@johann.fuehrer for me the soft reset after charging doesn’t help with battery run time. But it certainly helps with Resources. Will keep doing it…

@OutdoorMan this is what Suunto said in their Instagram post today. Talking about “new products” [image: 1787768296289-1000016750.png]

@2b2bff said: @pbanon said: I posted about it a few weeks ago and people lost their minds about how idiotic they thought the feature was. I think you misunderstood something there. It is not idiotic, but there are just different use cases. Coming from Garmin and expecting something to be there is one thing. Saying it is the most basic thing is another. Garmin will auto save a paused activity after some time. That is why resume later is essential if you have a longer break. Suunto does not. You can have an activity in pause till the battery dies. So, resume later isn’t that essential anymore. Correct if I am wrong, but if an activity is in pause, it will still use more battery than in regular watch mode no? For me it is a nice feature, but not something I would die for. I also criticize garmin for having that on watches and not on edge computers. But again it is a nice thing but not to die for ,for me.

Maybe, they could fix the firmware just to get live tracking app functional again.

@Brad_Olwin I always run 2-3 days after races. Only for all-out Marathons, I take two weeks off. My HR is not really influenced by these races. It is not more than the usual ±4 bpms during easy runs at aerobic LT. Of course my legs are tired and the muscular effort feels way higher for the pace but HR is the same for the speed that I run. I would be then not able to run for long time at my LT but due to fatigue. HR is then still in the expected corridor for that pace. Only experienced strong deviations of LT HR at return to sport after stronger infections like COVID and always the first 3 days of winter training camp on the canarien islands. There my body is always completely overwhelmed by the sudden 25°C temperature difference. SZ though told me so many times, I would be way above or below my threshold even though RPE, HR, and pace was exactly as expected. During the training camp SZ always told me that my Real-Time effort should be way higher. No way that I could ever run under that sudden higher temps at that HR which was close to my 1k all-out HR. Real-Time effort does not work at all for me, while average reported thresholds over more than hundred activities come close.

@André-Faria It is hard to claim warranty for this. The watch restarts randomly. My seller says: the fault did not appear.

@Łukasz-Szmigiel Of course - no rush, and appreciate you are doing this voluntarily. I can always roughly convert speeds in my head - mph is roughly double m/s. By the way, it’s a Vertical 2 watch. And thanks again for the app!

Hello, same issue here on my Suunto Race 2 (firmware 2.56.18]), three swim sessions in a row now where the saved distance ends up way lower than what I actually swam, plus garbled interval durations like others are seeing. One thing that might help, the corrupted “total_timer_time” values in my .fit export aren’t random, they’re always just above 2,147,483.648s ==> exactly 2^31 ms. Classic 32-bit overflow ? Subtract that and the durations line up perfectly with the good lengths, so the data’s still there, just wrapping wrong somewhere. Already emailed support with a sample file.

@Nandodiver you can easily test this above water as compasses next to eachother will pull the compass off.

@sky-runner I asked again

@isazi Unfortunately, it isn’t. It happens randomly. If I were able to reproduce it, I’d get back to you or direct to support email. Thank you for your willingness to help.

@Thorlap71 said: @Danny-poleg Before trying to get my watch replaced because of reboots, do you think I should try to revert my watch back to 2.48.16 firmware which is the only previous version available in my “Select OTA pkg”. Is this a reasonable thing to do? Hello. I downgraded and no more reboot. It usually rebooted3-4 times a days, at rest as well as during activity. Regard

@Tieutieu Battery drain: Same here

@raven While I would never use “pause and resume later” (and in fact I almost never pause my watch at all), I do agree that there is a lot of value in recording non-performance fun activities, and I see how stitching multiple separate sessions together into a larger activity is appealing to a lot of people. For starters, there is a growing tendency to share such fun non-performance activities on Strava, posting with a bunch of photos. I kind of enjoy when others share that. For example, someone can go explore a city while traveling and take a lunch break in the middle. Sharing that as a single activity on Strava is much better than spamming everyone with multiple short activities. Personally I just keep the watch running, sometimes even when I go into a store, and then I let Strava automatically remove all non-moving parts. But I can see how pausing and resuming later would make more sense to many people.

@Goatee Suunto reached out to me via email asking for more information (watch serial number, app version, etc.). I sent them the deets, so I’ll see where things go from there. Hopefully we can isolate the bug and get it fixed.

Why Suunto, why… Today, a new bug with the watch face. You didn’t correct the previous bugs with the watch face either, and today a new bug appeared on the watch. And this morning I didn’t get the morning report again. I didn’t get the morning report yesterday either.

@duffman19 So I tried first with a short stretching activity. Delete from SA, log out of SA, login again, resync and it showed the activity again. However. doing so with my long run, seems to not resync although it’s still on the watch (at least showing on the watch. I noticed. Daily HR, steps, resources are all in SA including the activity time. But GPS and activity stats are not. Would be great to ad Fit/json manualy Back into SA. That’s possible? Is it possible json and fit files are deleted if you uninstal SA?? Would be an explanation I can’t find them on my phone anymore.

@johann.fuehrer Sorry to hear that. It’s really annoying when the record of an activity is not complete. I really hope as well, that Suunto will find a solution to this (soon).

@Egika said: I ever wondered why anyone would like to know their step count. It must have been some good marketing from whoever came up with this… I looked into the history of “step count” and asking some people I know who use that metric, and I think a few things came together to make it popular. First was the “10000 steps” idea made by a Japanese marketing firm years ago which I think people liked as being an easy number to remember, and it was promoted as a universal thing (compare with tracking active calories, where people of different weights like need different targets). https://www.nuhs.edu/debunking-the-10000-step-myth-figuring-out-what-actually-matters/ It also resonates with some people as some of their “natural activity counts” towards it, so walking around the house, etc. gets one somewhat toward the goal then they just need to “finish their steps.” I still see it ideally as more of a “training wheels” metric and think at least tracking active calories is better (so other activities like cycling and yoga “count better” despite not having many steps, as opposed to Polar’s system that assigns “step equivalents” to encourage non-walking activity). And Suunto puts steps and calories on the same Daily Health page so I can see someone new to fitness and Suunto thinking “need steps” eventually learning to use calories instead.