@atoponce said in Software Update 2.48.16 (2025 November Rain release):
@dankcushions I took over moderating the sub after this point (an interesting story actually) and have been actively removing obvious AI bot comments and posts. If any still remain, report them and they’ll show up in the mod queue, from which I can handle them from there.
thanks! you know when i was writing that post i tried to scan the front page for AI comments and couldn’t find any, so it appears to be working - nice job!
@soisan well, since it’s not a use case for me I didn’t see much sense in trying, but if it’s working, you might help @Olaf-Gottschalk in creating a better Hyrox experience with his Suunto with your experience in creating multisports sportsmodes with multiple running sessions in it He seems quite unhappy with his Suuntos, telling from most of his posts.
@James-Alexander does not mean you get problems, but if Suunto defines it as as sport it is hard to explain that you operate the device outside of its specifications. Or other way around, if you get problems, then everybody will get back to Suunto for replacement and so…
It’s like showing video recording with mobile phone in the sea in comercials but there is no warranty coverage whatsoever for water ingress… Not that anybody would do such a thing…
@Bigb0zz it’s not an issue to fix, but a design decision. The time would only fit if the font size of the data fields was made smaller. You may rearrange your data fields to avoid fields in the top row, which interfere with the time display.
@Horizontal_2 I agree it’s probably not a real issue to worry about the level at which to recharge. BTW the battery warranty is for one year (and the 300 cycles only if they come earlier).
@MarkusG Ok, so getting another belt (other brand) won’t solve the issue then? It seems like I’ll have to settle with wrist HR until Suunto fixes this. Disappointing.
@VoiGAS I assume that the issue is something like that. However, under the assumption that GPS is accurate, especially multi band which I used and is supposed to be very accurate, I would think that step count could probably be corrected by a better algorithm (assuming occasional measurements would miss a step, measure double air time or some other artifact).
@TED77 But generally, the number itself doesn’t matter, nor do these types of comparisons.
If the trend or graph is more or less the same in both tools, the difference in numerical values can simply be ignored.
@MrCUBS
This is a known issue from Suunto 7, but it’s probably a problem with this brand…
https://forum.suunto.com/topic/12061/pool-swimming-records-lanes-very-inaccurately?_=1766388071024
I’m also having this problem. Basically, nothing from Suunto plus is syncing. Guides, watch faces, apps, etc., are not syncing for me. It’s super annoying when you’re about to sync some workouts before heading out and basic functionality is missing.
@jjpaz I am not 100 % sure if it SA or the watch f/w. Some people reported that they downgraded their watches to a previous f/w and the problem went away. Regardless, it is something that Suunto should fix.
@sky-runner said in It's 2024 - Anyone Still Training Only With An Ambit?:
It was more accurate than most watches at the time a decade ago, but compared to modern watches with dual-frequency GNSS, A3P accuracy is mediocre.
Can’t disagree, but I still like them
@Ecki-D. I think your guess is correct, it probably won’t work technically. It’s kind of a shame because you have to consider navigation or live trekking… Thanks for your feedback
