@Sebastian-Wagner-0 said in Is run classification (e.g. VO2max vs Aerobic vs Anaerobic) based on flat pace rather than NGP?: The classification(Auto Tags) is based on Pace, HR and Power Zones But that’s exactly the point I am trying to make. Yes, I was in pace zone 5 for 20 minutes, but only because I was running downhill running downhill, dropping 1100 ft in those 20 minutes. But that wasn’t a true zone 5 effort. Why isn’t NGP (grade adjusted pace) used for the classification? Similarly, for the uphill it shows me in pace zone 1, but that wasn’t an aerobic zone 1 effort either. The whole thing wasn’t designed for running on hilly terrain.

@sartoric said in URL in workoht description ist removed by "Moderator": afair it was done to avoid spam on comments by hacked users that can follow you or by hacked users you follow Makes sense.

Are there any news on the “interval/guide laps not beeing exported to third parties (and .fit file) correctly if lap button is presed”? See the iOS-sister issue Interval laps are not exported to third parties (and .fit file) correctly… Are there release notes of some kind?

@Worrachat-C. Try to close the App completely, then re open your App. Now the correct values should shown now. Its here the same since last app update

@ChicChoc yeah I guess the best way to steer this right now, is setting pace zones and the lowest option of training time available for the plan, so that it cant schedule runs that are too long. And maybe choose a plan like “get fast for 5km/10km” which will have naturally shorter runs. After setting pace zones btw you’ll have to sync first and create a new plan.

At least the iOS App does show values below if you have any… [image: 1764947563502-06db19f5-7d5b-43df-8bcd-45038e31ad72-image.png]

And naturally i’ve lost my complications by this operation returning into vertical v1

In Pool swimming there is a strange swim style “Apnoe” but “Freestyle” is missing. Why is Apnoe the new Freestyle? [image: 1764105164139-20251125_220553.png]

@Claude06440 il y a parfois des écarts de D+ théoriques entre applications mais rarement autant. A confirmer peut-être en comparaison avec d’autres sorties prévues ? Quoi qu’il en soit tracer avec l’appli c’est rapide, donc seule option à te proposer si tu n’as pas/plus confiance : tu prépares si komoot mais tu ré-trace ensuite dans l’appli Suunto. Au pire tu auras juste des écarts sur le D+ restant dans l’écran de guidage sur le profil. Mais globalement jamais eu du simple au double. Quel était le D+ final mesuré ?

I’ve the same issue with my Suunto 9 peak pro: After the latest updated the summary of an intervall training is vanished! I would love to have this again

@ant1d I have a work profile too but do not get any work notification (ever). Actually I think there is some permission which prevents work notification to be visible to the Suunto App. For instance I do not see Slack in the apps within SA. I’m on Pixel 8, Android 16 (not 100% sure, but I do not remember this problem on 15)

@mando Would be great of Suunto would tweak this. If I need to stop to pee and I forget to pause, the pace graph is basically destroyed.

@Luka_Kemp incredible 🫣🫣🫣🫣

Does anybody knows what powerzones are used, when you set the tss to power instead of hr or what calculation is done in the background?

To make the discrepency between the lap table in the app and the data recorded in the fit file even more obvious, I have highlighted the intervals in intervals.icu and linked them to the lap table. As shown in the previous post, there is up to 9 seconds of difference between the data in the fit file and the lap table over an interval of ~1m40s. That’s huge, it would be good to have an explanation. See the picture below: on the left, the intervals highlighted on intervals.icu, on the right the lap table from the suunto app. [image: 1762199835265-capture-d-%C3%A9cran-2025-11-03-205403.png]