@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos Possibly. I haven’t used the Garmin 840 in a long time, so maybe this feature is available in more expensive models or has been introduced in an update.

@sky-runner this could work. Maybe the degree to which you prefer one solution vs another is tied to how obsessively you’re watching the info I think I’d prefer the configurability of a data field option, which would probably involve fewer button presses. @mich-heller now that you mention this, I may have seen it flash up on the screen. But it was very quick and easy to miss.

@Nandodiver said in In Backcountry skiing it sucks!!!: @Brad_Olwin 220 minus age that’s the official method largely used for more than 30 years More recently in 2023 some endurance athletes start using the “Nes formula” 220 minus age: 220 - 60 = 160 bpm Nes formula: 211 - (0.64 × 60) = 211 - 38.4 ≈ 173 bpm Most of those formulas are poor, it does not matter how long they have been used. Typically the subjects the formulas are based on are sedentary or do not exercise much. Second, max HR is highly genetically determined and variable. For me the formulas give numbers that would severely negatively impact my training. Max HR should be determined by training if possible. There have been many posts here and I see on Apple forums where individuals are exercising for 60 min or more in Z5.

@Adrian.S agree on treadmill elavation gain, would be nice if one could edit it on the watch after the run, like distance but at least we have elevation gain in the app now for treadmill, so step by step.

@Nandodiver i’m a 3-star CMAS diver. for training purposes, we dive to a maximum depth of 42 meters. they said that due to Suunto issues, their sensors were unreliable, but I really liked the Nautic S, especially its visible screen and design. thank you very much.

@EzioAuditore said in Race 2 accuracy: @Finnjf After 2 runs with the Vertical 2 I can confirm that while the difference is not that prominant it still is a bit more close to what I’ve known with other watches. And the GPS track looks so freaking good - aligned with where I ran almost in centimeters. This is of course with the weather being sunny these past 2 days. I’ll run tomorrow again with the Race 2 on a nice weather and compare. That perfectly matches the behavior I observed with the Race 2 in my tests. For me, the tracks from the Vertical 1 are also cleaner.

@Mff73 In my opinion, the negative interpretation often depends on the stress level of the person reading. Firmware updates are something many of us users really look forward to, because besides fixing bugs they also bring improvements that let us enjoy our devices even more. Over the past weeks I’ve submitted several feature suggestions (like the one about customizable alarms and notifications), confirmed bugs reported by other users, and reported a few that I personally found. I also went back and read some older posts from two or three years ago, and many of the suggested features keep appearing again over time. So I’m not sure the next updates will actually resolve or improve that much. Still, as a user I hope they will, and as a fan I’m always curious and a bit impatient to see what the next update will bring.

@Squirrel Thank you! So I will charge it inside from now on.

What’s absolutely infuriating is that when the Vertical is mounted on the handlebars and my heart rate is being measured with a chest strap, and I move 10 meters away from my bike or kick scooter, the Bluetooth connection drops and isn’t re-established. So, when I’m taking photos, I just have to move a bit further away from the watch.

@Zdeněk-Hruška Thanks for the information, I sold my race 2, just before the last update from Stryd. I tested some other watches, Polar , Apple WU3 and I think I Will be going back to Suunto V2. So I hope it will work normal again

Your watch might be tracking naps incorrectly if your RHR isn’t updated to match your current fitness.

Suunto please look into this. Give an option to turn off buzz on connect maybe? I’m getting a bunch on my new PP9 and seem to have no reason for them. Supper wasn’t helpful

@sky-runner oh you are right! sorry, my bad, I thought there was an app for segments Hope you get some answers!

@Ray-de-Jager I did pair again after the update… and dived. But now it has forgotten the POD after deep sleep. @voigas Yes, the POD must have pressure to turn on. The EON pairs auto, always (this time also)… I stille use the EON as a backup (which turned out to be a good decision on this dive). It is just a software bug i the Nautic… either in loading config or in re-scan for the POSs after turned on if the POD is in the config - and if the POD is not present then give a Warning POD not found! (This might be good if someone has forgot to turn on the air on, also!) I guess that it will be solved soon…

Hey everyone! Glad to announce that Live Groups is finally in the early preview stage, and you can try it out right now. You don’t even need the latest version to get started. Group setup can be done entirely through the web interface. Here is all you need to do: Connect your Suunto account in the app. Confirm your email via your web profile (don’t worry, I won’t send any spam). Create a group and manually add your partners. You can also invite people via an invite link, but that’s currently only available in the TestFlight version. You able to add to group any user with linked Suunto account The link to watch the group live will look like this: live.athletica.one/live/+group-name I’ve recorded a short walkthrough video to show how it all works: https://drive.proton.me/urls/8RA2GZJHFC#3SfMbzrSV8sR And quick demo how it looks for spectators: https://drive.proton.me/urls/0NXMP4BV1R#zxaE0CLPdcwh Since this feature is in early access, I would be REALLY grateful for any feedback! Let me know how it works for you or your club.

@herlas Thanks a lot for your hint. Found and happy now. Have a good weekend

@Christoph-Van-Laethem In here the bubble appears : https://www.suunto.com/fr-fr/Assistance/ I realized that the bubble doesn’t come on when using my main browser (Firefox), probably due to the ad blockers I added, so i use Edge only for Suunto support

@pavel.samokha said in Sports Tracker on Apple Watch: app crashes when taking a break while following a route: I transmitted it to developers Thanks Pavel

Apologies if this isn’t the right topic to be posting this issue but it is certainly pertinent to the use of external HR sensors with the Suunto Run. Putting aside the issues i have had with the Coros armband which i have posted about in that specific topic i have also experienced issues when using a chest strap. The HR graph normally looks absolutely fine as expected but i am usually given a different max heart rate in the run summary. [image: 1772494841112-screenshot_2026-02-22-18-21-23-970_com.stt.android.suunto.jpg] [image: 1772494883386-screenshot_2026-02-22-18-21-44-133_com.stt.android.suunto.jpg] This example is from a run where i chucked in three sprints and as the graph shows my heart rate doesn’t go above 180 which is inline with what i expect for the effort. With a chest strap the Heart rate summary seems to always be different to the graph. What’s odd is when using a chest strap, which works perfectly with my other watches, i get this max heart rate discrepancy and the synced data in Strava will show a mix of the correct max heart rate which is reflected in the Suunto produced graph or it will show what i’m sure is the incorrect max heart figure as produced in the Suunto app summary. There seems to be something going on here with the relationship between watch and external sensors and how the data is all displayed within the app. Is this something seen before on Suunto or unique to how they process the data? My experience with Suunto only extends to the use of the Suunto Run having used Garmin for years.

@Philip A €100 watch can display many metrics, but that doesn’t mean the data quality is comparable. More numbers do not necessarily mean better measurement. We don’t know exactly which computational models Suunto uses on the Vertical 1. Sleep and HRV algorithms are strongly tied to the hardware, especially to the OHR sensor and signal quality. The Vertical 2 uses different hardware and a different optical heart rate sensor. It is plausible that any algorithmic evolutions are designed around the newer sensor and are not backward compatible with the Vertical 1. For this reason, realistically, it is difficult to expect major new implementations on the V1. Future developments are more likely to focus on the newer hardware platform. The price of the device is not the decisive factor. The hardware architecture is. EDIT: From the photos, the Suunto Ocean sensor appears to be the same as the one in the Vertical 1, and the Ocean does report deep, REM, and light sleep stages. So, in theory, the Vertical could inherit those features. That said, I may be oversimplifying. Even if the hardware looks similar, firmware architecture, signal processing, and model calibration can differ significantly between devices.