@wotus logs help Suunto developers to dig into data trying to find the root cause and eliminate potential bugs… it doesn’t help you directly. soon after sending logs you need to let Suunto close people know the time when you’ve sent the logs and from what mail address (connected account). I’ve also had very strange things happening with my watch. Fortunately not repeatedly. let’s hope your observation was a one time issue

@mikekoski490 heavily discussed on this forum, make a search and you will find all detailled explanation

@uranfl I think I found the cause of the problem. While the activity is paused, the watch still measures burned calories, but does not add them to the total. As the activity continues, the algorithm adds up the calories burned while pausing the activity shortly after pressing the resume button. This rapid jump in calories burned then confuses the Burner algorithm, which then malfunctions for a while.

In this case , which mode is best to select when gotta a hiit mode?

@vietpq Others can comment on this as something may have changed but, my understanding was trail run calculates 3D and running does not. I think hiking was not calculating 3D but believe that has been changed as well. No matter, as I stated before I have 4 months of running mountains with Garmin Epix2 on one arm and a Suunto 9Peak on the other. You cannot tell the difference between them easily nor is there any statistical difference in the distance or elevation data.

@dimitrios-kanellopoulos thanks!

@egika maybe this is the case… but i am not using snap to route when GPS is that accurate …

@seanvk this comment and thread could be of interest for you… it seems to be a known topic https://forum.suunto.com/topic/6655/body-resources-general-whackiness/25

I had a really bad gps experience today also . I did Snap to route to align it during the expertise but it was also terrible and the distance and the metrics are all over the place . Actually a 5km shows (snapped to route ) as 3,8km . During the run the device the auto pause was enabled even though I had a 5:30/km pace . The average he pace shows 6.05m/km and the NGP as 7:23…

@alexeg said in Problems with Resources and other: @mountainchris the Body Battery function primarily helps to understand when it is possible to increase the load after an illness. It’s always works. It happens that a week after the illness you feel good, you do a light jog and the watch shows stress at times stronger after it. Then it is clear that you need to rest for another day or two, and then run again easily and compare the result with the previous one. Here’s an example of what the stress charts looked like during my last illness in October 2021 (it was covid-19): [image: 1655531046310-img_8628.jpg] October 13: woke up and felt fine. A simple hike of 17 km was planned for this day, but there was rain and a fairly strong wind. After looking at the readings of the Body Battery, I decided that I would not go on a hike (the experience of using the watch said that they should be trusted). By lunchtime, the temperature rose and the state of health worsened. [image: 1655531171500-img_8629.jpg] The next day was even more difficult. The graph shows that even at night the stress goes through the roof and the body does not recover. But on the night following it, recovery periods are already appearing (blue color on the chart) [image: 1655531478218-img_8634.jpg] And this is what the data looks like already for October 30, after which I returned to training. Garmin perfectly understands the state of the body and helps to plan the load. And you can only underestimate this function if you haven’t used it before. And Suunto deceives its users when they claim that their watches can do the same. They claim a different thing btw. But the metrics are in most watches other than Apple Watch and FitBit on this front are still questionable and almost useless (the tell you what you already know …) In any case , I really feel that the watch should not be replacing us

@simon I have the same experience with S9b. A3P performed better in this regard.

@brad_olwin Thank you! I don’t really have good pictures, but I will try to add some. I just have the impression that the readings in 24/7 are always higher than what they are in reality. I’ll also try wearing the watch even higher up. Keep you posted!

@isazi agree, I did that and I don’t notice a higher battery consumption. 24/7 HR and frequent activity have a much higher impact than backlight IMHO

Hi Same as you guys, I’ve discovered Gravel mode today in the App. I’m using a SSU and I modified the basic Road Cycling sport mode for my Gravel moves. With this new mode, do you feel such Gravel mode will be directly added to my SSU or because it’s an “obsolete” model I will have to change the sport mode myself in the App Thanks

@simon I voted for this, if the watch has a route displayed this would replace that route. Hopefully not resulting in the watch crashing while recording. It may be an issue for the resources but I do not see why as one can enable a route while exercising.

Reported, I will share updates if/when possible.

@wotus I believe steps are counted as part of overall basal metabolism. This aids in determining the total number of calories you expend, which includes exercise and whether you are sedentary or moving.