@VoiGAS No differences that I have noticed.

@Efejota I am in my mid 50s. In my experience readability of a watch screen depends not only on size of details but more importantly on the contrast. With age eyes become much less sensitive to low contrast details. Unless there is a bright sun, MIP tends to have a much lower contrast than AMOLED, especially when combined with sapphire crystal which adds a lot of reflections. That’s because MIP works primarily with reflected light. That is the reason I can’t use a MIP watch anymore. I tend to run in a forest a lot, and on an overcast day a screen of an MIP watch with sapphire crystal looks blurry to me while AMOLED looks much more crisp even with smaller details. But I should add that I still have difficulties with AMOLED even on a large 1.5" Vertical 2 screen when low contrast color combinations are used, for example when dark green trails are rendered on light green background. I should add that I’ve just learned that older people especially have difficulties distinguishing shades of green and blue because of yellowing of natural lenses in the eyes. Perhaps that explains of why I have so much difficulty with seeing trails on all Suunto map themes except the high contrast one. To better accommodate older users Suunto should change color of trails from green to black or perhaps some other higher contrast color such as dark red or dark brown.

@Pyranya said: @Brad_Olwin So the sensor may be fine? greez Yes, my sensors last forever, still using one from Ambit 3 Peak

A huge thank you to the team for the quick turnaround and to everyone for the testing, I’ll be proceeding with the update on the Traverse later this evening!

@Milan-Novák said: @isazi ok I will send logs, that should be done through About app -> Send logs to Suunto in android app? Yes, this one. Then send me a message.

Deleted duplicate

@jmlee said: @snow Thanks for the tip. I tried it, but still see no improvement. I downloaded the Polar Beat App to my phone, and it connected with the VS-Armband without any problems. I assume that Polar is going to say it’s a Suunto issue, and that Suunto will say the opposite. The chronology of my problems points to Polar, as the Suunto P9P was updated in November and again in January. But, I was able to use the VS-Armband fine from receiving it in early December until the 3.0.15 firmware upgrade. Alas…. Maybe if you contact Polar with those insights they can track what changed on the firmware. Contact here I ordered a Verity Sense to use with my Ambit 3 because my coospo hw9 did exactly the same as you explain with the ambit 3 peak (worked ok with garmin 1040, hammerhead etc), hope I can use it. Edit: just sent an email to polar france poiting to this thread, maybe useful if those who already have the issues can contact polar and them doing something. Edit2: if someone still has 2.2.6 or older maybe can back it up connecting to a pc and using claude code or other way DOes anyone can confirm me if it works or not with Ambit 3? Some old threads said yes and hence why I bought it, would annoy me that it would do the same thing as the Coospo HW9 I had.

@jinkelasaodang the default watch face: yes. Which others are there?

@isazi a pretty fresh one maybe

@usainzg in my case it was a bit different. There was a clear lag when panning around the map. I had a video, but unfortunately deleted it as it improved and seems to be ok now.

@JochenParat said: images of the Banner and the Watch Preview This might be the cache as it used to be this way. Although implementing some nice cache buster would be nice.

@Apor-Szabó Exactly the same problem, they change it for new one and i’ve got same problem with new. Now i don’t know what to do, because two belts, even new one has the same problem. My watch is Suunto Ocean. Did you find any solutions?

@Speed-Man same happen to me.

Nice but need to add MORE exercises including single leg exercies.

@Panagiotis-Kritikakos gauges are tricky, especially if you want to go with canvas. It’s resource intense.