Software update 2.39.20 (2024 Q4)
-
@Egika do you know how long it could take to implement fixed version?
I received my 9PP two days ago, first impression was great, I updated FW to the most recent and… then nightmare started:
- Sleep tracking does not work (HR 24/7 and sleep tracking enabled). First night it detected wake up with 3hrs delay, 2nd night nothing tracked.
- not all steps seems to be counted. Yesterday since morning no single step was counted till I soft restarted watch
- watch shows temperature in range 27-32 deg C. I don’t now what it suppose to mean. It is not my temperature nor environment.
I am feeling disappointed. I am asking about software update date because I still have 12 days to send it back.
-
I’m sorry for that
-
@false proper qa tests where done extensively. There was another issue that caused this.
-
Hi all. Sooner or later some beta fw will come here for the ohr issue.
Within the weekend hopefully.
-
@false Humour always explains things better
-
@false Well, and seriously speaking, the truth is that in relation to this update, as a user of 9 Peak Pro and after 3 days of using this update, I must say that it has deeply DISAPPOINTED me.
Not only has it not introduced any improvement in scope (only in the area of structured training there is a lot of room for improvement, for example) but it has brought us PROBLEMS with the operation of the HR sensor that we did not have before.
To top it off (and this is already a subjective opinion, of course) the new pseudo-carrousel type animation seems to me a great STEP BACK in DESIGN terms.
That is why, as I have already come to say, I have undone the steps and returned to the previous version. And, of course, I think I am not the only one.
-
So, to buck the trend, here’s something about a FW improvement that wasn’t mentioned in the notes
A couple months ago (https://forum.suunto.com/post/148150) when the tooth with distance to waypoint got added to the breadcrumb screen, I mentioned something about making it override the other tooth sections in the other screens.
Today was my first TBT run with the new FW, and the instructions for next turn did override the tooth, so I didn’t need to switch screens all the time, which was especially useful when turns were clustered. Fab.
However, I think it needs maybe a bit of tweaking. The behaviour was a bit tricky to understand for me to start - First of all it only overrode the tooth for densely nested turns, then reverted back to normal tooth (distance/Time in ZS etc). However, after a while, it just stayed the entire time. This is useful, however I’m missing whatever data I assigned to that part of the sport mode screen. Any chance this can be played with so it only comes in under 100m?
Otherwise it’s fantastic. Or I just adjust my custom sport modes and then it’s also fine if I don’t use the bottom tooth as I know it’ll be used.
-
My Suunto is like my old Land Rover Defender: a rugged beast, purpose-built for challenging terrain. It might not boast the latest tech or pamper you with creature comforts, but it excels at its core mission – navigating the wilderness. Do I absolutely need a Defender? Technically no, but emotionally yes. It gives me a feeling of independence and adventure.
The latest Suunto update seems to distract from the core of the product. Suddenly, it’s less about conquering the elements and more about becoming a crowd favourite. Perhaps Suunto is trying to appeal to a wider audience and to become more like its competitors, but in doing so, they risk alienating their loyal following – those who appreciate a tool honed for a specific purpose, not a jack-of-all-trades that does everything.
My Garmin (FR265), on the other hand, is like a modern SUV. It does everything well – comfortable, convenient, packed with gadgets. But it lacks the raw, unadulterated spirit of the Defender. It’s lost its soul. Don’t be like that.
I, for one, will stick to my Defender and my Suunto. They may not be perfect, but they are true to themselves. But please, redesign the menu so that I can read it without glasses, and improve the use of screen space to increase the font size and guarantee the same. Please. I will forgive you that that the structured workouts and intervals screens will be improved in a future version.
-
@Maximilian-Mustermann I totally agree , Epix2Pro still in the drawer, still believe …
-
@Maximilian-Mustermann I vote you for every single word.
-
@Dimitrios-Kanellopoulos IMHO a public beta program would be a great move.
-
@Maximilian-Mustermann Couldn’t agree more.
-
-
I’m still on 2.37.13 FW Version. After reading the issues people have with the Q3 and the Q4 FW releases, I don’t think I’ll ever upgrade mine. Nothing in the last two releases appeals to me and I consider it a downgrade especially with the changes made to complications. I’m happy with the features I currently have and I love my SV.
-
As a Software Engineer, I very well understand the nature of bugs and how unpredictable they can be. I would not complain about those. If a company has the right values, those bugs will be fixed very soon.
What is very concerning to me with this update is the focus on accessory, unnecessary features or even features that goes against the core values, such as the new festive watch faces or the new UI zoom effect.
About the festive watch faces -> Totally unnecessary. Any minute spent on this could have been better used to do something else.
UI Zoom effect -> I think is a regression over the previous scroll effect. It’s more difficult to read, disturbing to the eye. Probably even less performant than before with all those different sizes and re-draws. Maybe looks better on an OLED screen with crown (Race family) but in my Vertical looks much worse than before.Can we have the UI Zoom effect as an option in Settings?
This seems to me that those features were lead by a product manager that is not a Suunto user, that doesn’t understand what Suunto is, and/or that doesn’t understand the Suunto core user base.
As mentioned above, Suunto user base, or should I call it the “legacy” user based wants and values a good old Land Rover Defender, not a modern SUV full of bells and whistles. For that there is already loads of alternatives. I agree also with previous comment that this seems a move to become a crowd favourite. And that is a shame. And in my opinion, a very bad strategic decision.
Wondering if this is a signal of the future direction of Suunto and if is already related with the operations (including development) move away from Finland.
-
@jjorgemoura people have different tastes . I prefer the new ui scrolling and zooming . other running partners of mine also agree . Does it really change the end experience substantially ? No ! If you like the utilitarian style or not … well the scrolling is of absolute no use (especially for those who don’t care about the looks) as you probably don’t pay over 1sec of attention there … you really focus on the activity , performance and metrics .
If you are interested in the animations and stuff , well great ! -
This firmware is a lot more than green watch face color.
It has GPS improvements and great new navigation features.
Plus button lock in watch mode and so on.
Noone will die because of some days of missing optical heart rate.
But everyone is free to have their own preferences. -
@Egika said in Software update 2.39.20 (2024 Q4):
great new navigation features.
Do we know what these are? It was mentioned above that the “tooth” behavior has changed, but perhaps is a bit glitchy. For sure the turn-by-turn notification timing didn’t change (and still make no sense - turn-by-turn is currently useless on Suunto). Compass auto-calibration has been working great.
@Egika said in Software update 2.39.20 (2024 Q4):
It has GPS improvements
GNSS performance has been outstanding this week. Kudos to the team for these improvements. Here’s to hoping it continues!
-
@duffman19 you can add multiple ruler points on the watch and it will tell you the total distance.
Plus you can tap on the map and save the target as a POI.
Plus you can navigate to where you tap on the map.
Etc -
@Egika on that note of changes - what exact behaviour should occur with the tooth change vs what I observed? The only thing I can think of is that I deleted a couple of turns as superfluous after making the route initially, is there a logic behind it overriding the tooth in every scree