-
well … about the 10 min graph …
-
@sartoric don’t put salt, we know where we left last time
-
@slash point taken
-
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos same here. Sometimes it needs over a minute. Definitly a bug.
-
Moved to lounge.
-
Yeah not much faith in the instant HR. Shows 72 or doesn’t change if I increase activity. Stays the same until it times out and goes back to the main watch face. WHR seems to be fine during runs/excerise. Actually better than before the update. Any news on a bug fix? Or maybe I should try and reinstall the update, maybe that would fix it?
-
@barfoot what is the WHR version on your wathc ?
Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
Creator of quantified-self.io a portal that allows you to analyze your data from various providers, upload fit activity files to Suunto app, gpx routes and more… -
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos its a Sport Wrist Hr All Black. Or do you mean the Valencell version?
-
@barfoot VAllencel version
Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
Creator of quantified-self.io a portal that allows you to analyze your data from various providers, upload fit activity files to Suunto app, gpx routes and more… -
@dimitrios-kanellopoulos Valencellsays 6571 in the settings. Am I looking in the right spot?
-
@barfoot yup that is the latest.
-
This still seems to be a bit buggy in .42, Valancell 6571.
Observed: swipe to instant HR, a number is displayed. This number is usually static, then reverts to the 72 number.
Expected: dynamic number reflecting HR.
Bug, or are my expectations incorrect?
-
@ze-stuart static number is last your hr, 72 number is starting point before hr lock and this should go away as misleading customers
-
@Ze-Stuart
Anyway, just wait 30 sec, more or less,than you should see hr refresh -
@sartoric said in [Watch] Instant HR on new firmware 2.0.40 (spartan):
@Ze-Stuart
Anyway, just wait 30 sec, more or less,than you should see hr refresh30 secs are not instant HR. So, this is not working atm
-
30 seconds should be the maximum time to fully initiate it, afterwards it should be “real real time”
-
@yannis-belouris
30 sec is (maybe was ?) the time frame needed to have a valid HR sampling.If I remember well (I don’t have one) it’s the same for hr belt
-
@sartoric said in [Watch] Instant HR on new firmware 2.0.40 (spartan):
@yannis-belouris
30 sec is (maybe was ?) the time frame needed to have a valid HR sampling.If I remember well (I don’t have one) it’s the same for hr belt
My opinion is that we are mistaking a valid engineering limitation (30 secs) with a possible solution like sampling every minute and displaying this until a valid current HR sample.
We need to strive for an excellent customer experience despite hardware limitations
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login