questions, feature suggestions and issues

    31 Topics
    133 Posts
    S
    [image: 1774862540045-78712e04-50fb-484e-84b6-86e28ce395f0-immagine.png] [image: 1774862707642-dfae38c3-a3d4-4ef2-8037-9fac97d5c393-immagine.png]
  • 100 Topics
    476 Posts
    pavel.samokhaP
    No day without another new vibecoded service. This one is at least more-Suunto specific, not yet another “I made MCP server so you can connect Claude to your Suunto data” (then repeat spam post for Garmin/Coros/etc.) It’s great that people are doing various services, but seems like LLM made this so easy that people not thinking enough about the implications. Vibecode first, market second, reasoning later if ever. But yeah, already think on making paid options What’s the point of the service? What it adds in comparison with Suunto App? Majority of the users sync their Suunto Watch with Suunto App, so even if some third-party service can extract and upload watchfaces, they will likely by overwritten when user sync his watch to SA. Or if they care to change IDs then you can end up with duplicates. And I can continue with other questions, like what happens if Suunto do changes to WF API/format. Then you can break something in the watch using third-party service like this. Find out how to make custom WF? OK, same as above, the fact that you can find out, doesn’t mean it’s good - maybe Suunto is not releasing it because it’s not yet ready for general audience and risky to break the watch. All in all, for the author: good catch to reverse engineer the protocol, for ordinary users: beware.
  • Anything related to the recent announcement about Suunto’s new Digital services and Movescount Transition

    340 Topics
    5k Posts
    E
    @Christoph-Van-Laethem In here the bubble appears : https://www.suunto.com/fr-fr/Assistance/ I realized that the bubble doesn’t come on when using my main browser (Firefox), probably due to the ad blockers I added, so i use Edge only for Suunto support

Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy