French reviewer Jerome from blog cardio gps has published a video during utmb in which he talks about the brands he has met and their future products. About Suunto he mentions a run 2 and a srs3

@sky-runner how frustrating. Reliability is the number item no matter what. If you are in the mountains and the watch fails, its very frustrating and problematic imo. Sure, important to always have a back up gps unit with you but still. I haven’t had any issues with my watches during long outings but it does concern me.

@elbee said: 6 crashes in 2 years is way too much. I only had 1 in just over one and a halve year. Obviously it happened in a race. Once in a race, within weeks of having the watch. Another two or three times during tracking and two times on holiday while charging and once while sleeping that I described in another topic…

@johann.fuehrer right. New we start over at the beginning: The energy saving display only cannot display more data than what is available. It cannot be configured. To show the needed data, it is totally possibly to use the full wake mode. One has to decide between energy saving or a lot of information. I was now referring to the statement that not a single watch face could display the required data.

@Sascha-Domres If you sync with the mobile first, the GPS satellite data should be updated as well. The you wait until the arrow goes green, that should work also.

@johann.fuehrer for me the soft reset after charging doesn’t help with battery run time. But it certainly helps with Resources. Will keep doing it…

My favorite hardware since 2023. I can’t stand wearing anything else on my wrist. A piece of art. I can’t recall any major issues. They just do what they’re supposed to, but don’t expect any smart lifestyle features. Love it.

@raven While I would never use “pause and resume later” (and in fact I almost never pause my watch at all), I do agree that there is a lot of value in recording non-performance fun activities, and I see how stitching multiple separate sessions together into a larger activity is appealing to a lot of people. For starters, there is a growing tendency to share such fun non-performance activities on Strava, posting with a bunch of photos. I kind of enjoy when others share that. For example, someone can go explore a city while traveling and take a lunch break in the middle. Sharing that as a single activity on Strava is much better than spamming everyone with multiple short activities. Personally I just keep the watch running, sometimes even when I go into a store, and then I let Strava automatically remove all non-moving parts. But I can see how pausing and resuming later would make more sense to many people.

How long do you wait before taking action in the “This is taking longer than expected” loop?

@Tony-Monteiro said: @elbee I think we all hope having a new firmware just to stop the battery drain… For functionnality, the Race is not anymore a priority for suunto. And the Race is a good watch for this price. So, just pray for a battery fix I don’t pray for the battery fix (I think I can mitigate that problem) I pray for the bluetooth connection lost fix. But, als we all know, praying doesn’t solve anything. Suunto isn’t working on a fix. (And neither for the battery problem. They actually think it doesn’t exist). And there are some other minor bugs te be fixed. But I don’t need any new functionality. From the last update, the more fine grained alarm settings where welcome. Trackmode is useless (and I train on a track at my athletics club every week). But I’m definitely not eager to install a new firmware for my race s (if there will be any) given the large number of people complaining about reboots and crashes after the latest firmware of the race 2/vertical 2.

@Egika ah - I understand, my misunderstanding as I use it a bit different. For me raise to wake on configuration uses 6-7% battery a day (Vertical 2). This was the best I could get (OX measurement off, 24h HR on). That gives me without training about two weeks. Then after each charging I need to do the soft reset, otherwise battery-drain is awful.

Hi, exercise today without any problems Sw. 2.56.18 Android 6.12.7 [image: 1788189629900-1000003530.jpg]

@Squirrel completly forgot about that one, indeed

@sindavide My polar oh1+ and polar h9 and my stryd looses connection. Suunto support confirmed from the logs, the devices disconnected/connected several times until it didn’t connect anymore and the stryd was not to blame (don’t know how they came to that conclusion)

@Kevin-Major said: @André-Faria No need to bog them down with another comment. In my previous comment I linked to another section of the forum, and someone replied to the effect of “yeah, they just don’t care.” Yes, a random user replied to you saying that they “do not care” and you trust that information as if it was an official response

@herlas I wonder if that works outside of swimming activities. I seem to remember to have gaps in the FIT file for running when the sensor disconnects for a couple of seconds…

@Francesco-Pagano said: @raven I appreciate how confidently you can say what I didn’t do. If you look at my graph you will see 40 minutes of steady pace / effort. I am not even skeptical about the AeT value reported - that would still have little value to ny training - but rather about the fact that ZS shows I’m still doing aerobic training when my effort increases (also shown in the graph). Right, that steady pace at the start looks to be around 5:50/km and you reported you go above your aerobic threshold these days at 6:00/km Quoting you: “ My aerobic runs used to be around 5:30 min/km below 145 bpm, now I’m well above that heart rate at 6:00 min/km. Today after 40 minutes of another miserably slow run with elevated HR” Given your own reporting, that chart and info didn’t look like an easy warm up effort to me but instead an effort over threshold. ZoneSense requires a lighter effort in the first ten minutes. However, I admit may have read the chart wrong though or misunderstood you. If aerobic threshold (AeT) = 162 bpm, and Anaerobic threshold (AnT) typically sits 10–20 bpm higher than AeT, then an estimate of that would be: 172–182 bpm. Then max HR is higher than that. If all if that sounds right, then perhaps ZoneSense is correct. However, note an effort below AeT typically should pass a “talk test,” being able to speak whole sentences comfortably, without gasping for breath.

@Egika I confirm ios