Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?

altcmd

@tomasbartko that’s a bit of a stretch to say it is inaccurate rather than the reality being the OHRs struggle on these workouts. By your definition Garmins and Polars also struggle so is their HRV wrong too? The logic does not add up.

@altcmd I see. I have had an opportunity to test a Coros Vertix 2 and tbh it doesn’t really struggle - have you used a Coros? I have also compared the HRV measurements with HRV on Apple Watch and it was very close. I have also compared Coros OHR to a chest strap and it was very close. I have no experience with Garmin, so I don’t care about Garmin.

Do you want to say that OHR struggles only with specific types of workouts and under specific circumstances? So when I’m doing nothing, just standing there and my watch shows a HR of 150+ thats fine? Despite that I still like using Suunto watches and will continue so.

What I don’t like is this defensive behavior where nobody can say anything negative about a Suunto watch - because this is the feeling I have right now, not only in this thread. Anyway, I don’t wan to argue with you over OHR, this was my last post here, peace…

Brad_Olwin

@tomasbartko For me the best Suunto OHR is the 9PP due to its light weight. I have tested this as well as the Vertical against an AW Ultra and a Suunto Smartsensor.
For me the Vertical is ok, the AWU almost exactly matches the belt and the S9PP is a bit worse than the AWU. The AWU is a larger watch so how Apple manages this I do not know. My main issues with the Vertical OHR are occasional drop outs and cadence locks on steep technical descents. The AWU rarely cadence locks but willl sometimes drop out (rare).

I have been testing sleep and HRV with AWU and the Vertical (yes this feature is not fully released yet but should be this fall) and found them very similar. So, I am not observing HRV issues with the Vertical.

I had a Garmin Epix2 for 8-9 mo before I sold it and the OHR was a bit better than the Vertical but no better than the 9PP and nowhere near the AWU.

For tracking without exercise, I find all the watches equivalent with no issues for me from the Vertical, S9PP or AWU. All give me the same RHR values and I might add all 3 are very close on VO2Max (that will change with the Vertical firmware update as well, the change for me provides nearly identical values but that requires the belt with the Suunto.)

Hope this helps, these are my observations and my honest feedback on these. You probably know I field test for Suunto, I think the Suunto OHR is no better or worse than Garmin but Apple is clearly superior for me above any watch I have tested. The Quantified Scientist agrees.

mikekoski490

@tomasbartko I just did an interval session on a stationary bike (Bowflex Velocore) using my Suunto HRM belt connected to it, and I wore my Vertical using OHR as a comparison.

The values generally matched whenever I checked, and at the end had the identical average heart rate value as well. As Im on a stationary bike, and not throwing my wrist around, the OHR works as expected. I definitely always use an HRM belt with the Vertical for more dynamic workouts.

Ive never used an HRM for weight training as its not really a cardio workout for me, but I do notice that OHR a bit slow to get to a more resting HR in-between sets.

altcmd

@tomasbartko sorry to hear if you took it negatively but I have had my own share of complaints and my question to you was to lay out all the facts. This you only did in your last post. I still say there are many variables that affect the OHR and if you suspect an issue, I suggest you contact Suunto and seek service.

altcmd

And as with anything, take anyone’s subjective experience including mine with a grain of salt especially when comparing other watches. We are in a Suunto Forum after all so there is some implicit bias here. Data speaks for itself.

zhang965

@altcmd said in Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?:

And as with anything, take anyone’s subjective experience including mine with a grain of salt especially when comparing other watches. We are in a Suunto Forum after all so there is some implicit bias here. Data speaks for itself.

I got very bad OHR with all S9 serie.

my vertical can provide me a good OHR after 15 to 20m Warming up, but it’s still too late for a 40m run.

My epix pro shows the exact value as my Suunto belt without warming, it really surprised me.

wakarimasen

I pretty much always use a HRM chest strap. I know it’s going to be better than any watch, so… why not

ChrisA

@Brad_Olwin that‘s my observation too. The AW compared to a H10 strap is either similar, or one to two beats off. And I also found the Vertical and different Garmins I tried very similar and also not too far off (compared to the H10). I really doubt one can say that the Vertical has a bad OHR by default.

altcmd

@ChrisA agreed and I think we are discounting a lot of other variables like positioning in the arm, skin temp, etc. that impact this. Aside from AWs, one really needs to test similar competitor watches in a like-for-like setting and environment to discern difference in OHR (assuming that is the only variable component of interest but ofcourse GPS and the like can also be checked).

e6321

@altcmd I get a lot of the evidence is not scientific but there is definitely a consistent voice around the OHR not being great. If you need more concrete evidence Rays review noted points where the OHR completely lost the plot while seemed to do well in other sections. That certainly matches my experience.

