Sleep score
-
In comparing Vertical to S9PP, I’m finding consistently lower scores with vertical and the sleep quality % doesn’t seem to change much.
I found 9PP to vary and did match how I felt for good sleeps.
Vertical : if I get a bad sleep, it’s in the 60% range. Last night, amazing sleep, 8 hours, low resting HR: 62%. 9PP would have given me an 80%+.
Is the new algorithm with increased HR sampling more accurate, so maybe 9PP was more up beat , and vertical more accurate?
I did get one terrible sleep with Vertical when had to get up early - 4 hours sleep - and it said 40%.
Anyone else have similar experiences?
-
I think you are right. I‘ve got similar settings of HR and so on on my Vertical as I had on my S9PP… and I mean the sleep is judged not so good as a view weeks ago… but this is like a case report, and not a double-blinded study!
-
@mikekoski490 My experience is the same. When I got the Vertical my first night was 90+%, like with S9PP, after that it went drastically down (also had 40% once). I have tried to sleep a few times with both watches just to compare and Vertical has always lower sleep quality and resources. Tonight I tried again and the result is:
Vertical
Quality: 80%
Duration: 8:35
Average HR: 59
Fell asleep: 22:43
Woke up: 7:20
Time awake: 0:02
Deep sleep: 4:21S9PP
Quality: 97%
Duration: 8:38
Average HR: 60
Fell asleep: 22:43
Woke up: 7:23
Time awake: 0:01
Deep sleep: 3:45No idea which one is correct.
-
Now it’s constantly in the 60-70% range. I have no idea why. Would be great to have insight how this is calculated and if the algorithm is different compared to S9PP
