Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Difference between Activity total ascent and Sum up SP Climb Hill

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto 9 Peak
    4 Posts 2 Posters 188 Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K Online
      Kramble
      last edited by

      Hi Suunto community,
      During my trail activity this morning I noticed on my S9P a gap between the activity total ascent and the ascent of each hill read on the Suunto Plus Climb Hill screen.
      (The weather was good with no atmospheric variation)
      At each climb, the Suunto Plus Climb Hill ascent seems to match perfectly with my expectation based on the main altitude field at the down and at the top of the hill, but the Activity total ascent misses from 2 to 5 meters each time.
      At the end after 11 climbs in 2 hours, when I sum up mentally the Suunto Plus Clim Hill screen ascent of each climb I found 683 m but the Activity total ascent show me 645m (And for me it matters a lot šŸ˜‰ )
      Furthermore the record of my activity on the Suunto App show the shorter ascents on each climb rather than Suunto Plus Clim Hill ascents viewed on my screen during the activity.
      I know that there is a link with the 3m increment of the algorithm of ascent calculating and I read that you, @Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos, are working on a fix with rolling hills.
      Is that the same issue ?
      Why do not ā€œtrustā€ the SP climb hill ascent field ?

      By the way, thanks to Dimitrios (off course) and Isazi, Brad… for your precious help on this forum.

      Ambit 3 peak saphir
      Spartan Ultra (sold)
      S7 graphite copper
      S9 peak all black
      Vertical titanium green forest
      Wings

      Dimitrios KanellopoulosD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
        Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Kramble
        last edited by

        @kramble yes. Next firmware should improve that quite a lot.

        Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
        Creator of Quantified-Self.io
        youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
        https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
        https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Dimitrios KanellopoulosD Offline
          Dimitrios Kanellopoulos Community Manager @Kramble
          last edited by

          @kramble for example if your hill is 41m then due to the 3m chuncks the last 2m (40, 41) might not get recorded if you don’t pass 41meters. Does it make sense ?

          So in 11 repeats you loose 2x11 meters

          Community Manager / Admin @Suunto
          Creator of Quantified-Self.io
          youtube.com/c/dimitrioskanellopoulos
          https://instagram.com/dimitrioskanellopoulos
          https://www.strava.com/athletes/7586105

          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K Online
            Kramble @Dimitrios Kanellopoulos
            last edited by

            @dimitrios-kanellopoulos it makes totally sense , except I am pretty sure to have several times a difference superior to 2 meters like 3, 4 and maybe 5 meters.

            Ambit 3 peak saphir
            Spartan Ultra (sold)
            S7 graphite copper
            S9 peak all black
            Vertical titanium green forest
            Wings

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post

            Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy