@Steven-Hambleton oh yes

@Ger43 I have a Race 1 (and Race 2)… the Race 1 has been great, with none of the distance loss / trimming of the Race 2. Lots of comparisons of features online, but from my practical experience, what I’m most concerned about is accurate ascent/descent, and accurate distance. The Race 1 is great in these regards.

Commentary zone has been improved : we now see all text when we want to modify it ; great !

@cheetah694 AI analyse of a fit file (run) especially the record.cvs file from it : The Data Verdict (DFA a1) • Why Garmin is right: Raw data from your record.csv file shows your Aerobic Threshold (VT1) is at 148 bpm, exactly when the heart rate complexity index (DFA a1) hits 0.75. Garmin uses this value to end your Zone 2, matching your real-time physiology.  • Why Suunto is wrong: Suunto sets your threshold at 130 bpm. At this heart rate, your data shows a very high DFA a1 (>0.85), proving your body is still in a state of ease. Following Suunto would unnecessarily restrict your training. • Anaerobic Threshold (VT2): Your data also confirms you enter the critical (anaerobic) zone at 161 bpm (DFA a1 = 0.50), once again validating your Garmin Epix settings.

Like said, it can be done but quality will most likely be bad, meaning you will get either too many or too few turn instructions. The komoot route? No, it’s not bad and quite usable. Have you actually tried it? (There is no room in a gpx file for tbt alerts afaik. All other brands also use fit for this)

@Nikolai-Simonov said in Live location S+ app: @Antoine I had an idea to measure this, but haven’t gotten around to it yet. Honestly, measuring power consumption properly is not as simple as it looks. Battery percentage is a very subjective metric, especially just on-eye observation. To do it right, we would need to use a multimeter and run controlled A/B tests (baseline vs. tracking in background/UI) across different devices multiple times. That’s the only way to get real consumption milliamp numbers instead of just rough estimates. But 3% per hour looks great for continuous live tracking. @nikolai-simonov : thanks for aswer. Of course. It wasn’t a criticism. I just wanted to get a rough idea of the battery drain on the Suunto Vertical. My measurement isn’t super precise, but I’m usually at around 1.6% per hour during an activity (100% ≈ 65h). With the SuuntoPlus Live Tracking app enabled, it’s around 3%, but i just want to confim that (or not). My goal is simply to estimate the overall battery life of my suunto vertical 1 for a long race while using live tracking.

@sky-runner it remembers an old experience with my Spartan Ultra. Searching a lot with the community why it would have strange baro / altitude behaviours, while after repairing it was so perfect. It happens unfortunately that HW is just the cause. (fridge test was the eye opener in my case). It is also why it is important that when issues are raised by some (not you specifically ), Community users should also answer “no issue in the same circumstances”, to orientate the analysis. Good luck with repair / warranty.

@cheetah694 Yep, that sounds like better UX for 90% of the activities. An “End without partner sync” button in the watch that marks the activity to not be automatically synced. A new crop screen in the app. A manual “Sync to partner services” button in these activities. This sounds like the simplest/cleanest solution technically, I’m interested what Suunto devs think. Btw I also saw that Garmin Connect’s mobile trim feature only has a time select which would be more than enough for resolving the issue. [image: 1769003810445-19d2da956cfe66703079c2b9fcbe32aea86843647c74ef5cd41b7ffec1cb610c.png]

@giuliosq Wrist heart rate is highly individual. What works for you does not work for others and vice versa in all conditions. A car is designed to drive around a corner. Yet it does not what it is designed for if you try it on an icy surface.

Under 2.50.26, I notice that my overnight, off-wrist battery consumption approximately doubles (vs 2.46…) My only change for the new FW was to enable North-up mapping. 2.50… did add the wifi weather updates (which do not work for me … could there be repetitive attempts by the watch to connect to wifi and the App that drain power?)

@Brad_Olwin said in Suunto wristband: @Tami999 I managed to snag one of these a few years ago. A friend that works for Suunto gave it to me. Yay, Iam glad my memory is not that bad! Thanks for sharing.

@EzioAuditore said in "Raise to Wake" not working properly during activities: @jjpaz you’re right when toggling it before starting the activity it works as intended. After the activity has been started it doesn’t. Thanks mate. Is this known and reported? I’ve sent ‘Comments’ from Suunto App, but I haven’t received any feedback, so I don’t know if Suunto officialy knows…

@sky-runner I’m sorry, I didn’t mean the graph would look compressed, rather the complete UI would, as it would reduce the whitespace below the headline. If you look at the Android representation, you have a 100 line, but whitespace over the line. TBH I think it looks better with the 120 line and the whitespace. My problem is that the range is shifting around on iOS…

@stbuk Atleast on android you can set time in bed in the phone apps sleep widget. Daily sleep goal->Time in bed

@tom_vertical you are a robot and nobody told you, maybe

@2b2bff Promise you, no. Tracking naps is one of some things I don’t need.

@el.Fakir Gôôd luck.