Run 2
-
@TrailEyes Yeah, I don’t imagine he has a direct link to the best information. It’s just a bummer that the confusion happened in the first place.
-
The maps on Run 2 are the same, whatever memory you get.
The difference to the more outdoor and adventure focused watches is that there are no extra labels, like street names, POIs etc. You get contour lines and this is pretty much it.
Good enough to follow a route, a little limited to explore the unknown
-
@GratefulDeadpan Not really cause I can fill more than 10GB with offline music. But each to their own.
-
@Highlands yeah I was obviously talking from my perspective. As in that I wouldn’t have music on the watch at all in the first place—so in other words unused space for me.
-
@Egika Ty! Wonder if Suunto will budge on this given how Coros present maps on Pace 4 which in a way then presents a better value (to some). For me it won’t matter much as I would just need to see where a trail might take me, and if I should choose different and it seems I will be able to make that call with the Run 2.
-
@GratefulDeadpan The point isn’t whether one listens to music or not. I might prefer to stream music on my iPhone. Then I need no space for offline music. But I used to have Race 1 with 16 GB, I travel and it’s not convenient to keep only small amount of maps on the watch. Suunto doesn’t update maps often. For me, the inconvenience to delete and download maps because I picked up the 4 GB version isn’t worth it 50€ spared.
The bigger problem is that Race 2 here costs 422€. If I were on the market for a new Suunto, I’d pick any time the Race 2. I know you’ll say like that one would end up with V2 but for 72€ one gets the sapphire, more detailed maps and 55 hours of dual band with the Race 2. But if one doesn’t need all those things, better off staying with Run 1. -
GratefulDeadpan
-
In one of the reviews (The Run Testers), I saw the screens andddd
the issues with the sizing of the metrics on a single line still haven’t been fixed.
-
@Highlands okay, so in my initial question regarding which storage size I should pick I did mention that I wouldn’t use any of it for music. Regarding the pita of loading maps due to travel—that is likely never happening to me either as I very rarely travel.
Thanks for helping me come to the conclusion that the 4gb version is most likely good enough for me
But I hear your point and if I needed it I would also pay for the convenience. But would rather buy the V2 for the added convenience of the flashlight in that case.
-
@GratefulDeadpan I’m glad I helped you. Still, I do believe the 64 GB version is the better, more future proof choice because 50€ is just nothing. Just because I don’t need memory today, it doesn’t mean that I won’t need more memory after 3-6 months.
As for Suunto maps: in my home area they are totally useless on my V2. They simply lack major paths and trails, not to mention the poor legibility. And as I know my area very well, I don’t need maps there. I hate to say it but in unknown terrains I rely on Fenix maps. So, if I were a user of Run 1, using it only on my territory, the less detailed maps on Run 2 wouldn’t add any additional value to my activities.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login