Suunto OW202?

dulko79

@freeheeler in the end they all leak it, just timing must be right.

Ze Stuart

@aleksander-h with the 9 Baro being OW-193 and the 9 Peak being OW-194, I don’t think they’re random at all, we just don’t know the pattern Suunto uses to assign them.

If there’s already an OW-201, eh, updated thingy, that’s nice. If there’s no OW-201, it’s exciting.

@freeheeler “Exigua est virtus servare silentium, sed culpa gravis esse loqui de quibus didicit.” (Pūblius Ovidius Nāsō) [or something like that]

@dulko79 well said.

DMytro

@ze-stuart a new watch combining diving computer and an outdoor watch maybe?

Speculation ON

A completely new line of sport watches?
From OW194 of Peak until OW202 you have 8. In other hand you can get big discounts around the world on Suunto products, around 30-40%…
Can be possible?

Ze Stuart

@дима-мельниченко I’d love that.

StefanoMorgan

I think it’s a new watch with all the changes from mr-pvc

Aleksander H

The Suunto 9 got smaller and sleaker. The Suunto 7 got a titanium edition. I’m guessing it’s the Suunto 5 turn to get a new improved version.

Suunto 7 with newer android wear?
I think that or a newer 9 with same hardware as the peak, it would make sense for the fans of big watches, for the range…to have a “competitor” to the F6/F6X Sapphire just like the S9P “compeats” with F6SS.
Let’s wait to see.
Honestly I am more curious about software news than the “hardware”. I think with the peak, regarding hardware Suunto is already doing very good.

Aleksander H

@andré-faria said in Suunto OW202?:

Suunto 7 with newer android wear?

Doubt it. Seems like Wear 3.0 right now is an exclusive club consisting of Samsung and Google. Obviously others will get access, but seems they are putting the spotlight on Samsung for now.

Ze Stuart

@andré-faria I doubt it, as no WiFi is listed in the spec: I can’t see an Android Wear not having WiFi. Its only connectivity is Bluetooth and GNSS.

@Aleksander-H your logic is sound, but the 5’s model number is OW-186, and based on the other model numbers I’d expect a new 5 to be OW-187. (Interestingly the 7 is OW-185, making me think OW-18* is mid-tier.)

I’ve done some heavy Googling - and I’m open to have missed something - but I can’t find a Suunto product line that starts with OW-2**. I can’t find a photo of the back of the D5, though.

TonyG

@ze-stuart " I can’t find a photo of the back of the D5, though."
I think its DW-182

DMytro

@t1sugar so it’s not a diving watch then. What about s3? It’s the oldest in the lineup, isn’t it?

ink357

The 9P was made for adventurer, maybe a new watch for runners ? Is there a baro in the spec ?

Ze Stuart

@ink357 I don’t think the FCC cares about a manometer: only devices that interact with radio waves, so only the Bluetooth and GNSS components are listed.

zhang965

@ze-stuart said in Suunto OW202?:

@ink357 I don’t think the FCC cares about a manometer: only devices that interact with radio waves, so only the Bluetooth and GNSS components are listed.

So, have you found something new?

I’ve checked someting and I think it could be a new suunto 5.

the spartan trainer is ow 163 (released about 2017)
Suunto 5 (Suunto trainer 2) is ow 186 (released about 2019)
and OW 202 could be …?

spartan ultra is ow 161 (2016)
S9 is ow 183 (2019)
S9P is OW 194 (2021)

@zhang965 Reading tea leaves and bone cracks, here’s a thought though: a big reason for people to pick up S5 was the size, no? Apart from baro and a few other things, I’d say S9 and S5 are totally equivalent. Now S9P takes the size argument away.

Where does it leave S5? What can it possibly offer over S9P other than price? And what’s gonna get removed feature- or hardware-wise to make said price?

Also, if all recent models of the past few series were codenamed OW-1xx, under 200, wouldn’t it suggest 200+ is something quite new and not a continuation of existing lines?

