@Yak-Ima said in Another review, this is from Correr una maraton:
Why do you guys think there is such difference in how ohr is working for different reviewers? This one it seems to be spot on, and the previous one I read (DCR and The5k) were much worse.
The only thing @the5krunner had about OHR was initial notes on accuracy, and it was rather neutral to positive if you ask me. The DCR was just a hit job, clear and simple.
As stated, to come to the market without route navigation is something that I can’t understand at all, it blows my mind…
Honestly, I don’t quite get that fixation with route guidance. For one, the watch is clearly targeting laymen fitness crowd jogging in a park, not an Ironman athletes on some technical trails. Kind of hard to get lost in the park! Second, it’s a smartwatch and you do have an app for that! Multiple actually… Third, the watch does come with maps and breadcrumb path, so should you get lost in a said park, you can still navigate back to your nice little Tesla Model 3 and drive to a nearest Starbucks for an energizing grande soy latte or whatever… Last but not least… Polar Vantage upon release didn’t have navigation for months, if not a year, and it was buggy as hell immediately afterwards (crashing the said watch). Now, Vantage is a dedicated pro watch per marketing. Not a smartwatch by any stretch of imagination.
Also, I started to use the always on display (I never used it as I though it was going to burn the battery down) and it’s true, I don’t see much of a difference in battery life.
Yeah, bless the ambient display on Android!
Somehow our well informed DCR totally missed the fact that the big feature of Apple Watch 5 had been available on Android watches for a while now. Both for watch face, and the apps. Makes you wonder what else the guy is missing…