And their last answer: Thanks for getting back to me. These data fields are expected to be available on the Karoo in an upcoming update once testing is completed. For that reason, I’m not able to confirm a specific timeframe just yet. Thank you for your input and for your understanding. Take care, and happy riding. Best regards, @dimitrios-kanellopoulos I think we just have to wait further until they have finished their part

@sky-runner said in Unboxing 90th Anniversary Edition: @Freezer When the 90th anniversary edition is supposed to ship? Some people seem to already have it. Like 2 weeks ago i was able to add Vertical 2 Limited 90th anniversary to basket and pay for it in Poland smartwatch shop. I havent seen any info its gonna be send after 10th march. Not sure if I would buy it I wouldnt already got it on my hand :D. It looks cool but as Race 2 owner I dont need it. Its cool for collectors. I’ll sell my watch when Race 3 will be released and if cool enough for switch.

@2b2bff Well it’s exactly the topic I was talking about to start with.

@zhangschmidt said in My Vertical 2 Wishlist for Next Update in 2026: Any change of watch means that an HRV baseline has to be established anew That is even the case with Garmin. I guess the hardware variations are big enough that it is not meaninful to apply the baseline of an older watch to a newer one…

@raven said in Wahoo Kickr Core 2 speed and distance: @Dwartus said in Wahoo Kickr Core 2 speed and distance: Thank you for your proposal, for that topic when I run outside with my bike, I add a Suunto “Bike POD” which provide to the watch cadence ans speed. Also, I remember that during the run the average speed and speed is given by the “Bike POD”, but at the end of the actvity, GPS data are used to give average speed and distance. Nevertheless, you understood that I didn’t connect/used this Suunto “Bike POD” for Home Trainer activity (also save “Bike POD” battery because unmount). Thanks Oops, I missed this in my last reply. If you already have a speed/cadence sensor you use outdoors, then yes try that as an additional sensor for your indoor rides and it should work. Yes ! Thanks for the hint, I didn’t think about that because actually not installed because Home Trainer period As a conclusion, the Suunto watch Race/Race S (perhaps other models) are not able to catch all the data broadcasted by Wahoo trainer, only power meter can be read (but not as a Suunto “Power POD” because not possible to calibrate it), it’s too bad Thank you

@Ecki-D. But to me, this is definitely a used battery issue, as if i switch on the watch for running, it will turn off instant.

@cosme.costa Having Suunto OHR armband would be cool. Sorry being offtopic

@Nandodiver i’m a 3-star CMAS diver. for training purposes, we dive to a maximum depth of 42 meters. they said that due to Suunto issues, their sensors were unreliable, but I really liked the Nautic S, especially its visible screen and design. thank you very much.

@cosme.costa That’s obvious. Sooner or later, it has to happen. Considering the age of HW V1, support is still long-lasting, and Suunto gets a thumbs up for that.

@shamilt1 Suunto uses something called FusedSpeed. It uses GPS and your steps to calculate your distance. So it is possible the calculation differs, especially as GPS coverage gets bad…

My run today was spot on. Used the Run with the Coros HRM and it was exactly the same as the Polar chest strap. Before I had followed the suggestions and uninstalled and reinstalled the app. So it does seem that at least for this run it has eliminated the spiking. However it has been mentioned in previous posts that uninstalling and reinstalling the app solved the problem each time in occured suggesting it is a temporary fix and not a permanent solution. It also doesn’t alter the data that is already present and incorrect from previous runs so I do believe it’s an issue Suunto need to look into.

@gipfelkind I found the cause: the Morning Report is triggered by arm movement while I’m still in bed. If I don’t see it and leave it undismissed for an hour, it vanishes and cannot be accessed again that day.

@Nikolai-Simonov If this feature can also help reduce the phone’s battery consumption, that would be amazing. Sometimes when we go deep into the forest, the phone keeps trying to search for a signal, which can drain the battery faster. I really like this feature and I hope it continues to improve. Keep up the great work with the development!

I just gave up with all the sleep and recovery tracking and use it as a normal watch. More batterylife and no stress with useless functions that work when ever they feel like

@Elipsus said in 9PP Appreciation in 2026 / Things to fix before it's orphaned: it’s a really nice minimalist design and great functionality combo (that unfortunately doesn’t seem to exist “anywhere else” including in other brands) Yes, this has me worried enough to consider purchasing a second 9PP as a backup. I agree with you that the design and functionality are just about perfect. I doubt we’ll ever see another fully-featured, minimal, MIP-based watch like it again, from Suunto or any other brand. The Coros Apex 4 was a nice MIP surprise, but I can’t get on with their design language. and the battery life is definitely not 20 days anymore Yeah, that ship sailed when the software moved to 24/7 HR recording. When the 9PP was first released, it recorded at 10 minute intervals, which saved a ton of battery. Personally, I find the daily HR readings meaningless, so I switch it off during the day. I turn it back on at night if I want to record sleep. Seems to add a few days to the battery life.

Great news! It would be fantastic if these apps could also be launched directly in the future (not just during training). That would open up even more possibilities. But it’s a very good start

@maszop said in New SMART barometric algorithm: @wakarimasen This has nothing to do with measuring altitude itself — that’s never been a problem with Suunto. Look at the top part of the altitude graph, and you’ll see a jagged line with multiple little, sharp peaks (caused by strong wind) that add up, giving absurd ascent and descent totals. It’s a bit better since the last update, but the results are still absurd and essentially useless for any analysis. Understood. Ascent/ descent isn’t so important for me, I guess. I’m just pleased to get to the top, and know how far there is to go on the way there. My Polar watch ‘over-read’ by 10m at the summit, for comparison.