@Stoke80 I would love to see what they say. I had a K3 and loved it, but went to the 1040 because I got a deal on it, but would love go back. Following. Let us all know.

@DrSilverthorn said in Course planner feature suggestion: @sky-runner this could work. Maybe the degree to which you prefer one solution vs another is tied to how obsessively you’re watching the info I think I’d prefer the configurability of a data field option, which would probably involve fewer button presses If there was a dedicated waypoint data screen and I could customize it, I’d definitely use that. But in general I don’t like Suunto’s approach of mixing navigation specific data fields with other data fields on regular data screens. I don’t like having unused data fields when navigation isn’t used. I also don’t like an idea of having a special sport customization just for the case when I use navigation. In my opinion, navigation specific data should only be visible when I use navigation and otherwise be hidden. Garmin solved that by allowing users to customize navigation specific data screens that only show up during navigation. My eyesight isn’t that great anymore so I don’t like having a lot of data fields on each data screen (4 or 5 at max), which means with only 3 data screens I can’t even afford to waste some of the space for navigation specific data fields like distance to next waypoint or ETA. I used that in the past with Suunto 9, but would definitely prefer a cleaner solution. When I used Garmin. I always enabled the “Up Next” feature, which is a dedicated data screen that shows up to 4 upcoming waypoints with their names, symbols, and remaining distances to them.

@maszop said in New SMART barometric algorithm: @wakarimasen This has nothing to do with measuring altitude itself — that’s never been a problem with Suunto. Look at the top part of the altitude graph, and you’ll see a jagged line with multiple little, sharp peaks (caused by strong wind) that add up, giving absurd ascent and descent totals. It’s a bit better since the last update, but the results are still absurd and essentially useless for any analysis. Understood. Ascent/ descent isn’t so important for me, I guess. I’m just pleased to get to the top, and know how far there is to go on the way there. My Polar watch ‘over-read’ by 10m at the summit, for comparison.

One of the coolest features is that you can nap while you are sleeping… [image: 1773069257957-d10eaa2b-f597-4830-bc22-3873adb8dc01-image.png] [image: 1773069390104-d0e60fa7-8b6c-4f8b-9d8d-001200dea361-image.png]

@shamilt1 Suunto uses something called FusedSpeed. It uses GPS and your steps to calculate your distance. So it is possible the calculation differs, especially as GPS coverage gets bad…

@Adrian.S agree on treadmill elavation gain, would be nice if one could edit it on the watch after the run, like distance but at least we have elevation gain in the app now for treadmill, so step by step.

@atoponce Yeah, I wasn’t sure if CPS allowed for a speed criteria, and didn’t want to re-read the spec so I just linked it for you. CPS is often used with another protocol CSCS (Cycling Speed and Cadence Sensor), which obviously does report speed. When you finish an indoor cycling session, you can “edit the distance” for an indoor cycling ride. I never bother to do this, but if you use it to match what you’re seeing in an app, then you might get something you’d like, assuming it takes the “distance” and works out a speed graph over the session duration. Out of curiosity, what do you expect to learn from “speed” you can’t learn with power data? I don’t know of a “FTS” Functional Threshold Speed aspect like there is FTP to make power zones. Do you think you’d use it as an alternative way to determine TSS?

@2b2bff No question about it! I’ve also been programming since early 1990s and do that for living.

I have problems with BT connection of Suunto HR belt since several months… I reported this here in different threads… others too… it would be nice if this issue would be addressed by an update!

@Mff73 In my opinion, the negative interpretation often depends on the stress level of the person reading. Firmware updates are something many of us users really look forward to, because besides fixing bugs they also bring improvements that let us enjoy our devices even more. Over the past weeks I’ve submitted several feature suggestions (like the one about customizable alarms and notifications), confirmed bugs reported by other users, and reported a few that I personally found. I also went back and read some older posts from two or three years ago, and many of the suggested features keep appearing again over time. So I’m not sure the next updates will actually resolve or improve that much. Still, as a user I hope they will, and as a fan I’m always curious and a bit impatient to see what the next update will bring.

@Tieutieu said in Climb guidance 2.0 issue - not all zoom levels are available at the end of the route (see picture): @sky-runner the only missing thing ihmo is this extra zoom level when there is waypoints . In other cases climb guidance is perfect No, it is not perfect when doing a really long distance with a lot of waypoints, and that is what the above report is about. The zooming doesn’t work correctly when at the end of the route as it may not be possible to zoom in to the desired zoom level. Imagine that you run a 100 km race and let’s say there is an aid station at 5 km before the finish and another aid station at 10 km before the finish. And let’s say there are waypoints for all aid stations. And let’s say you are just past the second from the end aid station, so basically you have 10 km to go and one more waypoint before the finish. Please see the picture at the top of the post for the illustration of what I am trying to explain. At that point it is possible to see the entire profile for the entire 100km, but the elevation profile is so compressed horizontally that it is unusable. Also it is possible to zoom just at the 2nd from the end segment of the profile - from 10km before the finish to 5km before the finish. That is good. But it is impossible to zoom into the segment that shows the last 10 km - from 10km before the finish to the finish. Instead it goes straight into the entire 100km profile. That’s what the above report is about. A similar zoom level is available at the beginning of the route but not at the end. The logic is flawed!

@Zdeněk-Hruška Thanks for the information, I sold my race 2, just before the last update from Stryd. I tested some other watches, Polar , Apple WU3 and I think I Will be going back to Suunto V2. So I hope it will work normal again

Resizing the photo didn’t work. It must be specific to certain photos and certain training sessions. The photo was 7.5 MB. I took the same photo again the next day and was then able to upload it. I’m a bit baffled. It doesn’t happen all the time, but it does occur occasionally.

@JebClydeNC Strange. I had no issues but was wearing a Race 2. Time changed and alarm worked. What phone, that is more likely the issue as time is acquired from SA.

@Tami999 thank you for the tip !

@SergioB yes you’re right, it’s there (quite small). But I can swear I didn’t see it the first time.

@Nandodiver i’m a 3-star CMAS diver. for training purposes, we dive to a maximum depth of 42 meters. they said that due to Suunto issues, their sensors were unreliable, but I really liked the Nautic S, especially its visible screen and design. thank you very much.

@Christoph-Van-Laethem In here the bubble appears : https://www.suunto.com/fr-fr/Assistance/ I realized that the bubble doesn’t come on when using my main browser (Firefox), probably due to the ad blockers I added, so i use Edge only for Suunto support

@withManish 12 s upper button could do tricks. Don’t have experience with your issue, though

I wanted to try the route planner and found a bug that makes planning impossible. In the “Outdoor” map view, forest and dirt roads are displayed as regular roads. Only after zooming out to a certain level do they appear correctly as dashed green lines. However, at that zoom level not all paths are displayed anymore. The dark map mode works exactly the opposite way. Even at the highest zoom level, forest and dirt roads are displayed correctly as dashed lines, but from the same zoom-out level they start to be drawn as regular roads. [image: 1772911649342-b7009e92-e727-4c06-959a-edb5b376f284-image.png] [image: 1772911667337-231d2f3e-6ed0-4432-b3d3-a2288c117f3c-image.png] [image: 1772911725773-ad2281ea-65e3-4c51-836c-4858e1583a3e-image.png] [image: 1772911750528-87680971-631a-4a81-a595-7d997139edeb-image.png] In Suunto Android app, the same forest and dirt roads are displayed correctly as full or dashed green lines.