@jjorgemoura I have the Garmin HRM Pro+ and it has worked well. They no longer sell it that I am aware of, but I was looking at the HRM 200 as a replacement. The belt on my Pro+ is off and curling. It can be very uncomfortable. I also had issues with a H10. When it worked it was great, but toward the end it had so many drops. I wish Suunto would turn OHR back on when the signal from a strap goes silent, but it does not. I would also look at the Suunto strap, but it only allows one BT connection and no ANT+ so that is a no go for me. I have a Coros band and it is really good. It has given the exact same readings as a functioning H10 or Garmin HRM when tested. Problem is if you want to have Zonesense it does not work.

@Squirrel Thanks a lot for the clarification! That actually makes much more sense now. I’ll record my CTL, ATL, and TSB values for the next 2–3 days and compare them to see if the numbers match yesterday’s CTL − ATL. Thanks again!

@pavel.samokha Hmmm… on iOS i can’t select that. It is not possible to say: strava:yes, Facebook:no, WhatsApp:yes, and so on. That is not supporteted for the Suunto App. (iOS Info in Settings/Messages) Correct me if i am wrong.

@aiv4r Coros has the TIDE watchface. Garmin as well. If you are a multi sport user you need the TIDE info. Suunto included the sport mode “surf”, thank you. But you need to know the tide as well for you surf spot when you are out there in the line up.

The “Resources” indicator is not compatible with the RUN model, instead there is the “Recovery” indicator.

@vinc14 said: have the same problem Thank you, but my question is not about the GPS recording. I accept that… I could change the distance in the Suunto App afterwards and even the pace has been recalculated.

@EzioAuditore and once again it must be remembered that the GPS data collection of the Race 2 is very good, the problem comes later with the software processing of the information to calculate the distance to be displayed.

@Marcelo-Mönch have you given Suunto App the permission to access the geolocation on your mobile?

@Robbin053 The hardware is different so if it wasn’t in the list …

I tested this app quickly on my S9PP amd it works very well! Congrats and thank you for developing this app

No issues with Coospo H808S Chest Strap HR Monitor - great value. Previously used via ANT with Garmin Forerunner (also no issues).

The latest information I found on the Suunto website (Fr) concerns 3.26.20 Staged update starting on June 2nd, 2026 This update brings a new feature and bug fixes New feature: Added training effect to the exercise summary, helping you better understand the impact of your workout Bug fixes: Fixed several issues to improve overall stability No information on the 3.26.22. It would be good if Suunto communicated a little more about the future of the Suunto Run. After monthly updates, it seems that Run is changing to a minimum. I think it’s a shame because users have reported failures or bugs. In addition, there are a lot of possible improvements to be made, especially by opening the platform to third parties. Please Suunto we are waiting for news.

I finally received mine and use them on a run yesterday for the first time. I noticed a bug: at first I could adjust the volume with the touch I had set up (triple tap), but after some time this stopped working; I had media controls on my watch, too, and when I chose the volume option nothing happened.

@Ze-Stuart well it was really not working for me. It was also the xc200, not xc210z

@rémiP Thanks for this - but it seems the problem was somewhere else… “shift” does indeed work - but I now instead use it in an another way/method. It seems I was recreating an array without any need to do so - leading to memory issues. Hopefully now fixed.

@aqua86 it should eventually, but not any time soon. It will take time

The problem is still viral Silence from the support This still fucks me up

Zirkeltraining have no gps recording?

Hi Michele, First of all, thank you very much for publishing your Bosch Smart System project. It has been extremely helpful while researching the Bosch ecosystem. I’m currently analysing Bosch Smart System support in several open-source projects (OpenTracks, Home Assistant, BikeBridge, etc.) to better understand which data is officially available through Bosch’s Live Data Interface (LDI) and which parts still rely on the older proprietary protocol. After studying the available documentation and source code, only a few questions remain that I hope you might be able to answer from your own experience. Official LDI vs. proprietary Bosch protocol Does your current implementation rely exclusively on the official Bosch LDI, or do you still need any data from the older reverse-engineered Bosch BLE protocol? Motor Power and Assist Mode Are these values available through the official LDI, or are they only obtainable through Bosch’s proprietary protocol? Protocol maturity If someone were starting a new open-source project today, would you recommend building directly on the official LDI, or are there still important reasons to support the older Bosch protocol? Firmware compatibility Have you observed any significant differences in LDI behaviour between different Smart System bikes (for example Bosch SX vs. Performance Line CX), or has the protocol been consistent in your experience? Field reliability Are there any officially documented LDI fields that, in practice, are not consistently transmitted by all bikes or firmware versions? I’m trying to distinguish between what is officially supported, what is universally available in practice, and what still depends on reverse engineering. Thank you again for sharing your work and for any insights you can provide.