Wished HR sensor was more accurate...
-
New topic as Steps wildly innacurate was a bit sidetracked with my comment that 24/7 HR isn’t that great with Suunto.
I mentioned that I recorded an walking activity the other day comparing the Epix Pro (that I considered fairly accurate, unless the software doesn’t want it to be) with an external Coros HRM and the Suunto Race S. Neither watch was good, as the comparison with the HRM shows. Both watches have been worn similar, using a textile velcro strap. Epix left, Race S right arm, HRM on the right upper arm.
The Race S take:
As before the 100-something values are too high. 70-something is really good. 80-something I think is completely usable… It is only the first half that I’m complaining about.
Epix (red) and HRM (blue)
The Epix Pro - at least during running - is usually closer, but here it is about 5-10 beats from the HRM. I would be very happy if the Race S was that good during the day. I have to wear a chest strap anyway - with Garmin because I distrust their software in the Epix Pro and with Suunto because I want ZoneSense…
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login