My bet is a mythical S11, with LifQ OHR sensor package, a new processor and expanded memory capable of running multiple S+ fields and perhaps structured workouts plans from places like TP and FinalSurge. Maybe, a Fenix 6X like 1.4” MIPS display, with ALS similar to A9P. Who knows? Ambit like user programmed data fields via S+ public API and such?

Either that, or a new diving watch that, like Garmin Descent, will combine both daily tracking/sports and diving.

dulko79

@nickk S5 could follow new design of S9 Peak with new internals and with lower grade materials. That would mean lower price, interesting for someone who does not want to spend 500+ € for a sport watch. And let’s not forget adaptive training, it was available only for S3/5. Maybe not interesting for serious athletes but nice feature for ordinary people looking for variety in sport activities.

zhang965

@zhang965 said in Suunto OW202?:

@ze-stuart said in Suunto OW202?:

@ink357 I don’t think the FCC cares about a manometer: only devices that interact with radio waves, so only the Bluetooth and GNSS components are listed.

So, have you found something new?

I’ve checked someting and I think it could be a new suunto 5.

the spartan trainer is ow 163 (released about 2017)
Suunto 5 (Suunto trainer 2) is ow 186 (released about 2019)
and OW 202 could be …?

spartan ultra is ow 161 (2016)
S9 is ow 183 (2019)
S9P is OW 194 (2021)

And, OW202 marks Hardward version as C4 with SW version 2,16.

And, it seems all flagship Watchs had censored name in fccid.io ? like spartan ultra, ambit3 peak and 9, 9 peak are all called Sports watch with GPS and BLE Connectivity,

but the lower watchs had the real name? as suunto 5, 7, trainer

I don’t think suunto will soonly release a new top line watch,

zhang965

@nickk said in Suunto OW202?:

@zhang965 Reading tea leaves and bone cracks, here’s a thought though: a big reason for people to pick up S5 was the size, no? Apart from baro and a few other things, I’d say S9 and S5 are totally equivalent. Now S9P takes the size argument away.

Where does it leave S5? What can it possibly offer over S9P other than price? And what’s gonna get removed feature- or hardware-wise to make said price?

Also, if all recent models of the past few series were codenamed OW-1xx, under 200, wouldn’t it suggest 200+ is something quite new and not a continuation of existing lines?

My bet is a mythical S11, with LifQ OHR sensor package, a new processor and expanded memory capable of running multiple S+ fields and perhaps structured workouts plans from places like TP and FinalSurge. Maybe, a Fenix 6X like 1.4” MIPS display, with ALS similar to A9P. Who knows? Ambit like user programmed data fields via S+ public API and such?

Either that, or a new diving watch that, like Garmin Descent, will combine both daily tracking/sports and diving.

I might be agree with you about the new flagship, but the problem is the S lines are sharing the same firmware to simplify the dev. So, in my point of view, there is no need to just release a new flagship to complete the features. excepting adding (something like )a map on the watch, but… I don’t think the Suunto’s own firmware will get it.

If it’s a new physic appearance, well, I think the S9P is the top one, excepting suunto adds a solar power on S9P call it S9P solar or something and call it Suunto 9 ultra peak?

The nightmare could be… a suunto 9 peak without baro… Like suunto did once for suunto 9. When 9 was released, 9 had had baro, just a couple of weeks later… they call the original suunto 9 as baro, and a new suunto 9 for…no-baro.

So, I think the ow 202 could be… Suunto 5 peak…which is the new look for S5? (but I think S5 is more like the ambit serie)

suzzlo

Are these numbers Suunto’s responsibility or are they assigned by FCC?

For me S5P could make sense.

This is my whishlist:

New GNSS
New BT5.0
LiveQ HR + SOp2
Updated HW
Baro (please please please)
300€
S9P like design (like S3 but with GPS)
Smaller battery
Training Peaks integration
Firstbeat metrics (with adaptative training)

Love that!

BR