Data quality

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@sartoric suunto app links please

[sartoric]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos
Ok. I’m not yet familiar with all this devilry

https://www.sports-tracker.com/workout/cristian800101/5b9d49a6b99d9621ed0f8ff2

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@sartoric I see in your photo also some translations wrong ? What language is this ?

[sartoric]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos
Italian. But it looks more as overlapping numbers

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

Unfortunately the buggy version 3.45.0 will habe those zone issues.

I am sorry but this cannot be undone (aka the 3.45 messed it up)

I don’t know what to say except sorry

[sartoric]

Ok. So those few moves are messed up, but a resynchronization could fix it or OHR data are managed in a different way ?
I mean, just for the sake of knowledge, what if I could (but I can’t) delete and sync the moves again ?

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@sartoric that should fix it.

I have been testing 3.45.1 for a week now and did not see any issue

[sartoric]

As expected, new moves look ok.

[Shrek3k]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos here you go with a few additional ones. As mentioned … all zones have been “upped” and therefore pushed the highest one “out”

https://www.sports-tracker.com/workout/an/5b9fe0818bfe5d31b9bd9b52
7:22 min missing

https://www.sports-tracker.com/workout/an/5b9e75bdb99d9621ed2eb0c0
pushed one section up

https://www.sports-tracker.com/workout/an/5b9e31dce883bf557399023e
pushed one section up

https://www.sports-tracker.com/workout/an/5b9d728c8bfe5d3b08aeb9fd
18:08 min missing

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@Shrek3k none of those are new and those are with 3.45 right ?

[Shrek3k]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos yes, all these have been synced to the former version (3.45.0). None of these to the 3.45.1 version ( I removed one where I have been a little bit in doubt …although I still believe …)

[Shrek3k]

@Shrek3k said in Data quality:

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos And I am not quite sure what and how successful sharing is, as I have sent it from one Android device to another - and both currently available browsers on that device (Firefox and Cliqz) are showing the ST website and endlessly rotating loading circle. I have to try again at home with other browsers and on the PC.

Ok … now I know why it did not work … every single entry in ST needs to be set on “visible with link”… otherwise even a shared link (obviously from SA and/or ST does not make any difference) won’t make the entry visible. Not too intuitive … at least not for me.
I will now check, if I can set all entries in ST to “visible with link” as the general setting for my account … and the answer is - no, it can’t be done/set that way.
And an additional issue - on the overview map in ST obviously only places are shown where there have been several activities, but the (for me) more intereseting activities (on-time-events in different places) are not shown on the map, only in the list …
SA handles it perfectly, and shows all activities …

[sartoric]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos
I’ve synched a move some minutes ago, and I’ve noticed something strange in calories count

The strange thing is the total that is higher than the one from the watch even if active cal are correctly (some minutes are passed before I took the pictures) lower.

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@sartoric same here. Let me check.

[sartoric]

@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos
Just some additional info.
Synching this morning seems to fix yesterday’s count (just 1 extra cal in watch total maybe due to rounding) but today’s count isn’t correct.

just my guess

Phone total - Watch tot
1919-1022 = 897

watch active cal = 90 (maybe 89,7 rounded ?)

could it be that
Today’s Phone total = Watch total + watch active (not rounded) x 10

[Dimitrios Kanellopoulos]

@sartoric I spotted the issue. The passive calories are calculated also in the app till the day passes.

[sartoric]

That’s good … well in fact not, but it’s good that the issue has been identified

[A Former User]

Something is off in the altitude chart in SA.
SA altitude graoh is empty for the first 10mins
Anyone noticed something similar?
S9 and MC seem fine

[cosme.costa]

@Yannis-Belouris said in Data quality:

Something is off in the altitude chart in SA.
Anyone noticed something similar?
S9 and MC seem fine

Yes I’ve noticed the same! I like a problem with the scales.