On the watch: I just installed this app on my iPhone and on the Apple Watch. I am a premium user too. When I start a workout on the watch: the fields with distance ‘km’ stay at 0.00 km on the watch during all the activity. The fields with the heartbeat all stay at 0. The fields with average speed ‘km/h’ are correct and show my actual speed. Strange. On the phone: When I synchronise the workout with the phone I can see all the data correctly speed, bpm, and distance are all correct. So the problem is only on the watch. @Izual_Rebirth: Is that the same behaviour you have?

@Audaxjoe said in No more weather in my location (City) it shows district now.: England is a pretty big place That is hilarious! And it is really strange reading about the different experiences here. My own example has gone from poor weather data (extremely localized, but far away) to pretty darn good with the last android app version; which in my case now uses region data. I live in a small village. About 10 km southeast from this place, as the crow flies, lies an even smaller village which in itself is positioned 5 km south of a small town. That tiny ‘sleeper-village’ (population ca 1000) is where Suunto used to retrieve the weather data from. Since my village lies at 96 metres above sea level, the other village at 35 metres, there is a large lake seperating us and they have a high Horst (raised fault block; block mountain) immediately to their east side, the different microclimates often meant a several degrees centigrade difference. Rain, wind, fog etc also diverged all too often. But now, with the weather data pertaining to “Skåne län” [Scania County], I couldn’t be happier. Comparing the screen of my personal weather station with the Suunto Race S is almost spooky! The temperature, the humidity, the air quality… [I should underline that I have a good temperature/humidity sensor encased in a large homebuilt Gill multiple-plate radiation shield]. [image: 1763023015577-1000009684.png] [image: 1763023069758-1000009679.png] [image: 1763023112568-1000009680.png] [image: 1763023131924-1000009681.png] [image: 1763023158230-1000009682.png]

@Ian-Beveridge Instead of replacing the Polar strap I decided to buy the CooSpo HZ9 rechargeable chest sensor combined with a new strap. Total cost including postage 22€. This strap gives 0.14 KOhm for both electrodes and for the month I’ve been using it there has been only one single glitch when the strap had worked itself a little bit loose. Otherwise it works really well for HRV data at high intensity workout levels. Unlike the previous CooSpo strap it wont allow me to swap the sensor for the Polar one so I’ve dumped the Polar and will be returning it to Polar for repair or replacement. I don’t think this CooSpo model can be used for swimming (not sure) - but I’m not interested in swimming for at least the time being.

@sartoric thanks for the info. Waiting for a fix then