@raven said in Wahoo Kickr Core 2 speed and distance: @Dwartus said in Wahoo Kickr Core 2 speed and distance: Thank you for your proposal, for that topic when I run outside with my bike, I add a Suunto “Bike POD” which provide to the watch cadence ans speed. Also, I remember that during the run the average speed and speed is given by the “Bike POD”, but at the end of the actvity, GPS data are used to give average speed and distance. Nevertheless, you understood that I didn’t connect/used this Suunto “Bike POD” for Home Trainer activity (also save “Bike POD” battery because unmount). Thanks Oops, I missed this in my last reply. If you already have a speed/cadence sensor you use outdoors, then yes try that as an additional sensor for your indoor rides and it should work. Yes ! Thanks for the hint, I didn’t think about that because actually not installed because Home Trainer period As a conclusion, the Suunto watch Race/Race S (perhaps other models) are not able to catch all the data broadcasted by Wahoo trainer, only power meter can be read (but not as a Suunto “Power POD” because not possible to calibrate it), it’s too bad Thank you

@cosme.costa That’s obvious. Sooner or later, it has to happen. Considering the age of HW V1, support is still long-lasting, and Suunto gets a thumbs up for that.

And my answer to it: Hi Bijit I think it is especially about the time spent in the different zones. I mean the Karoo is advertised to function well with the Suunto ecosystem. That works quite well with planned routes and also the Heatmaps. But in terms of training statistics (TSS, Training Load etc) it does not deliver what is advertised. I can set my Zones in the Suunto App, and I can also set my Zones on the Karoo. In my case I have set them similar on both systems. If the Karoo would put the Zones, and as mentioned, the time spent in each zone during a workout, into the fit-file, Suunto could implement the usage of those Zones in the Suunto App. That would lead to a bette training analysis in the Suunto App, as the TSS(HR), Training Load etc. would be calculated accurately in the Suunto App. Additionally, this would be the same for power zones. They can also be set in both ecosystems. But I don’t know if they are in the fit-file or not, as I do not have any gear which delivers power output. Thank you for considering to implement HR- and also Power Zones into to fit-File export. Best regards

@Elipsus said in 9PP Appreciation in 2026 / Things to fix before it's orphaned: it’s a really nice minimalist design and great functionality combo (that unfortunately doesn’t seem to exist “anywhere else” including in other brands) Yes, this has me worried enough to consider purchasing a second 9PP as a backup. I agree with you that the design and functionality are just about perfect. I doubt we’ll ever see another fully-featured, minimal, MIP-based watch like it again, from Suunto or any other brand. The Coros Apex 4 was a nice MIP surprise, but I can’t get on with their design language. and the battery life is definitely not 20 days anymore Yeah, that ship sailed when the software moved to 24/7 HR recording. When the 9PP was first released, it recorded at 10 minute intervals, which saved a ton of battery. Personally, I find the daily HR readings meaningless, so I switch it off during the day. I turn it back on at night if I want to record sleep. Seems to add a few days to the battery life.

Great news! It would be fantastic if these apps could also be launched directly in the future (not just during training). That would open up even more possibilities. But it’s a very good start

@Nikolai-Simonov If this feature can also help reduce the phone’s battery consumption, that would be amazing. Sometimes when we go deep into the forest, the phone keeps trying to search for a signal, which can drain the battery faster. I really like this feature and I hope it continues to improve. Keep up the great work with the development!

@maszop said in New SMART barometric algorithm: @wakarimasen This has nothing to do with measuring altitude itself — that’s never been a problem with Suunto. Look at the top part of the altitude graph, and you’ll see a jagged line with multiple little, sharp peaks (caused by strong wind) that add up, giving absurd ascent and descent totals. It’s a bit better since the last update, but the results are still absurd and essentially useless for any analysis. Understood. Ascent/ descent isn’t so important for me, I guess. I’m just pleased to get to the top, and know how far there is to go on the way there. My Polar watch ‘over-read’ by 10m at the summit, for comparison.

@martintrail ultra limited edition

@SuuntoPartnerTeam So will there be a curated list of user submitted watch faces from the app store? Perhaps a competition for three new user made watch faces?

@maszop I do not what I am missing, but after creating the new route offline, as you described, ie using the “free drawing” option, the Suunto app wants me to save the newly created route before it can be followed/used, either in the app itself or be synced to the watch. But when trying to save the route and pressing the button “Save”, the app shows a error message saying “No internet connection” and wont accept the “Save”, hence the new route created offline does not sync to the watch…and/or can not be used in the app for navigation. What am I missing? BR Carl

@sky-runner said in Unboxing 90th Anniversary Edition: @Freezer When the 90th anniversary edition is supposed to ship? Some people seem to already have it. Like 2 weeks ago i was able to add Vertical 2 Limited 90th anniversary to basket and pay for it in Poland smartwatch shop. I havent seen any info its gonna be send after 10th march. Not sure if I would buy it I wouldnt already got it on my hand :D. It looks cool but as Race 2 owner I dont need it. Its cool for collectors. I’ll sell my watch when Race 3 will be released and if cool enough for switch.

@2b2bff No question about it! I’ve also been programming since early 1990s and do that for living.

Thanks @duffman19 I checked the settings several times and they are both disabled. I think it’s a software issue. I already contacted Suunto bud it always takes sooooo long to get an answer. So the problem still exists. Kristof

@atoponce Wow, what an experience you had, haha! Thanks for sharing. I think from now on I’ll think twice before charging my watch in these kinds of situations.

I just gave up with all the sleep and recovery tracking and use it as a normal watch. More batterylife and no stress with useless functions that work when ever they feel like

@zhangschmidt said in My Vertical 2 Wishlist for Next Update in 2026: Any change of watch means that an HRV baseline has to be established anew That is even the case with Garmin. I guess the hardware variations are big enough that it is not meaninful to apply the baseline of an older watch to a newer one…

@CarlW If you are only interested in a straight line, you could use azimuth navigation. The compass will still show the direction to the azimuth determined from the paper map.

@Tieutieu said in Climb guidance 2.0 issue - not all zoom levels are available at the end of the route (see picture): @sky-runner the only missing thing ihmo is this extra zoom level when there is waypoints . In other cases climb guidance is perfect No, it is not perfect when doing a really long distance with a lot of waypoints, and that is what the above report is about. The zooming doesn’t work correctly when at the end of the route as it may not be possible to zoom in to the desired zoom level. Imagine that you run a 100 km race and let’s say there is an aid station at 5 km before the finish and another aid station at 10 km before the finish. And let’s say there are waypoints for all aid stations. And let’s say you are just past the second from the end aid station, so basically you have 10 km to go and one more waypoint before the finish. Please see the picture at the top of the post for the illustration of what I am trying to explain. At that point it is possible to see the entire profile for the entire 100km, but the elevation profile is so compressed horizontally that it is unusable. Also it is possible to zoom just at the 2nd from the end segment of the profile - from 10km before the finish to 5km before the finish. That is good. But it is impossible to zoom into the segment that shows the last 10 km - from 10km before the finish to the finish. Instead it goes straight into the entire 100km profile. That’s what the above report is about. A similar zoom level is available at the beginning of the route but not at the end. The logic is flawed!