@jjorgemoura try to disable ZoneSense from your S+ apps. It seems it helps me with my Race S.

In addition, it would be cool if I could add friends I follow as dive partners and they would also be found automatically with the name

@Francesco-Pagano this one is from last autumn. I was quite surprised cause earlier swims didn’t work that well from gps. I just carried the watch on my wrist. [image: 1783205866692-img_8192.jpeg]

@Brainicus said: I know this question has been asked several times before, but seeing a delay with releasing a strikingly similar Nautic S and the fact GF99/SurfGF are supported on a larger Nautic cousin, the question bears repeating… Is there a chance we will see these two features on Ocean? Perhaps, as a part of the upcoming firmware upgrade as I’d expect Ocean and Nautic S share a lot of under the surface bits? (And yes, I’m aware the published Nautic S manual doesn’t include these features, but I’m still hoping for an omission in the manual rather than the removed functionality v Nautic) Up this subject! GF99 and SurfGF

@freeheeler said: @Jose-Luis-Merino-Parra it is under improvement and further development. I am giving frequent feedback and also wish we can soon benefit from it Where do you send feedback please, is there a specific thread or something in the app? Im currently trying a 10 week trail plan but the sessions don’t seem to correlate to my age and performance, which I thought the AI would take in to account setting it up based on previous training. For example my Z2 pace is about 8m/km (OK I’m old and slow but Suunto knows this) but just as an example one session this week was an easy Z2 run of 10k in 1 hour - for me that’s definitely not Z2! I realise it’s still under development but I’d like to feed that back to the right place. Also does anyone know if the plan adapts or updates itself based on performance during the sessions?

Ok, I see… Thanks for the explanation.

Hi, yes it is very accurate, the problem I’m having is that I do swim in a 20mts pool and I want to be notify before or about to complete every 100 mts. lap, the watch keeps beeping or notifying after I complete the 100 mts. so regularly I end swimming other 10-20 mts. more. Do you know how can I fix this or if there is a problem with my race 2?

I am happy with my 9pp. However: I turned off automatic updates since 2.37.48 I did a rollback because heart rate issues. Question. How much do I miss with not having latest update? If I install latest update, am I able to roll back to 2.37.48 if I don’t like it?? Thanks for your help.

Another review. This one from Scubaverse collab Scubaverse Suunto Nautic

@Pierre-Matelski Même chose pour moi. Il y a 6 mois, ma batterie tenait plus de 2 semaines avec environ 5-6h d’activité gps. J’avais déjà optimisé pas mal de truc pour qu’elle tienne le plus possible (pas de FC H24, pas de raise to wake, pas de suivi de sommeil). Désormais je suis à moins de 2 semaines et je passe de 30 à 10% en 2 jours. Ça reste convenable car j’ai tout optimisé, mais si j’utilisais toutes les fonctionnalités, je serais à moins d’une semaine. Je me demande aussi si ça ne vient pas de la grosse MAJ qu’il y a eu après la sortie de la Race 2.

I have been testing with 3 different LED flashlight on / near / close / up and down to the POD and the Nautic and the computer held its connection state as expected. So I do not expect that the RFI is causing the signal to become in-stable. Maybe a combination with POD pressure buildup in combination with RFI? I hope the Suunto dev teams can find the issue reading my POD and Nautic logs.

@stereodreieck86 Hi there! I try to answer you by points: 1- My implementation use only official LDI. Proprietary control need an android or IOS phone paired to the ebike to read the data. There is a security going on on the first pairing that need to be done and there is no reverse engineering available on that. Other uses data from the can bus but it need physical access to the bus. 2- No for both at the current state 3- LDI is the easiest one to go with. Older protocol is all reverse engineered but has additional data and hardware requirements 4- I have only one gen4 and one gen5 personally tested and they work nicely 5- I can’t test but probably the only field not available is the light sensor (working on my Kiox400C). Probably not available if there isn’t a display (i suppose, not confirmed). As a bonus i can say that i’ve tested all the non documented data field on the LDI protocol and no data is transmitted. All that is documented is all that we have.