Thank you so much. You did an amazing job designing everything—it all looks great.

@rémiP Thanks. This seems problematic. Is there any reason for this behavior @suuntopartnerteam?

@stavrogin - Third party own the data that is displayed on their imported workouts on Suunto, for TP there’s this ER idea to add the step counter, feel free to vote for it. https://peaksware.uservoice.com/forums/106657-trainingpeaks-customer-feedback/suggestions/46005451-interval-counter-on-suunto-s-structured-workouts Adding to my previous post, after disabling the auto lap, you can setup your own screens to see avg numbers for whatever metric you want and it’ll be for that step of the workout. But definitely you cannot see what step you’re on with TP workouts, until TP implements above idea. On your question about undoing a manual lap, it’s not possible, and when doing a manual lap while executing a workout from TP or any other place, it’ll skip the current step. This is by design and cannot be altered. With that said, Training Peaks has the best screen for executing structured works, the only missing piece is the step count in my opinion

Ldive A lot of us have had problems with the app and bluetooth sync, Somehow it looks related to language settings on the Nautic and phone, i’m putting all in english and had problems with my phone when in Dutch. After setting all on english, sync works flawless. So make sure they match. Start sync and the app should give you a green checkmark almost instantly when the Nautic is near and switched on.

@sky-runner Tested today and multiple normal routes were synced during same activity. SV2 and Android, but some firmware and app versions ahead for testing. At least some hope…

@jjorgemoura I decided that ZoneSense isn’t useful for me so I now use Coros armband most of the time. Only when I do intervals I wear Suunto HR sensor. But otherwise Coros armband works very well with Suunto watches. The reason ZoneSense doesn’t work for me is because detected aerobic and anaerobic thresholds are super conservative (like sometimes 20-30 beats lower) compared to all other methods I used including Training Peaks aerobic decoupling, Garmin LTHR test, etc. If I followed ZoneSense zones I’d end up training way too easy. Sometimes it tells me that my anaerobic threshold is roughly between my zones Z1 and Z2.

A special price combination between the Suunto Vertical 2 and the Coospo HW9 creates a high-level set with excellent value for money. You get maximum reliability in reading your workouts without having to spend a fortune on sensors from more expensive brands. I explain why this pair works so well and what guarantees the accuracy you are looking for: Why this pair is reliable. Arm Optical Sensor Accuracy: The Coospo HW9 uses a modern optical sensor that detects blood flow in the forearm or bicep. It is a region with much less interference from sudden movements and tremors than the wrist, which eliminates those “peaks” or false drops in heart rate. Shooting Reading Speed (Intervals): While the wrist sensors of any watch suffer from a delay (lag) in understanding that your intensity has increased in shooting workouts, the HW9 responds almost in real time. It is the closest you will get to the accuracy of a chest strap, but with the comfort of a wristband. Supreme Battery Savings: The Suunto Vertical 2 is already famous for its monstrous battery. When pairing the Coospo HW9, the watch turns off the rear green wrist reading LEDs. This drastically reduces the watch’s energy consumption during workouts, further extending its battery life on trails and ultras. Suunto’s Bluetooth protocol talks very well with Coospo chips. Once paired, the chance of signal drop during the run is practically zero. I used Polar for a long time and I don’t spend with them anymore.

@Pigeon101 i had the same problem. but its like they say. just tap on the message and it disapears.

@duffman19 as someone who works with motors all the time, this is kinda difficult to stay away from magnets.

Here is the photo of the other watch I found on eBay. [image: 1782430445459-5681d8dd-d3d3-4f45-9151-e77c3eec8da0-image.jpeg]

I have now some more realistic numbers. I did a reset last week on Monday and then charged it up to 100%. Lowest setting for the screen, always connected to the mobile and some 4 hours activity with Stryd Pod and Polar H10 Some notifications, always on HR & O2 sensor, sleep tracking and the usual stuff. Sleep mode from 10pm to 6am. Today now, after exact 9 days I still have 37% battery life. That’s very OK for me as this will result in 14 days with activity and nearly all features except always on display. I had a Fenix 8 47mm before and the latest firmware there gave me some 9-10 days estimation after charging, but in real life with activities it dropped to about 7-8 days If now some of the already posted bugs (mainly the BT issue with powermeters on stopping, Wahoo Kickr Speed is not shown/recorded, sometimes HR lock and drops with wrist sensor) are fixed, I am VERY happy

I’ve introduced a new setting for user weight. While reading from the watch user weight value appeared to work, it was causing issues when starting the SuuntoPlus app with any non-default rider position.

@Nikolai-Simonov yes I built a custom interval workout because I wanted to use navigation at the same time. If I use the built in intervals I cannot use navigation (this is known Suunto functionality)

@2b2bff said: Offline 2b2bff SILVER MEMBERS about 17 hours ago @Woodster said: Let me know how I can send over diagnostics It is explained in the opening post of the thread? Race S Yes it’s in there ta buddy - sent Suunto account details via chat. For me the freezing issue is very likely a faulty garbage-collection issue with a SuuntoPlus app I wrote leading to RAM pressure, can easily reproduce and send logs over so that a firmware update can isolate any app issues from the actual watch.

@domucki 1- no need to start an actitivy, but you have to be on the start screen, I’m doing dual recording with my watch and HH just because I want those Suunto badges

@larrybbaker Thank you a lot!

@thailon I made one for my race. Haven’t tried it, but could fit for Vertical as well: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:7108194

@outdoorman, et al. – What I’ve noticed is that… Race 2 unpaired from iPhone & powered down Re-paired, synced, etc. with no sticky notifications Went for run this morning (first activity since re-pairing) and sticky notifications are back, even though no phone with me during run; activity saved post-run before getting in range of phone for sync, notifications, etc. Others’ experiences the same or similar? Debating whether or not to unpair/re-pair with phone as it seems like quite the hassle just to avoid the stickiness. Regardless, I hope Suunto has seen this thread or been otherwise made aware of the issue and has a fix with next update.

@Eric-0 Interesting use case that I had not contemplated in design… ahead/behind in current setup is built on a “Count_Threedigits”-format - which would mean that it allows three digits (also negative). So it will count to -999/999. In simulator it will then display 000 until values goes back in range - assuming the same will be displayed on watch. Reason being that a “normal” display of time would steal to much space and force the use of a smaller font. I also do believe that I had to go with the “Count_Threedigits”-format as all time based formats (duration) seemed not willing to display negative numbers (time). As for your second bullet - I am trying to keep the displayed data to a minimum, prioritizing large fonts in clear contrasts; hence a bit reluctant to add more data fields. But out of curiosity - would you base the expected finish time on the extrapolation of the pace so far OR the planned overall pace?