Suunto 9 Peak Pro?
-
My two cents. I rather stay with a watch that does not become unusable because of new functions requiring better hardware to be functional than having all the new and being forced to replace my watch, as it happens so often with other tech items. To be honest, the only time I have been really angry with suunto was when they removed functionalities form A3P in the transition to the App. I am OK now, but I could have stayed perfectly fine with my A3P if wireless sync was preserved. Maybe it is because I am a very basic user or I bought the watch with some specific things in mind.
The bugs thing is quite different in my opinión. Although the bugs I found are really really rare and do not dramatically affect the use of the wathc in my case.
J
-
@DMytro said in Suunto 9 Peak Pro?:
@BinoWorld-UK tbh suunto still releases features to 4yo+ watch, I wonder if Garmin still pushes updates to Fenix 5.
I would have loved even more feature to be released, just so that the watch feels fresh, but I think suunto+ features and guides were kind of great updates and the app keeps improving as well.
I think the correct comparison would be the 5plus, both launched in 2018. And if so, yes still new updates and featuresDon’t want to sound harsh, but the fenix 5 plus already had more features from the beginning than the Suunto 9. Maps for example.
Also on Garmin’s defense, you have a 20 year old watch and it still connects online (I had garmin swim 1 for example). On my side this gives me confidence on the brand.
I often see here opinions that it seems that today, garmin or others, when implement features it is a life of crashes.
I think we are not in the old times. Often a reset solves it. And from what I see , the Suunto times after the ambit 3 are full of them also…
I think we can’t blame Suunto, they were always like this , not much openness , cautious on what do they get out. The only thing (on my opinion) is that before the other players were much worse on stability/offer or features. Now they aren’t.
But they should have their business model ok because after all this years they are here and they are bringing new stuff for their users and they seem somehow be happy about it (let’s not forget the days that movescount crashed quite a lot, that movescount app was a pain and Suunto app was no good). I think they are on the good way. If enough to people put their money ? Only each knows and they should know also
Let’s see what the peak pro brings! -
@André-Faria sure, f5 had some features that s9 still doesn’t have, but the latest beta you’ve sent had almost exclusively the bug fixes, while s9 is getting some beefy updates.
I’m just saying, it’s nice to see thats suunto supports semi-old watches. As for which brand is better/more loyal/etc, I leave it for everyone to decide for themselves.
-
-
@André-Faria yes it had more features, but worse GPS, altimeter, and battery life than the S9. Oh and let’s not talk about the issue with the Bluetooth and ANT+ antenna that would disconnect all the time (it’s even in the comments in Ray’s reviews). Also, only the more expensive F5X had maps. But the S9 is a newer watch, so comparison is not fair anyway. I had both F5S and F5, it wasn’t a great watch, I sold the s and send the normal unit back to Amazon for a refund.
-
@BinoWorld-UK I do not know how decisions are made regarding features but the SuuntoPlus Guides have a tremendous flexibility and allow Suunto to customize features and provide flexibility that they did not have before. The S7 was an interesting experiment, the development produced an end product that Suunto considered finished I guess.
As for comparing with competitors, I think the map implementation on the S7 is better than any other. I bought and used an Epix 2 for ~8 months, did several races with it and eventually sold it. There were too many issues that I did not like. Having maps is nice but on a small screen they are less useful than I imagined. Using maps on the Garmin seriously reduces battery estimates as well. So there are trade offs using maps, they also reduce battery life on the S7 if a route is loaded.
Suunto does add requested features as I have stated before. They may not implement them as you might expect. For example, myself and many others requested offline syncing for Ambits. We got offline syncing but not the way we expected, it came with the transition to a mobile app and the introduction of the Spartan line.
-
@Brad_Olwin I have to agree with you the S7 mapping capabilities on that quality screen is the best however, the S7 hasn’t received a single additional feature since the release. No suunto plus or virtual partner…
-
@BinoWorld-UK I do think Suunto considers the S7 as an Apple Watch equivalent and not a dedicated sport watch. Hence, no Guides, Ghost Runner, etc. For this type of watch the sports features are equivalent or better than competitors. If an updates comes, I would expect different hardware.
-
The best thing about s7 is the screen and I still waiting for a new Suunto watch with a amoled screen
I don’t now if it comes but I hope for it -
@isazi The whole Ant+ thing is still an issue with Garmin. In order for me to use external sensors like the STRYD foot pod, I have to use my Suunto 9 Baro because it has a way better connection via Bluetooth. I literally disconnected my STRYD from Garmin because it was always behind. STRYD also seems to make excuses for Garmin in this regard and they refuse to disclose any information as to why the connection with Garmin products is so bad. They literally tell you not to connect to Garmin via Bluetooth. Garmin’s Bluetooth connection is apparently useless. Suunto may not have a ton of features, but it works the way I need it to work…every time. My only complaint with Suunto is the terrible OHR and the lag. Other than that it’s a reliable product.
-
In next days, someone will explain you Suunto has the best ohr, it’s parfait for himself, blablabla
-
@zhang965
OHR in S9B is basically useless (for me, my opinion).
I couldn’t do sports without my verity sense. -
@freeheeler btw, after I changed to an elastic hook and loop strap, my ohr improved by much. Not to say its good, but not terrible. So I use ohr for the activities where I care little about instant HR and more so about the average. I coud indeed get rid of huge spikes and drops and cadence lock, so I’m satisfied.
-
@DMytro
the way I like to wear my watch doesn’t help for good OHR reading. I know that a better watch with better OHR will improve, but still isn’t up to my verity sense
I simply don’t like sitting a watch too tight.
I like my watch like I like my ski bindings: relatively loose at some parts
-
@freeheeler still, I’d suggest you give it a shot. It is tight but doesn’t feel like it.
-
@DMytro
do you have a link? you can also pm me -
The OHR doesn‘t work on tattoed sleeves since the last update. Really terrible SW-work from suunto. I will give them one last chance with the next update….or i will start a new adventure with polar
-
@cosme-costa Less than 24 h now if this teaser was the real deal
-
OHR is terrible for me also, in running in particular. It tends to read around 20/30 bpm more. I have tried many times with different positions, configurations… No success. If I wear my wife’s Apple Watch, the readings are almost perfect.
J
-
@Efejota
which model do you have?living sideways
