@cosme.costa said in Strap/Band color suggestion for 90th Anniversary Edition: I do not agree that Suunto’s textile strap is low quality. There are two reasons why I wrote that: The metal clasp at the end of the strap fell off within a few weeks. I was able to fix it back with pliers, but that felt cheap! it came with 2 straps included - a short one and a long one. Well, the short one was too short and the long one was borderline too long. After a couple of months of wearing it, the strap lose a little bit of elasticity that it had and stretched out, so now it was way too long for my wrist. Also, because there no longer was any elastisticity, sometimes it felt uncomfortable on multi-hour trail runs. My wrists aren’t meaty. In comparison, the 90th anniversary strap feels so much more comfortable. It is very similar to Garmin Ultrafit strap too that I used for several years in the past.

@dreamer_ Another version of Pace 4 as you wrote or perhaps another version of Apex 4. The post says: “Retaining top-level performance as is, to a new look and feel.” I hope they put a sapphire crystal on R2S.

No day without another new vibecoded service. This one is at least more-Suunto specific, not yet another “I made MCP server so you can connect Claude to your Suunto data” (then repeat spam post for Garmin/Coros/etc.) It’s great that people are doing various services, but seems like LLM made this so easy that people not thinking enough about the implications. Vibecode first, market second, reasoning later if ever. But yeah, already think on making paid options What’s the point of the service? What it adds in comparison with Suunto App? Majority of the users sync their Suunto Watch with Suunto App, so even if some third-party service can extract and upload watchfaces, they will likely by overwritten when user sync his watch to SA. Or if they care to change IDs then you can end up with duplicates. And I can continue with other questions, like what happens if Suunto do changes to WF API/format. Then you can break something in the watch using third-party service like this. Find out how to make custom WF? OK, same as above, the fact that you can find out, doesn’t mean it’s good - maybe Suunto is not releasing it because it’s not yet ready for general audience and risky to break the watch. All in all, for the author: good catch to reverse engineer the protocol, for ordinary users: beware.

Never had a problem to read any MIP, but could not stand the distraction and „noise“ of the Amoled Display. I prefer a not phony watch outdoor much more and also in the office…

As it might help someone else that stumbles on the same problem… At least for me it was this Win11 setting that changed things for the better: [image: 1779361611853-34c5e7c4-b6da-4083-9a1f-d14850795012-image.png] Seems stupid in hindsight, but I was not aware that Default only identifies low-power connectivity Bluetooth devices. Happy days! no I will be able to test my apps!

@peegee If you loaded a route, the % displayed on guidance screen is the average slope on remaining distance of the climb. If you are using climb app, the % is the “current” slope (based on last seconds or X meters - don’t the calulation method used - maybe already mentionned on the forum).

not a priority, but it would be nice

@Sergei-Ladeishchikov Thank you for your confirmation! I’m glad it’s not just me screwing things up

I have the same issue. I sent watch data to Suntoo. I want to ask, does factory reset remove my own intervals?

@Elad-Solomon Just check to have set your HR zones and pace zone correctly, and then wait 42 days (6 weeks). That is the time needed to have all stats working properly

I’ve also added a new branch in the ESP32 repo: https://github.com/SellA/BoschEBikeESP32/tree/feature/multi-mode Besides the standard bridge mode, it now supports exposing standard BLE sensor profiles as well: Power + Cadence Speed + Cadence Power only These modes don’t provide the full Bosch telemetry, but they work without the companion SuuntoPlus app and integrate natively with Suunto’s internal metrics and training features. For example, power data is correctly used for Suunto power zones, training load calculations, and related analytics. I also updated the integrated WiFi access point UI, where all bridge settings can now be configured directly from the browser: [image: 1779313377850-241b5f60-a758-476f-9131-c1158af2009e-image.png] There is now also a simulation mode that allows testing the connection with Suunto watches and bike computers without needing to connect to the actual eBike. Useful for validating the setup or experimenting with different configurations without having the bike nearby.

No news of a small update?

@JSampson I have a found a Workaround for me: i am Using „Health Sync“ to Sync Sleep and HRV to Apple Health. From Apple Health i am using HealthFit to Sync this HRV and Sleep to TrainingPeaks. That works but is still a workaround. This Sync have to be a nobrainer and native integrated into the Suunto App. TrainingPeaks Integration in Suunto is still not good. (No Intervall Counter visible, Health Data Sync, Workout Preview on Watch, etc)