Dante Mclalla

Suunto vertical is a very good looking watch, but as to most features it lags much behind its competitors and this is a shame. Why offering OHR, blood measurement if unreliable? why pool swimming is still so wrong? why map do not contemplate street names? why the mip is so washed out (Casio GBD H2000 is a mip screen but way way better than suunto and the same Coros watches). Coros in particular is a very good example of a clear willing to improve and implement their watches through continuous firmware updates embracing all their line up and not just the latest release. Suunto does seem to think the same way. I bought the SV titanium but after 29 days of daily comparisons with a Coros and a Garmin I sent it back. That’s a pity as the SV is, in theory, an awesome watch.

BrunoH

@Dante-Mclalla In my case OHR is spot on in daily activities and sleep tracking, but my excessive sweating while exercising (sorry for too much information) tends to mess it up. I’d be happy for improvements in this area, but I’m ok with using an HR strap. Based on what I’ve read from reviews other brands suffer from not-so-perfect OHR too.

In this thread someone already mention that spO2 is a must feature from marketing perspective because every brand offers it. I find it pretty useless. Although it was funny to see very low spO2 measurement when I was feeling bad after going to scary rollercoaster… I can’t say if the result was truthful, but it correlated with my feelings.

What about pool swimming? I saw you commenting in another thread about problems with breaststroke swimming. You didn’t specify what kind of problems you encountered. My biggest problem is that my Vertical sometimes counts extra mileage whenever I need to zig-zag when there are slower swimmers or kids playing in my lane. But otherwise breaststroke works ok for me. Well, I am slow, so Vertical has time to think and observe what this fatso is doing

It is very interesting you should compare Casio GBD H2000 with Vertical. I didn’t find the exact numbers for Casio, but in every picture I saw it was a) monochrome and b) much lower resolution than Vertical. Coros display looks nice, though!

I used to have S9B and for a couple of years I did see continuous SW improvements and it wasn’t only for the newest models S9P and S9PP. I expect Suunto to keep on doing this.

In my opinion it is not very productive to get rid of your gear and then come back here listing individual features that were not to your liking and then drop random brand names that seem to be performing better in those areas. If there was a perfect watch, better than all the others in every aspect, then everyone should by that one. But I guess there is no such thing.

There are flaws in Vertical, but it is a work in progress and will improve. Feel free to complain about a couple of features, but we should look at it as a whole ecosystem, containing also the phone app, partner offerings, watch guides and watch apps. I did some comparison testing back in the day and chose Suunto because of my own personal preferences.

Your preferences are different, so good luck to you with Garmin and Coros!

Jacobus

@Dante-Mclalla It depends on how you look at it. I’ve never really thought about what you’re talking about.
When it gets cold outside I use an external heart rate belt, when it is warm the SV beats like a Swiss clock when I compare it with my heart rate belt, it even responds faster! (this also varies per person, but every brand has problems with thin wrists and cold temperatures).
the saturation value of your blood is only important if you are high in the mountains or if you are ill, otherwise it is not really important, more of a gimmick.
I use maps when I am running or walking through nature and I am not familiar with that area and then walk a pre-made route, the map works fine, just looking for a second is enough to know where to go.
When I’m walking in a city I use my phone, which is a lot more convenient than such a small screen.
It just depends on how you want to see the watch? as a sportswatch or as a smartwatch and there are indeed big differences, but it is still not a bad sports watch!

mikekoski490

@Dante-Mclalla The Casio you mentioned is a simple black and white display.

I ditched coros vertix 2 because of its terrible washed out display and fonts. S9PP was far superior, and Vertical even better, and for me the best MIPS display so far.

I guess individual experience varies.

altcmd

@mikekoski490 Indeed - I found 9PP display to be quite dull, even though it was said to be better than the 9P. SV is far better.

Needless to say, a common theme here is that the SV hardware has no equal - Suunto has put SV in a league of its own (some who are having issues with OHR bubbles will disagree and I hear you). However, majority of the headache with Suunto is related to its software. My own subjective opinion here is that the hardware and software are at opposite ends - one better than the rest while the other worse. My own opinion, so don’t bury me for this

mikekoski490

@altcmd To me the S9PP display was way better than my Coros Vertix 2 when I had them side by side for about a week before I sold the Coros.

babychai

@Dante-Mclalla In practically, Suunto is a very good GPS survival watch. So other features i don’t put high hope on that but i still wear it 24/7 except during shower.

Suunto watch help me to survive inside forest. Give me confidence to explore alone in the forest without worry getting lost.

Map without street/trail names it is fine for me because previously i rely on the breadcrumb for navigation and still able to complete my hike and run safely.

