@Sascha-Domres i think you might have misunderstood my comments point, but anyway. It is fine to be dissapointed, it is not fine to create posts like that, it comes out as abit aggresive and rude. “Resume later” is in no way an essential feature for any watch in the world would it be 100eur or 1000eur watch. I would understand if we would be talking about sportswatch that does not track GPS or smth, in that case I would agree that critisism is well placed. My point was that I think 600eur is a lot of money and I would be very careful where I put that and if “Resume later” is such an important function, please check before buying (forum exists, reddit exits, ask chatGPT eventualy, sometimes it is correct). We can discuss forever if it is useful feature or not, but that is another discussion and it was suggested like a million times, just search this forum.

@SamppaP yes I reported this, it seems unrelated to the watch but something that is happening with the app

@tm3610 said: Any idea if there are rumors of a new Run or smaller, budget variant? IMHO a Run 2 and a Race S successor is to come in the next months. The real question is when…

@SergioB Thanks! Just tried it on a test walk and it works perfectly. I didn’t realise you could change navigation while in an activity. It worked fine changing navigation from a route to the newly created POI. Thanks, Richard

If anyone sent logs after the activity, send me a DM with the email associated with your account.

If (and so far that is a big IF) a new firmware release will be available for my race is I will be very hesitant to install it, reading all those crash reports after the new race 2/vertical 2 firmware. The bluetooth connection lost to heart rate sensors isn’t fixed anyway, so I might as well stay on the current firmware.

@FLCH2 Hey, This is an English speaking forum, please use english to make it easier for everyone to understand (and answer you), don’t hesitate to use a translator if you don’t think you can do it, but don’t put the burden on the whole forum to translate your post. Your battery may be miscalibrated, you should let it run completely empty, put it on the charger, wait until it reaches 100%, and wait 2 hours more to be sure its really completely charged, then you use it again down to 0% and you should be good to go…probably ? 2-3 days is really really low, so you may have a bigger underlying issue, if that didn’t work, your best bet may be to send it back for service.

@Zesty said: @elbee both watches are set to On. I would think the display is the largest consumer of battery. Hers dies within 4 days max despite having the display off. I don’t know which is the largest. I do know bloodoxygen is the largest useless consumer.

@2b2bff said: Sadly, those do not only fix bugs but introduce new ones. And the last one has been 4 months ago with no new beta in sight, yet… https://forums.garmin.com/beta-program/fenix-7-series/f/announcements/441652/beta-version-27-15--check-for-updates-only Btw, It seems I can count 3 mayor betas in 2026 (splitted in 15 minor announced versions only this year). It is not the same release calendar/features as for the supported watches, but the bug fixes are there (even for Garmin). It is also more than nothing. I understand Suunto is focused in the new watches but it’s also a lot of time a watch like the Vertical is forgotten with the remaining bugs. And, when bugs, this can be a very bad image of the brand for the users that have the watch.

Hi @egika Do you know when this drill feature will be on the Ocean? All other models seem to have gotten this, and I just feel like the Ocean is being neglected. Last year I ran into multiple issues with the Race S and Suunto said for my swimming use case the Ocean is the best they have, but now it seems that the Ocean does not get the new features in time. Maybe @dimitrios-kanellopoulos have some insights into this as well? Kind Regards Reino

@BokiRun In terms of heart rate, I have no complaints about the RUN. I compared it with a Polar H9 during a vigorous workout, and it was flawless.

@VoiGAS thanks!! I’ll look into it. My hope is to get him thinking about training sessions using RPE first, and HR as secondary feedback. So this might be the way I go.