Firmware 3.19.16

Egika

@Alpha-156.42 what exactly is strange here? The numbers seem to make sense on first glance.

Alpha 156.42

@Egika I think spm is steps per minute, can you explain to me what spm in the image shows?

ShinJCD

Recovery value is still not synced between watch and app… anyway a good update, keep it up

A Former User

@ShinJCD Now it works fine for me. At first it seemed not, but after a while it synchronised.

ShinJCD

@6iovanni said in Firmware 3.19.16:

@ShinJCD Now it works fine for me. At first it seemed not, but after a while it synchronised.

I still have different values ‍

Egika

@Alpha-156.42 maybe I still don’t understand your question, because for me it is very clear.
rpm: how many steps (left foot to left foot) you did on average per minute (<- this has been the Suunto approach to steps in other models)
spm: how many steps (left foot to right foot) you did on average per minute.

spm = 2x rpm. the maths seem to be correct.

A Former User

Pause/resume reminder

In my opinion, it is still a little sensitive

isazi

@brechtvb maybe Suunto will do the same for other watches too

9ppuser

@isazi Thanks for the update. Unfortunately, two things I would have liked to see in the update are not included.

an option for “raise to wake up” - display only, not fully awake!
global switch for sounds and vibrations off

ShinJCD

@ShinJCD said in Firmware 3.19.16:

@6iovanni said in Firmware 3.19.16:

@ShinJCD Now it works fine for me. At first it seemed not, but after a while it synchronised.

I still have different values ‍

I solved it with the restore.

Returning to the update, for me the option to reduce the minimum time for the display to turn off is still missing, since 5 seconds are already more than enough (the minimum that is now, that is 10 seconds, is definitely too much). Furthermore, I do not see anywhere the option to activate/deactivate automatic brightness (I understand that there is a display brightness sensor anyway).

A Former User

@ShinJCD said in Firmware 3.19.16:

since 5 seconds are already more than enough

Yep!

danyel

@isazi said in Firmware 3.19.16:

Support for cycling power meters

Oh wow, that’s quite big, really makes the Run a proper watch for triathlon.

brechtvb

@danyel I wonder, is the suunto run compatible with a seperate cadence and speed meter?

Linking a garmin cadence and speed meter is not possible.

ShinJCD

This afternoon’s run: same 1km route repeated 8 times (4 out and 4 back). The GPS position at the start is already completely off, the road is quite narrow (two cars can barely fit) so all the gap you see in the various passages is definitely too much. All this to say that, if it’s true that the chipset is the same as the higher models, either it isn’t or there’s some problem in the firmware here too.

A Former User

@ShinJCD Uh! I’m assuming you waited for a GPS fix and synced your watch before the activity, right? You didn’t say: multiband?

ShinJCD

@6iovanni said in Firmware 3.19.16:

@ShinJCD Uh! I’m assuming you waited for a GPS fix and synced your watch before the activity, right? You didn’t say: multiband?

Yes to both questions (although I’m not 100% sure about the multi and), and it’s not the first time that I’ve had such crazy results, only this time they were quite significant.

A Former User

@ShinJCD If it keeps recurring as you say, I would send all the gory details to support via SA (feedback).

although I’m not 100% sure about the multi and

battery set to Performance

Mff73

@ShinJCD
In term of GPS accuracy, one day can be “bad”, and in parallel to chipset, each watch also have its specific antenna.
That said, this track is not super good.

ShinJCD

@6iovanni said in Firmware 3.19.16:

@ShinJCD If it keeps recurring as you say, I would send all the gory details to support via SA (feedback).

although I’m not 100% sure about the multi and

battery set to Performance

Yep

ShinJCD

@Mff73 said in Firmware 3.19.16:

@ShinJCD
In term of GPS accuracy, one day can be “bad”, and in parallel to chipset, each watch also have its specific antenna.
That said, this track is not super good.

In fact, as I was saying, it’s something I noticed right away. And that’s not a good thing, because it’s one thing to flaunt technical data to showcase a sportswatch’s features, but it’s another thing for these features to be real and usable by the end user.