Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    OHR accuracy of owners of Race 2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Suunto Race 2
    36 Posts 17 Posters 3.1k Views 15 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • EgikaE Online
      Egika Platinum Member @Tomas5
      last edited by

      @Tomas5 with almost every Suunto watch I had bad OHR readings when riding my bike.
      Usually it would eventually just fall into the lower 80s and stay there.

      Race 2 was the first watch to ever got OHR in cycling right for me! ๐Ÿ™‚

      t6, S6, Elementum Terra, Ambit 3 Sapphire, Spartan Ultra Copper, Traverse Alpha, S7 Graphite LE, S9B Ambassador, S9P Granite Blue Titanium, S9PP Titanium Sand, Vertical All Black, Race Titanium Charcoal, Race S All Black / Titanium Courtney, Run Lime

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • M Offline
        Matteiva @Tomas5
        last edited by Matteiva

        @Tomas5 Mine is 100% offโ€ฆ See my report https://forum.suunto.com/post/177055

        With screen capture, same evening first 10k easy with suunto ohr 165/170โ€ฆ
        Then another last km with polar chest just to confirm I was not crazy or hill ๐Ÿ™‚

        Same pace in both case 5:35 per km

        9089.jpg 9091.jpg

        Tomas5T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Tomas5T Offline
          Tomas5 Gold Members @Matteiva
          last edited by

          @Matteiva my test from bike ride turned out good. Comparing to chest strap. I will do similar for walking activities. I am suspiciouse there is possible cadence lock when watch is not tight on your wrist. But i will see after comparison with chest strap. Hope i will find time to test this week.

          Suunto Ambit 2, Suunto 5, Suunto Race 2

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Tomas5T Offline
            Tomas5 Gold Members
            last edited by

            With old Suunto 5 i hade from time to time crazy high HR measurement using OHR sensor. At least this didnโ€™t occured yet on Race 2. So big improvement in that for my.

            Suunto Ambit 2, Suunto 5, Suunto Race 2

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              Matteiva @Tomas5
              last edited by Matteiva

              @Tomas5 ๐Ÿ™‚ in 10 years thatโ€™s the worst OHR I have ever seen for me while running

              chest are always the best for specific workout, but for daily training or trail a good OHR should be enough, I use both chest and ohr, but very disappointed with the race 2, meaning I can not train with itโ€™s ohr ๐Ÿ™‚

              G G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G Offline
                gogapo @Matteiva
                last edited by

                @Matteiva Iโ€™ve been having a few problems with my Race 2, but OHR isnโ€™t one of them โ€” itโ€™s actually been quite good, to be fair. Much better than my previous Coros Pace 3.

                Today I did a 45-minute workout: 5 minutes in zone 1, 30 minutes in zone 2, and 10 minutes in zones 4 and 5. The watch performed impeccably in terms of OHR accuracy, as you can see here

                Suunto Race 2

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • G Online
                  Gunnar Bronze Member @Matteiva
                  last edited by

                  @Matteiva hey, I am curious. Which OHR did you use 10 years ago? Must have been one of the first gadgets.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    Matteiva @Gunnar
                    last edited by

                    @Gunnar Tomtom watch, maybe not 10 but 8 ๐Ÿ™‚ ohr was better ๐Ÿ™‚

                    G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      Matteiva @gogapo
                      last edited by

                      @gogapo it surely depends per individual, skin tone, pilosity, and veins

                      I always used same strong nylon scratch band since garmin fenix 6x

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • G Online
                        Gunnar Bronze Member @Matteiva
                        last edited by Gunnar

                        @Matteiva I just read a review of the Tomtom runner 3. Same user experience as today for current watches. Nothing changed apparently ๐Ÿ˜‰

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          Matteiva @Gunnar
                          last edited by

                          @Gunnar ๐Ÿ™‚ yes I remember it was almost 10 pulses above my real heart rate, but race 2 was 25/30 yesterday evening, during all my activity ๐Ÿ™‚

                          And garmin epix pro 2 was spot on most of the time, same type of band same personn ( me ! )

                          Hoping a fix soon

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post

                          Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy