@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in General Feedback after 2 months with my new Ambit 3 Peak: @Droro there is one , and with IOS , provided you have latest version and a phone with you (duh) you can create in 1-2min a route from prev workout and send it to the watch . I guess we are talking here again about other watches than ambit 3, right ? Because I just tested the very last iOS version 1.7 which doesn’t solve anything about the concerns I shared above.

@Siro84 said in Workout edit/create support for Ambit 3: @Brad_Olwin Do you have an idea when you will implement that feature in the suunto app and will there be a transfer function from movescount to suunto app (I got quite a lot structured interval workouts). Thank you As was stated before, structured workouts are the Pandora’s box here. I don’t implement any features, I am like you, a participant in the forum and when the call for moderators came I answered. Neither I nor anyone else on this forum can answer the question regarding complex intervals. Personally, I think the effort to implement this feature on the Ambits was difficult and the hearsay that has been batted around the forum is that far few users took advantage of the feature. Speaking for myself, I do quite a few complex intervals with my coaching group but I would not set them up in the watch as there are too many variables that change the times and so, I would nearly always be at the wrong place in a complex interval. I just use my lap button and know the zones I want to hit or distances or paces. Much simpler. So I can see both sides of this issue. I am satisfied with the current interval status.

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos said in Strava sync issue - moving time not calculated: I hear you. There will be a change locally next week to how it was before. This change makes things even worse since the distance still does not match Suunto. The result on Strava is now slower pace. For example, my run today was Suunto: 4.08 miles, 36:51 Duration, Pace 9:01/mi Strava (uncorrected): 4.06 miles, 36:51 MT, Pace 9:04/mi, Elapsed Time: 36:51 Strava (corrected): 4.08 miles, 34:01 MT, Pace 8:20/mi, Elapsed Time: 36:51 Strava (reverted): 4.06, 36:52 mt, Pace 9:04/mi, Elapsed Time: 36:51 The previous implementation for Strava (uncorrected) brought the distance down a little but also brought the moving time down a little (discussed before), but then pace typically matched which is preferred. Selecting Correct Distance in Strava kills moving time and was to be avoided, Hopefully we all at least go back to what it was, but soon it all get’s straighten out. The expected behavior is for Suunto and Strava to Match initially (both distance and time (Suunto Duration and Strava Moving time). Seams like this was an attempt to do half that. If I correct distance, Moving time should not change.

There is nothing preventing you from doing what you want. At the earliest in 1.5 years you may be impacted but at this time there is no issue. What the future actually will bring for A3 is not clear.

@mfischer01 Yes, I want that as well (as software developer, I could do sort-out something)

@General_Witt said in S9 Baro Wishlist: @stromdiddily Exactly, I cannot understand why the breadcrumb is mandatory and not automatically deactivated for all indoor sports, like indoor cycling. It has discouraged me from creating custom sport modes, I still use the factory ones that have data fields I’m not interested in. Yeah, the UX was clearly designed by someone who wasn’t a heavy user of previous models of Suunto watches and not an endurance athlete themselve. I’d guess one reason is that breadcrumbs screen provides access to navigation features like compass and POIs, and even if your activity doesn’t normally use GPS it might still need navigation features. Second, there isn’t really a good distinction between indoor and outdoor sports in Spartan and S9. The GPS mode used to be a part of sport configuration in earlier models, and you could setup your sport with GPS off. But in latest models GPS mode is moved out from sport to battery mode, so in theory you can go to battery mode in any sport, even treadmill, and create a custom battery mode with GPS on. I think whether navigation is on by default should be a part of custom sport configuration - that would make sense. Similarly the default GPS mode should still be a part of sport customization, and that battery mode should come up by default when starting that sport mode.

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos thank you for your time

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos No… still there…

Maybe the same issue. It hits the Suunto.app and SportsTracker too.

@Alexander-Rosón import the gpx file? Put it on the phone, tap it and suunto app should open it , then select if you want it on the watch ?

@richirichi … most of all, from my point of view … without MC on PC we will not be able to change any settings of Ambit2, basic data, view of the screens and so on … at that point the Ambit2 becomes totally useless.

@jsuarez no its backend change/fix. for some reason the fit file does not contain the new intervals after the first one. So it’s going to get fixed and no update of the app is needed.

Thanks !

FYI - I wrote to Suunto with the diagram that is in one of my posts further up in the thread. I had a first response that said it was one of their aims to make customisable feature that suits customers needs (I’m paraphrasing what they wrote to make more sense) and it indicated that she would like to pass this onto the technical team. I obviously said yes, but please also come back (attempting a dialogue). I got a response to say that this had been discussed with the technical team and what I sent was very helpful in having a constructive discussion on it. She also repeated that they hope in the future to have a comfortable (? maybe that means customisable or just useful) feature for all Suunto users. At this stage, I’m not sure what more I can do other than nag. Is it worth others emailing in to highlight this is something they want? Is this something @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos or someone else with a Suunto connection could enquire to see if they think it is realistic or bin-worthy? I don’t know…

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos @sartoric thank you guys. For me Suunto doesn’t have competition in sport monitoring. You can have data of near all and based on a lot of sport types. Adding few features like that in the SA (basicaly show more data already known by Suunto) could be a powerful entry level to the daily activity bands market, and a dangerous alternative too, for people who at this point doesn’t plan to buy a Suunto watch.

@daveancell Beta Powa !

@sartoric said in Android 3.56 Generic Comments: @Audaxjoe You can uninstall the app then reinstall select clean data from the Android settings > apps > SA menu (this could change based on Android version) Thank you, I cleared the data and all is good now.

@suzzlo Agree

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos @Jouko-from-Suunto has writen that too some weeks ago. Pictures should be there. @Jouko-from-Suunto said in Movescount can now connect to suunto app: @Mff73 photoes should come through the new connection

@jacovdbosch it should but it can fail. If you are using movescount thay i see try to set the profile to auto

HI, I had an apple watch 4 yes i agree the watch was really good but the iphone has so many issues that i went back to android,and as we know apple dont like to share much with android. I have a fossil sport and i tested this with my suunto to see how mnay it was adding and well the fossil sport is the same really it adds steps why sat at my desk and drivig,its not as sensitive as the suunto but still adds a few,the fitbit i had also is the same it will add steps when sat at desk and driving.