Suunto app Forum Suunto Community Forum
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Race 3S & Race 3 rumours

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Watches
    38 Posts 16 Posters 1.1k Views 16 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G Offline
      GratefulDeadpan @withManish
      last edited by

      @withManish if you’re referring to the R3 already being around the corner—no I absolutely do not think that makes sense. Suunto will lose my trust if they start with yearly releases.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Tami999T Offline
        Tami999 Silver Members @elbee
        last edited by

        @elbee said:

        @GratefulDeadpan said:

        @Highlands said:

        https://the5krunner.com/2026/07/28/suunto-race-3-race-3-s-leak/

        Interesting to read there that the Race 3 will have mineral glass and the Race 3S would have sapphire—making it the more premium option. If this is to be true.

        Sapphire might make a stronger watch but also harder to read. I’m happy with the clear glass on my watch, but I also know someone with a scattered forerunner 965 who wished in had a sapphire lens like the fenix 3 he had before.

        I hope Race 3 will have minreal glass. Sapphire is MUST HAVE for me. This would stop me from change Race 2 to Race 3 (tech geek here :D)

        E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E Offline
          elbee @Tami999
          last edited by

          @Tami999 said:

          I hope Race 3 will have minreal glass. Sapphire is MUST HAVE for me. This would stop me from change Race 2 to Race 3 (tech geek here :D)

          You post is slightly confusing. Do you want sapphire or are your hopes on mineral glass?

          (And why you want a race 3 when you now have a race 2 also puzzles me. You’re probably more interested in the watch part than in the sport part?)

          Suunto t3c | Suunto Ambit 3 sport | Tomtom runner 2 | Garmin forerunner 935 | Garmin forerunner 965 | Suunto race s
          Stryd | Bryton Gardia R300L | Polar H9 | Polar oh1+ | Wahoo bolt v2 | 4iiii precision 3

          Tami999T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
          • S Offline
            Stavrogin @GratefulDeadpan
            last edited by

            @GratefulDeadpan Maybe I read it wrong but he also quoted the current model as not having multi band GNSS.

            5krunner seems to be more AI using writer looking to launch an online presence fast vs a real person who puts out well thought out content. The site and his content are a bit like a tech tabloid written by AI.

            Suunto Vertical, Race, Race 2, Race S and Run. Rocking the Vertical 2 Titanium at the moment.
            Garmin: Fenix 7X, Epix Pro 51mm, Forerunner 265.
            Coros: Pace Pro, Apex 4

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • G Offline
              Goatee
              last edited by

              Subscription would kill it for me & would class it as a slippery slope towards the end for me

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tami999T Offline
                Tami999 Silver Members @elbee
                last edited by Tami999

                @elbee said:

                @Tami999 said:

                I hope Race 3 will have minreal glass. Sapphire is MUST HAVE for me. This would stop me from change Race 2 to Race 3 (tech geek here :D)

                You post is slightly confusing. Do you want sapphire or are your hopes on mineral glass?

                (And why you want a race 3 when you now have a race 2 also puzzles me. You’re probably more interested in the watch part than in the sport part?)

                Nope. Iam a lot into sport, but also my second hobby is technology. If something cool bring to Race 3, I gonna sell my Race 2 and buy Race 3, but also Sapphire glass is must-have for me, both for sport and daily wearing, which for me its easy to get scratches on bezel, and I dont trust mineral glass. Yes, its cheaper, but I never scratched sapphire in my life. I can have scratched bezel, its ok, but not a screen after 1 week.

                5krunner seems to be more AI using writer looking to launch an online presence fast vs a real person who puts out well thought out content. The site and his content are a bit like a tech tabloid written by AI.

                The whole rumors seems for me a lot what “AI” threw away via google after typing ,Race 3" by people.
                From what I’ve read this AI said Race 3 and Race 3S comming this year and compared to Race 2 with "single-band GPS" Race 3 gonna have dual-band. So we can see how we can trust these rumors… Race 2 got dual-band, like every Race/Vertical released if im not wrong.

                André FariaA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • André FariaA Offline
                  André Faria @Tami999
                  last edited by

                  kinda interesting to see the comments here. People don’t want yearly releases but also don’t want paywall, well money needs to come from somewhere…
                  On my side I would prefer to pay a fee and have the same watch with updates than having to ditch a watch and buy another, but that is me, not the mass, and not the business model that companies operate today.

                  If the features are nice, and useful for the client even if AI based, why not?
                  We don’t know how it is implemented.
                  If the features are bad, well guess they will not sell and quickly either they improve or they will see people go where the grass is greener.

                  I think suunto earned some costumers when garmin decided to not release new features to “previous gen” watches such as the 965, fenix 7 etc and also paid features that were not as good as the client using claude or chatgpt.

                  Guess they can learn from that, and still profit.
                  Let’s see what the future support for Race, Race S, Vertical 1 gives and this new race 3 brings.

                  Suunto Race S | Ambit 3 Peak Sapphie | Hammerhead Karoo 3
                  Garmin Edge 1040 Solar

                  withManishW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • Steven HambletonS Offline
                    Steven Hambleton Bronze Member
                    last edited by

                    I don’t mind a yearly hardware cycle as long as there is a trade off of faster processing or more storage.

                    But as this is a sports watch and not a smart watch, I don’t think it’s necessary to improve specs year on year.

                    The Apple Watch benefits from faster internals and more storage because the operating system demands it. Not so with Suunto watches.

                    What I would like to see is a more features for things like MP3 storage, uploads, guide creation, backups etc off the watch. So basically a back-end to manage everything on the watch in a web app as well as the mobile app.

                    Watch: Suunto Race S

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • withManishW Online
                      withManish Bronze Member @jw cou
                      last edited by

                      jw-cou It’s not about waiting for official news; it’s general feedback as an end user. I look at a 3- to 4-year lifecycle of the watch (These watches aren’t cheap; there is a $300–$400 price tag).

                      As a long-time Suunto user, I have noticed that every software update brings a new set of bugs instead of resolving old ones. A simple example: they are announcing and claiming 15 days of battery life as just a watch; I have noticed you hardly get 7 days of juice even after putting the watch in power-save mode.

                      Heart rate does not function accurately, and the same goes for oxygen measurement. They are adding more and more functionalities without even knowing the use case. Their customisation is really odd, and it won’t let the user decide what they want; it pushes what they think is correct.

                      These watches are for athletic purposes, not lifestyle watches like Apple and Samsung. I don’t see the suitability of a touchscreen when you have a very tiny screen, and that’s the main reason for battery drain.

                      It can go very long, actually. I said this before: “We are paid beta testers for all tech companies” 😁

                      www.withManish.com

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • withManishW Online
                        withManish Bronze Member @André Faria
                        last edited by

                        @André-Faria I agree with you; there is no need for a hardware update every year. Focus on technology that can last a long time, is stable and adds paid features if needed. Just like a mobile app. You announce a new watch and deliver the same issues in a different way, rather than giving solutions.

                        www.withManish.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post

                        Suunto Terms | Privacy Policy