Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    SV clocking a 7.9mi loop at 8.15mi. Is this the general margin of error with Suunto?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto Vertical
    25 Posts 12 Posters 1.3k Views 12 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • EzioAuditoreE Offline
      EzioAuditore Gold Members @zhang965
      last edited by

      @zhang965 I don’t care about added values. Its a forum after all not a scientific publishing platform 🙂

      Suunto watches: Ocean (Sand), Race (Titanium Charcoal), Vertical (Titanium Solar Sand), 9 Baro (Ambassador Edition), Spartan Ultra (Copper Edition), Ambit 2, S6
      Suunto Wing

      zhang965Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • zhang965Z Offline
        zhang965 @EzioAuditore
        last edited by

        @Hristijan-Petreski said in SV clocking a 7.9mi loop at 8.15mi. Is this the general margin of error with Suunto?:

        @zhang965 I don’t care about added values. Its a forum after all not a scientific publishing platform 🙂

        It’s why you are not Suunto’s target audience.

        Winners Wear Winners

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -2
        • A Offline
          altcmd Silver Members @zhang965
          last edited by

          @zhang965 is this your idea of entertainment? thought you found greener pastured on Garmin - how is the Garmin forum?

          zhang965Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Brad_OlwinB Offline
            Brad_Olwin Moderator @EzioAuditore
            last edited by

            @Hristijan-Petreski Interesting as my AWUltra is often less distance than the Vertical and I think (I cannot be fully certain, maybe I should test the loop I have used a wheel to measure distance) the Ultra is measuring short.

            Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing

            EzioAuditoreE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • zhang965Z Offline
              zhang965 @altcmd
              last edited by

              @altcmd said in SV clocking a 7.9mi loop at 8.15mi. Is this the general margin of error with Suunto?:

              @zhang965 is this your idea of entertainment? thought you found greener pastured on Garmin - how is the Garmin forum?

              Garmin’s forum is boring, less entertainment then Suunto community forum.

              Winners Wear Winners

              tazidenT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • tazidenT Offline
                taziden Gold Members @zhang965
                last edited by

                @zhang965 said in SV clocking a 7.9mi loop at 8.15mi. Is this the general margin of error with Suunto?:

                Garmin’s forum is boring, less entertainment then Suunto community forum.

                So you’ve already been banned over there, aren’t you luv.

                S9PP

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • leafs93L Offline
                  leafs93 Bronze Member @Andrew_
                  last edited by

                  @Andrewx01 I faced the exact same issue. I have a Garmin 965, COROS apex 2 pro, Apple Watch 8 and I do wear my vertical together with the rest of my watches just to test out the distances. The distance on my Vertical will invariably be clocked at longer distance , ie for a 10km run , it will be 200m longer for my vertical compared to Garmin 965 and COROS apex 2 pro.

                  When I use software to zoom in to the tracks, I can then understand where the extra distance came from as vertical tracks are more often zig Zac compared to the rest and I figured that must have been the reason. However, it seems vertical has the most accurate distance count by the experts. So I guess it should be.

                  zhang965Z 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • zhang965Z Offline
                    zhang965 @leafs93
                    last edited by

                    @leafs93 said in SV clocking a 7.9mi loop at 8.15mi. Is this the general margin of error with Suunto?:

                    @Andrewx01 I faced the exact same issue. I have a Garmin 965, COROS apex 2 pro, Apple Watch 8 and I do wear my vertical together with the rest of my watches just to test out the distances. The distance on my Vertical will invariably be clocked at longer distance , ie for a 10km run , it will be 200m longer for my vertical compared to Garmin 965 and COROS apex 2 pro.

                    When I use software to zoom in to the tracks, I can then understand where the extra distance came from as vertical tracks are more often zig Zac compared to the rest and I figured that must have been the reason. However, it seems vertical has the most accurate distance count by the experts. So I guess it should be.

                    My vertical counts less distance when I run a little bit fast,; if I walk, it gives almost the same distance as epix2pro.

                    I saw Suunto’s tester was running at 16mins/km to proof the good gps tracker, sadly I cannot keep running in such a pace.

                    Have you tried run slower to see your vertical gps performance?

                    Winners Wear Winners

                    leafs93L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • Mouse CruiserM Offline
                      Mouse Cruiser Bronze Member @Andrew_
                      last edited by Mouse Cruiser

                      @Andrewx01 IMHO the matter is quite simple. For example, if you take a perfectly flat road and measure a distance of 1 mile, a watch that measures the GPS location every second will make a tiny error in each measurement. If you run a mile in 5 minutes, that’s at least 300 locations and 300 small misses. The algorithm (and each watch manufacturer has different algoritm) compensates these small errors, of course, but in the end there is still a deviation from the measurement in a straight line and the calculation of the path after 300 locations. In your case the error is around 3 %, which could be smaller, but it could also be larger😕

                      Suunto Vertical
                      Suunto 9 Baro
                      Suunto Spartan
                      Suunto Ambit3 peak

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • EzioAuditoreE Offline
                        EzioAuditore Gold Members @Brad_Olwin
                        last edited by

                        @Brad_Olwin Yes usually my AW gives me less distance too from cold start (their not so clever implementation to start the activity within 3 sec might be the case. So what I usually do is start an activity stop it after 5-10 sec - delete it and start again so the GPS lock should be much better).

                        Suunto watches: Ocean (Sand), Race (Titanium Charcoal), Vertical (Titanium Solar Sand), 9 Baro (Ambassador Edition), Spartan Ultra (Copper Edition), Ambit 2, S6
                        Suunto Wing

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • leafs93L Offline
                          leafs93 Bronze Member @zhang965
                          last edited by

                          @zhang965 walking will definitely get more distance as the gps track will not be smooth and is more zig Zac.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy