@thanasis said in Each Suunto Vertical 2 Limited Edition: The most challenging thing for me is to install it as no matter how I tried it never synchs the watchface to the watch … there seems to be an issue…. on mine Race it installed flawlessly, but on the Race S of my wife we had to repeat the sync several times before succeeding

Grandissimi! Grazie per il nuovo quadrante

9 Peak Pro… ahh… 9 Peak was my first Suunto (and first sportwatch, not smartwatch). After 2 days I returned it and ordered 9 Peak Pro. Such a cool watch. I used it some time than there was discount for Suunto watches. There was bug that -40% or something was worked for Vertical 1 too (instead of older Suunto watches) plus I bought Refurbished one. I dont remember exactly price but it was like 1/2 for Refurb (came like brand new, just different box) I remember like after 24h they repaired that bug with promotion. I used Vertical 1 2 years, give my 9PP to my mom (she uses it to this day!). Moved to Race1 to try amoled, and decided to keep it, now using Race 2. That’s my Suunto story, but I’ll remember 9PP. Vertical was honestly my first watch I was so happy with (maps, so goood battery, tank build).

I see 49 (if I didn’t miscount) watchfaces in the Suuntoplus Store. (I did have a Suunto Race connected before, and still shown as a watch that I could switch to, so maybe that also has some influence.) This, in ref. to the Ocean connection not showing the Race 2 watchface in the store.

@Giorgio60 said in Will OpenSuuntoPlus be coming to Suunto Run?: @raven Personalmente non sono minimamente d’acordo! Sono nuovo del mondo Suunto e non ho speso 240 Euro per poi spenderne altre 490 per il Race2. Molte altre case produttrici danno accesso al loro market di applicazioni, campi dati e quadranti. Basta solamente fare una cernita dei widget, allenamenti e altre cose e magari metterle a pagamento per il Suunto Run. Ma blindare un orologio solo con le applicazioni volute mi sembra esagerato, e se fosse così, credo che sia esagerato anche il prezzo del Run. Altri orologi di base, di marche ben conosciute, hanno questa funzionalità. Per il momento resterò sicuramente con suunto Run, ma per gli allenamenti e i Coach utilizzerò i miei orologi di altre marche, che le offrono gratis. Non credo che questa sia una buona politica di marketing (IMHO). Grazie No, you misunderstand. The idea is not you spend 490 after spending 240, but instead if you had done research, you’d spend the 490 instead of the 240 if the Suunto+ functionality was something you needed. It’s not that you’re supposed to buy two watches but instead the watch that meets your needs. Note I wasn’t the one who made the decision on what features Run was not going to get. I’m simply making a guess at what Suunto was thinking. They want the Run at an entry price point, and Race at a higher point with more features. What features do you leave off the Run to accomplish this? If the Run and Race have the exact same features, then they should have the same price and there’s no need for them both to exist. I do think with Suunto now encouraging more people to make S+ apps it’s weird the entry model cannot run them. If it was a “base feature” then that’s more encouragement for more people to make apps. Anyway, perhaps Suunto will change their minds and add on the capability to run S+ apps from the Run, but given the Run is a separate OS, it’s not simply “putting back” something they took away but instead re-engineering the feature for that OS. Finally, if you think the Run is overpriced, then what watch would you prefer instead? Perhaps Suunto was not the best fit for you to begin with.

@Prenj Ok thank you it’s a shame

My Wishlist: bring back stress monitoring during the day and body battery (resources) using HRV add mindfulness features more tiles than one consider bringing apps (not plugins to workouts)

@kemetter Please consider the following purely for informational purposes. As I was particularly curious about the Suunto web GPX export. The web presentation is actually very well done. The GPX export differs from what I expected See attachments: Suunto_route.gpx Suunto_navtrk.gpx The Suunto GPX export and a comparable copy as a GPX navtrk file. The original GPX file was manually edited for this purpose using Notepad++. The GPX navrrk copy therefore so do not contain any trackpoint timestamps. A few GPX WPTs have been added with a Garmin-compatible sym. One of these GPX WPTs also contains an operational web link. The GPX WPT list is not unnecessarily cluttered with turn instructions. See also the presentation in the Cruiser desktop version. [image: 1773675623877-suunto-manual-edit-gpx-navtrk-image.png] Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Will you also add the ability to create custom widgets/apps?

Why are you taking off your watch? ‍️

@Nigel-Taylor-0 Just completed a tempo run. Pre-run screen said 60% and 32hrs activity tracking. Run lasted 32 minutes and it used 2% battery…dropped another 1% 20 minutes after so I’d reckon it probably used about 2.5%, so I’m getting around 5% battery drop per hour with these settings. Better battery performance than my last run- I think being too knackered to be fiddling with the watch and constantly checking the screen helped!

@Nikolai-Simonov If this feature can also help reduce the phone’s battery consumption, that would be amazing. Sometimes when we go deep into the forest, the phone keeps trying to search for a signal, which can drain the battery faster. I really like this feature and I hope it continues to improve. Keep up the great work with the development!

@runomatic said in Suunto and Concept 2 indoor rowing: I just did a quick test with ErgSync. I can either connect the iOS app to the rowing machine or ErgSync to the watch. Both don’t work at the same time. Is that right? Then I rowed 500m for the test. The PM5 shows 500m, while the watch shows 620m. Conclusion: Well, it’s not quite there yet. But it’s a good start! Correct. The PM5 only has one bluetooth connection, so using it for either the watch or an app (ErgData, EXR, etc.) means it is not available for the other one. I don’t know if this is possible, but if the watch could “rebroadcast” the signal (like some non-Suunto watches can broadcast HR), then in theory one could connect PM5 to watch, then watch to an app. Otherwise, you’d need to petition Concept2 to put out a new monitor that supports dual-bluetooth connections. As for the watch showing 620m vs 500m, if the watch is using the internal accelerometers for pace (rather than a connection to the PM5) then that would explain it. Suunto always overestimates. I just did a 6km row a bit ago and Suunto thought it was 6.88km. Note you can edit distance in the session record.

@zhangschmidt I know, I was just telling that if you want autolap on the base sports not to switch it on/off to create custom for training sessions with runna and turn it off. I don’t see much point in having auto lap and also runna suggested laps (intervals or whatever). At the end you can get the per km laps in the app

@Nordic_Panda today i am charging, it worked from 100% to 11% for 11days with all 24/7 tracking and notifications, and i recorded around 5hour of gps activity during this 11 days. Thats for my Race 2.

@ckrook said in Can’t connect to gps out of nowhere: I live in Sweden so I’m quite positive that I am not victim to such spoofing. Right, and you can also check GNSS signal with phone or other device. Looks like you might want to send it to service, especially if it is still under warranty.

@Egika said in Creation of new sports modes: @MikeC30 no need to delete a custom sport mode. Just remove anyone from the shortlist of recently used (standard) sport modes. Thank you. You are right. It seems the list can have 20 sports (custom or not). If the list shows 20 sports you can not create new ones. If the list shows 15 sports you can create 5