Okay, it was in the morning. Now I connected the Vertical to use it for cycling. Suunto app decided to show the standard watch face during the first sync. Suunto, I accept the challenge!

@PetrMisek But if you look, the graph perfectly shows the problem. One could think, not knowing, that you slept from midnight until 5 PM the next day. It is not helpful at all. Also, why does the axis show 120 percent? Is this another bug by Suunto? And then again, right after the activity, there is a rapid rise in the resources.

After the replacement of my V2 by support, I finally have a true flagship that has nothing to envy to more prestigious models and brands that, in the same segment, cost twice as much. The Suunto Vertical 2 with AMOLED display has significantly better battery life than the Fenix 51mm, with sport and health metrics that are fully comparable. For the past month I have been wearing the Fenix 51mm AMOLED, Suunto Vertical 2, and Whoop 5 at the same time, and sleep data from Suunto and Garmin are often overlapping. When Garmin’s sleep data are completely different from Whoop’s, Whoop matches the Vertical’s data. Maps deserve a special mention. On the Suunto V2 they are fast, smooth, lag-free, and very easy to read. It is truly a very solid and reliable tool. If your sensors are not working or the watch freezes, send it to support and get it replaced. You were probably just unlucky. Now I’m just waiting for Suunto developers to export health data to TrainingPeaks, and I’ll leave Garmin for good!

@Neil-McElroy My range is given as 72-85ms. I guess on average I get a 80,81 but obviously with some variation. Recently, after having couple of drinks, I got a 53ms in that night. Couple of days before, I was feeling like I was about to get sick. When I checked HRV for the night before, I had 71ms. Arguably, it’s not that much below the minimum of the range but as I scored usually 80s I thought it matches the bad feeling I had on that day (might be confirmation bias).

I love my Suunto watch thanks! As always, people will want things that aren’t available and for me that’s two things - Watch faces with larger, more readable complications. It’s not hard to do, just increase the size, test it on people like me, then add it to the list. Building a cloud architecture to store watch settings in a granular fashion so for example I could do a clean install but only restore routes and custom sports - which is a much more complex undertaking! My only other criticism is that I don’t have enough money to buy a Vertical 2

@Tieutieu but the problems were not solved

@Ecki-D. Lately, it has worked well for me. It happened twice in about a month. I always had the SpO2 enabled.

correct. We had a similar issue with downhill MTB. I am not sure if it is the same underlying issue. There will be a Q4 FW release - just not sure if it arrives in December or early January because of the holidays.

@2b2bff Thank you

For the record, I think the Race 2 and Vertical 2 faces are very good, I’d like to see more development in terms of options for those two. For example being able to configure the Race 2 graph to show us sleep over time, or HRV, or CTL, or cycle through all three if you tap on it. The same with the Vertical 2, make the bottom complication configurable too! Oh and larger complication fonts

Hi, I’m having issues again with HR data not being recorded in the last part of the activity. There have now been consecutive updates all at the same time, so it is difficult to understand why the problem has occurred again. I’ve updated the Polar H10 to latest fw, 4.1.10 I’ve updated SA to 6.5.7 (Android) I’ve updated the Run to 3.22.24 [image: 1765211731887-run.png]

@Armin-M it’s funny because it is just the way from the watch to the Phone not working. Information from the Phone to the watch worked well.

@sky-runner Totally agree. I like Coros, but it has been even more obvious with some of the folks they pay to review their watches.

this thread is about HR belts smelling funny, not about issues with the data. Please stay In Topic

@Heidi thank you! Meanwhile I got an update to 6.5.9 last night and it looks like it solved the problem.

@Stavrogin Re “Not sure what I am saying yes to”. You weren’t saying “Yes” there in my reply. I was, in acknowledgment that you were showing the app I had suggested initially but not understanding (“?”) why you were directing the post at me. I didn’t suggest the sport profile. Perhaps @leehikes was your intended recipient?

@TED77 luckily I have both Suunto and Polar belts, so I just switched to Suunto and gave Polar to my wife, since she’s an Apple girl and has no problems with H10 that is my solution

@zagazoo Yep [image: 1764871308412-img_3154.jpeg]

@sneike said in Suunto Vertical battery modes: @Brad_Olwin said in Suunto Vertical battery modes: @sneike said in Suunto Vertical battery modes: @Brad_Olwin said in Suunto Vertical battery modes: @sneike The only watch that lets you use maps in Custom mode is the Vertical. There are contradictory information online, are we 100% sure of this? The only one I can enable maps in a custom battery mode is the vertical. Thank you for clarifying that. Do you also confirm that if we start an activity with a custom battery mode and set the GPS accuracy to OK, we can expect the battery life of the Ultra mode as long we don’t keep the map (or the ETA data fields) on the screen all the time? I think if you run maps at all it will impact battery life in Ultra mode. If you save the mode for a specific custom sport profile the battery estimate shown on the watch should be reasonable. I assume you need battery to last 280h?? I used my V1Solar for a fast pack trip in August that was 4d with sleep tracking, OHR, etc enabled and about 12h of GPS per day. My battery estimates in Performance mode ranged from 62h to 90h. I did not charge the watch and had 38% left by the end of the trip. I use Performance unless I need the extra battery and then would use Endurance. Unlikely for me I would need 280h of continuous tracking.