Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    OHR accuracy of owners of Race 2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto Race 2
    45 Posts 20 Posters 6.5k Views 18 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Tomas5T Offline
      Tomas5 Gold Members
      last edited by

      With old Suunto 5 i hade from time to time crazy high HR measurement using OHR sensor. At least this didn’t occured yet on Race 2. So big improvement in that for my.

      Suunto Ambit 2 > Suunto 5 > Suunto Race 2

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        Matteiva @Tomas5
        last edited by Matteiva

        @Tomas5 🙂 in 10 years that’s the worst OHR I have ever seen for me while running

        chest are always the best for specific workout, but for daily training or trail a good OHR should be enough, I use both chest and ohr, but very disappointed with the race 2, meaning I can not train with it’s ohr 🙂

        G G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • G Offline
          gogapo @Matteiva
          last edited by

          @Matteiva I’ve been having a few problems with my Race 2, but OHR isn’t one of them — it’s actually been quite good, to be fair. Much better than my previous Coros Pace 3.

          Today I did a 45-minute workout: 5 minutes in zone 1, 30 minutes in zone 2, and 10 minutes in zones 4 and 5. The watch performed impeccably in terms of OHR accuracy, as you can see here

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • G Offline
            Gunnar Bronze Member @Matteiva
            last edited by

            @Matteiva hey, I am curious. Which OHR did you use 10 years ago? Must have been one of the first gadgets.

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              Matteiva @Gunnar
              last edited by

              @Gunnar Tomtom watch, maybe not 10 but 8 🙂 ohr was better 🙂

              G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                Matteiva @gogapo
                last edited by

                @gogapo it surely depends per individual, skin tone, pilosity, and veins

                I always used same strong nylon scratch band since garmin fenix 6x

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • G Offline
                  Gunnar Bronze Member @Matteiva
                  last edited by Gunnar

                  @Matteiva I just read a review of the Tomtom runner 3. Same user experience as today for current watches. Nothing changed apparently 😉

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    Matteiva @Gunnar
                    last edited by Matteiva

                    @Gunnar 🙂 yes I remember it was almost 10 bits above my real heart rate, but race 2 was 25/30 yesterday evening, during all my activity 🙂

                    And garmin epix pro 2 was spot on most of the time, same type of band same personn ( me ! )

                    Hoping a fix soon

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J Offline
                      jsmno
                      last edited by

                      Hi everyone. I am new to this forum. And I am the owner of my first Suunto device.
                      I really like the Race 2. They have a nice weight, a nice large display, and easy control with the digital crown.
                      What I am disappointed with is the quality of the OHR measurement. Today I had a light running workout in zone 1-2 during which I can breathe through my nose easily. From the chest strap I know that at this pace my heart rate is around 130-140. I ran downhill and my heart rate was 164-172. This is the heart rate I get during interval training!
                      I feel like my old Garmin Fenix ​​6 pro was more accurate. I know that OHR can’t record sudden changes in pace, but at the same pace it measures 20-30 beats more. I really don’t understand this and I’m afraid it’s more of a hardware issue than a software one.
                      I have white skin. Original suunto textile strap. Tight enough.

                      I have an ultramarathon coming up this weekend and I’m angry that I can’t rely on the watch. I don’t feel like wearing a chest strap for 100km…

                      VoiGASV Brad_OlwinB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • VoiGASV Online
                        VoiGAS Gold Members @jsmno
                        last edited by

                        @jsmno Unfortunatly Downhill the watches OHR have problems with “cadence lock” because it believes the movements are your heartbeat…
                        But as far as I know all manufacturers have this problem, interesting to hear that Garmin seems to be better in this aspect


                        Race S
                        Vertical Titanium Solar
                        Ambit3 Vertical

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          Matteiva @VoiGAS
                          last edited by

                          @VoiGAS there is absolutaly no doubt that garmin since fenix 6 has good ohr. Tested race 2 for few more runs this week, even shaving the skin, measures still a total disaster.

                          Jean-Philippe REYJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • Jean-Philippe REYJ Offline
                            Jean-Philippe REY @Matteiva
                            last edited by

                            @Matteiva I also shave m’y wrist ,🤣 but the result was not effective.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • Brad_OlwinB Offline
                              Brad_Olwin Moderator @jsmno
                              last edited by

                              @jsmno OHR on any watch for me is problematic. I’ve tried most of them. Because ZoneSense is so useful I use the Suunto belt most of the time and when running ultra races. I think OHR is highly variable based on individuals because of the underlying technology.

                              Vector/T6c/Ambit 3 Peak/S5 Copper/S3/S7 Ti/S9 baro Ti/S9P Ti/S9PP Ti/Vertical Ti/Race Ti/RaceS/Ocean/Wing/Race2Ti

                              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • S Offline
                                Shrek3k @Brad_Olwin
                                last edited by

                                @Brad_Olwin fully agree, OHR for me is always spot on with Vertical 1 with the velcro-band and a quite tight fit.

                                using a Suunto Vertical & Suunto Wings; mostly running (AKA stomping around) and cycling through the northern german "wilderness", and wherever else I have the chance to do so
                                OS - Android 16/Pixel Pro 7

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • L Offline
                                  larrybbaker
                                  last edited by larrybbaker

                                  3 days now with Race 2. OHR seems very accurate in 24x7, walking and a 30 minute Zwift ride today.

                                  Vertical Ti Solar
                                  Race 2
                                  iPhone 17 Pro

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • M Offline
                                    Matteiva
                                    last edited by

                                    I am starting to think that some Race 2 got OHR problems, software or hardware ?

                                    I ran a first and perfect 10k with a fresh new Vertical 2, spot on from start to finish, with the same nylon stretch band than Race 2, same individual.

                                    For reminder, for me with this Race 2
                                    8k 5:35mn/km 160 average most often 165/170
                                    Then
                                    8k 4:43mn/km 138 average with some 120 at 4:00mn/k

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Tomas5T Offline
                                      Tomas5 Gold Members
                                      last edited by

                                      Here is comparison of Suunto 5 (with Suunto Smart Sensor) vs Suunto Race 2 (OHR). I had Race 2 tight enough but still comfortible. It is possible to tighten it one hole more but than it is not comfortable to wear anymore.
                                      amCharts.png

                                      Suunto Ambit 2 > Suunto 5 > Suunto Race 2

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • First post
                                        Last post

                                      Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy