@EzioAuditore and once again it must be remembered that the GPS data collection of the Race 2 is very good, the problem comes later with the software processing of the information to calculate the distance to be displayed.

@Gilles-D. said: But with almost 20 GB left on my Watch, it does not gives credit to your assumption You confuse storage and memory - these are two distinctly different things. The watch has 32 GiB of storage but only 32 MiB of memory plus a few more MiB on the SoC. But anyway, I don’t think this is a memory issue. This to me seems like a race condition - software developers will understand what I mean. A race condition is when two concurrent CPU threads race each other when one is trying to mutate or delete some resources in a conflicting way, which may lead to an unexpected result. This is more likely in a multi-core CPU. These issues are notoriously difficult to reproduce and debug. They may happen only one time out of thousand or one time out of million.

Scusate ma non capisco il voto negativo!!!

Same here. I updated to firmware 1.0.4.3, but I can’t find any release notes. Looks like it might just be a bug fix and stability update.

@2b2bff said: @stromdiddily there is no universal “This is a workout file, deal with it watch” format. If you are pushing a workout to Garmin, you define the steps. If you push the workout to Suunto, you define a SuuntoPlus Guide. I don’t know how Coros or Apple Watch does handle it. So, Training Peaks - or any other platform for that matter - has to include the respective framework for each brand individually… The other way around, if you read the finished activity from the watch, there is a format that has been widely adopted: Garmin FIT files. I see, this makes sense…thank you

Experiencing exactly the same issue

@withManish On iOS there is rungap for datamigration. And I use strava and intervals.icu. It collects data from multiple sources (I had different brands in the past). But most importantly, data of 5 or 10 years ago hardly has any relevance. But I’m no hardcore data collector.

@cosme.costa said: Rearding the OFF ROUTE alerts when you are on track, check what I said. Is the route created with SA or imported? I think I’ve seen it both ways - both when it is created in SA and when it is imported. This has never happened before but started happening regularly after the last update. What the new implementation doesn’t take into the account that the map may not be accurate enough, so it may think you are off route because the trail on the map is slightly off from the real trail.

Hopefully they’re able to fix it soon. It feels like with every update they just introduce more problems. Currently still experiencing the auto-update bug (can’t disable it essentially), and now the battery bug has gotten even worse.

@Squirrel thank you!

@Łukasz-Szmigiel The ones I used didn’t have those tags and have been around for years, so they’re probably directly from Suunto.

@Stefano-M64 darn it, package got lost somewhere… still waiting

@Highlands said in Suunto Vertical 1 – A Few Questions About the Future + Questions About the Vertical 2 and a Comparison with the Coros Nomad / the New Vertix 2026: @dreamer_ I hope they put a sapphire crystal on R2S. About this, I think my wife’s 46mm Run could fit a 1.4 inches screen. Perhaps they could fit that screen aize in the Race 2 S playing with the bezels and making you think the watch is not that “S” but something comparable to a Fenix 8 47mm . That simple change would make a lot of noise for marketing in my opinion and very likely much better sales (just for that)

@baaaa said: It’s disappointing that you’re aware of the issues but aren’t addressing them. This is not correct. Suunto devices and services, like any complex products, have many issues and areas for improvement, while resources are always limited. That’s why issues have to be prioritized and cannot all be addressed at once. Every user naturally feels that their own issues and requests are the most important, and that’s understandable. However, the bigger picture often looks different. @baaaa said: your company, but… Sadly, it’s not my company, only my employer. If it were my company, many things would probably be different. @baaaa said: it seems to me that your users who report bugs should be worth their weight in gold, and you should provide them with a simple and convenient tool for reporting bugs and suggesting new features. Instead, they have to go to some glitchy forum It sounds like you’re looking for official customer support channels. Those can be found at suunto.com. This is a community forum, not an official support or feedback channel. If someone is answering here they do it in their free time, not on duty. @baaaa said: search for relevant threads Yes, that’s the only practical way to keep the forum in a decent state. If everyone posted their own rant in arbitrary topics, the forum would quickly become a mess, making it even harder to find information and identify recurring issues. @baaaa said: wait for a moderator to approve their post… Unfortunately, that’s the only way to deal with spam. Users who have built up some reputation can post immediately, but newcomers need to wait for their messages to be approved.

@sky-runner You’re right… ! I see it similarly… it is certainly very difficult not to overload the Maps… POI like water points would certainly be useful on larger zoom levels… But they don’t care about trash cans at all…

@maszop sometimes you realise at the moment to download maps and … Yeah, otherwise this is just a discussion.

@matram pm me with your GitHub name, I’ll add you to my S+ skill repo. I’ve already done the digging.