@HoBart we should have a proper Core 2 section in the forum soon.

Judging the long time of receiving updates i dearly hope some proper features or firmware overhaul is being prepared.

@SergioB This to solves my problem, I will try this Suunto Plus App. Thank you so much for your help

@leo250461 I have DND shortcut on long press of one of the buttons on Race 2 for this same reason, works very well.

@johann.fuehrer that’s what I said: Suunto App has to be running that way to be paged by the watch. Same with Garmin Connect BTW…

@André-Faria normally yes for regular runs and training would work but not for the race w crew and whatnot.

@VoiGAS thanks for your reply. I think that this is a bug… I did a dive today , went into deco and the computer states a mandatory stop at 6 m and, at the end of this stop, a safety stop at the same depth. No mention of safety stop at 3 m at any time …

@VoiGAS Only if it has a built in LED flashlight

@davemaps I think the difference can be explained not by the absolute data accuracy but by the data resolution and thresholds used by algorithms. The difference is the most noticeable when I plan a running route on a rolling terrain with a lot of small changes in elevation rather than one large climb and one large descent. I find that the elevation data produced by Suunto App and probably especially the route planner tends to be quite smoothed with a lot of smaller changes in elevation disappearing entirely. In some places I may be going up and down through a substantial dip, but the estimated elevation data would show that as a steady climb. Because of this smoothness, a part of estimated elevation gain is lost with every small climb or descent - the more small climbs and descents there are the more difference in estimated data vs the actual measurements. And not only the total elevation gain and loss numbers that are affected but also climb guidance data for individual climbs - all of them are usually short by anywhere from 10 to 30 feet (3-10 meters).

@isazi Thank you!

@Egika Yes, the indicator is displayed, but only after you switch to the “BARO” page. You obviously don’t stay on that screen 24/7 (if only because button lock and additional views don’t work on that view). On the original first-generation Suunto Core, that indicator in the top-left was visible right on the main locked screen. The huge advantage was that when you were at a camp, for example, a quick glance at the watch told you how the weather was developing without having to switch over to the barometer— but this feature has disappeared. Don’t worry, I’m not jumping to conclusions; I’ve gone through the whole watch and read plenty of reviews, also I’m owner of first generation for years. The feature I’m talking about simply isn’t there. Besides, on the BARO screen itself, that trend indicator is practically useless anyway since you already have a detailed graph right below it.

I had to double check and indeed, leg curls and calf raises are included in the description but are nowhere to be found in selection list. Come on now, please.

@Egika said: I ever wondered why anyone would like to know their step count. It must have been some good marketing from whoever came up with this… I looked into the history of “step count” and asking some people I know who use that metric, and I think a few things came together to make it popular. First was the “10000 steps” idea made by a Japanese marketing firm years ago which I think people liked as being an easy number to remember, and it was promoted as a universal thing (compare with tracking active calories, where people of different weights like need different targets). https://www.nuhs.edu/debunking-the-10000-step-myth-figuring-out-what-actually-matters/ It also resonates with some people as some of their “natural activity counts” towards it, so walking around the house, etc. gets one somewhat toward the goal then they just need to “finish their steps.” I still see it ideally as more of a “training wheels” metric and think at least tracking active calories is better (so other activities like cycling and yoga “count better” despite not having many steps, as opposed to Polar’s system that assigns “step equivalents” to encourage non-walking activity). And Suunto puts steps and calories on the same Daily Health page so I can see someone new to fitness and Suunto thinking “need steps” eventually learning to use calories instead.

@Migsey happened to me 1 or 2 times where the SAC rate is not available in the app, but is available on the dive computer… Old firmware/New firmware dont matter…

@Marco-Gabardi watch face issues are independent from firmware updates. I think it’s not a priority to fix it

@MRHblue doesn’t a new sync restore the deleted dives?

Oui, on est plusieurs à avoir constaté ça. Espérons que Suunto corrige le bogue rapidement.

@Thorlap71 said: @Danny-poleg Before trying to get my watch replaced because of reboots, do you think I should try to revert my watch back to 2.48.16 firmware which is the only previous version available in my “Select OTA pkg”. Is this a reasonable thing to do? Hello. I downgraded and no more reboot. It usually rebooted3-4 times a days, at rest as well as during activity. Regard

@nomison maybe it is a bug or unexpected behavior. No matter what it is I do not expected will be updated. Our Vertical 1 is now out of date with bugs and potential improvements.

@Miquel-Debón Since a few months you can choose what is visible in the lower field on the map. You can choose multiple and toggle between your options. Very useful! I have mainly Heart Rate and Distance to next point on it