@duffman19 Thanks for your comment.
Yes, I take the AIâs results with a grain of salt. The thing is, what it indicates aligns very closely with my feelings and what Iâve seen in Race 2.
Itâs clear that nowadays "sport/smart"watch users are more concerned with the accuracy of the optical sensor, clean tracks, health features and watchfaces, rather than the absolute precision of GPS metrics like they were a few years ago. DC_Rainmaker himself no longer shows distance comparisons in his reviews to test GPS accuracy between watches, only images of the tracks to see if they are clean.
We now take for granted that this data has reached an incredible level of accuracy, that all brands are there, and people are looking for other things.
In my case, itâs a bit of âoccupational hazardâ and a desire to investigate further and learn during the process.
Maybe with more activities the GPS+Acelerometer twin will be more aligned with my Vertical and RaceS data. Iâve been using Race 2 only for two weeks now. Weâll see how evolves.
Hope you find this thread interesting
