@Mads-Hintz-Madsen yes that’s what I did. thanks

@Brad_Olwin Thanks, it’s helpful to know that it’s been noted by the testers, and that it hasn’t just fallen through the cracks. I realize that every new bit of development is prioritized according to various parameters, but fingers crossed this is such a small fix that it can actually get done.

@Dušan-Ković There is another thread where it is reported that when the pool length is changed, the pace is not updated. See https://forum.suunto.com/topic/9853/are-good-developers-so-hard-to-find-editing-distance-in-suunto-app-fails-to-update-related-data-like-pace Somehow I don’t believe this is easy to fix.

@Michał-Kasprzyk absolutely agree - 30s may not seem a long time but at 2 in the morning it’s an age!

@tiago ok so you are saying pace zones are indeed used to classify the workout. That would indeed be the only way for this to have happened, as I have had runs with higher AVG and max HR that were still classified as Aerobic

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos I did that,I went to walk with my dog for about 15 minutes with gps on. It’s much better than previous tracks, just don’t know if it was for the long gps fix or for the software update. Tomorrow I will update you about that for now only positive things about the update

@Egika in Suunto race shows active calories and total calories like Garmin. I tested Fênix 7 solar in my right wrist and Suunto Race on left and I can say steps from the day and calories are almost the same number, normally ,last 7 days average 3176 calories day on Suunto and 3180 on Garmin,21052 steps average on Suunto 20938 average on Garmin,so I think their algorithm is similar now. Ps. I don’t care about steps and calories,was just to say they count both,active calories and calories burned out of exercise

@tiago if I’m right about my airport thing. It’s potentially increasingly untrue the further you get from the airports.

@Mff73 I have 16Gb in the watch only and plenty in the phone. So, this can save me in an unexpected place

@Egika I wonder if the problems encountered after the SV fw was released have also been solved for the S9PP. I really hope this is the case, otherwise I would really prefer it to be held back further.

When going deeper into the topic I actually started to wonder how my titanium grade 5 Coros looked so good.

@far-blue I have used Coros pro two years, did not flip the screen. I liked to use my left thumb. Now one week I used it in flipped mode, nah, do not like it

I’m not sure why this couldn’t be implemented though. Surely if Suunto can derive a VO2 Max from running then cycling can’t be too far out of the box

@Christian-Abrahamsson Won’t start as in, black screen? Or do you get an error code?

@colinmacdon This has happened to me a few times as well. I was going to send it back but then decided to wait for the update. When that didn’t arrive when the Vertical’s did, that was a bit frustrating, but hopefully it will come soon and fix this issue along with the other small bugs. I have to admit that it’s kind of frustrating that Suunto doesn’t release smaller bug fixes more frequently—there clearly are a lot of bugs with this new software, and fixing a few at a time seems like a better approach to me than waiting months, especially for their new flagship watches.