Andrew_

For what it’s worth, switching to Suunto from Garmin, I was incredibly tempted to switch back. Why you may ask? (Follow me on this…)

Garmin’s step counting is just leaps ahead of Suunto (it’s not really the technology, rather it’s just too sensitive per the existing algorithm)
// At the time, I thought seeing a step counter, that for me was 98% accurate, was helping me stay active somehow. I realized that If I’m clocking 3-5 miles a day on runs, an hour at the gym, eating right, how important is it really that I see 10,000 steps on my watch? It’s not.
Garmin’s health metrics. The sleep (when I go to sleep, wake up) were SPOT ON. It’s nice seeing how much I slept, even if I don’t care about sleep stages.
// First two days with the SV, it was WAY off when I went to sleep. I’m unsure what happened… but that third day, up to and including today, has been spot on, just like my Garmin. Again, since I don’t care for sleep stages, per se, the general picture of how long I’m sleeping is awesome. Not to mention… idk what magic Suunto is cooking, but I always wake up to ZERO steps… Garmin somehow can’t figure out how to turn steps off when the watch detects I’m sleeping… so I’d wake up to 50-200 lol.
GPS accuracy. I was a bit shocked when my trail, race course, finished with 8.15 when I’ve always finished between 7.8-8.0mi (buddies finish about the same in their Coros, and 8.3 on their Apple Watch). I thought something may be wacky with the actual system being used to mark my track and distance.
// After some research, and speaking with y’all, I realized Garmin has a few things they do that are just different. Not necessarily for the better, or the worse, just different when it comes to SatIQ. That said, it’s been SPOT ON with road courses, and I’m never going to just give up if it’s within 2% margin of error. I’m sure it’ll be just fine on other trails.
Calories burned estimation. While no watch is by any means super a accurate with this… Suunto is comically bad. I do not burn 1000 calories on a 45 min flat walk, in which I dont even break a sweat lol. Other units has estimated 100-200ish, which is much more realistic. It just bothered me… because if all this is taken into account for Suunto’s recovery, wellness alg, it’s surely not providing accurate information at a big scale.
// I then realized… wait, I don’t even care about calories from these devices, why am I getting my panties in a bunch over nothing? Again, sleep data, general heart rate trends (resting) and a place to track and log runs, workouts. That’s all I need.

What Suunto has really made me understand, and let’s be honest…appreciate, is that I don’t need a watch full of gimmicks. I need a tool, reliable, GPS, exceptional battery, MIP display and something that is durable. The fact that the Vertical is a gorgeous watch is just a bonus. Personally, I much prefer the layout of the Suunto app, and I’m eager to see future updates.

To conclude, is one watch going to be “perfect” for everyone? probably not. You just have to be realistic about your needs, and find the best fit FOR YOU.

I guess that’s my unwanted take haha. Sorry

zhang965

@Andrewx01 said in Is the Vertical as sub-standard as it seems?:

For what it’s worth, switching to Suunto from Garmin, I was incredibly tempted to switch back. Why you may ask? (Follow me on this…)

Garmin’s step counting is just leaps ahead of Suunto (it’s not really the technology, rather it’s just too sensitive per their all)
// At the time, I thought seeing a step counter, that for me was 98% accurate, was helping me stay active somehow. I realized that If I’m clocking 3-5 miles a day on runs, an hour at the gym, eating right, how important is it really that I see 10,000 steps on my watch? It’s not.

Garmin’s health metrics. The sleep (when I go to sleep, wake up) were SPOT ON. It’s nice seeing how much I slept, even if I don’t care about sleep stages.
// First two days with the SV, it was WAY off when I went to sleep. I’m unsure what happened… but that third day, up to and including today, has been spot on, just like my Garmin. Again, since I don’t care for sleep stages, per se, the general picture of how long I’m sleeping is awesome. Not to mention… idk what magic Suunto is cooking, but I always wake up to ZERO steps… Garmin somehow can’t figure out how to turn steps off when the watch detects I’m sleeping… so I’d wake up to 50-200 lol.

GPS accuracy. I was a bit shocked when my trail, race course, finished with 8.15 when I’ve always finished between 7.8-8.0mi (buddies finish about the same in their Coros, and 8.3 on their Apple Watch). I thought something may be wacky with the actual system being used to mark my track and distance.
// After some research, and speaking with y’all, I realized Garmin has a few things they do that are just different. Not necessarily for the better, or the worse, just different when it comes to SatIQ. That said, it’s been SPOT ON with road courses, and I’m never going to just give up if it’s within 2% margin of error. I’m sure it’ll be just fine on other trails.

-Calories burned estimation. While no watch is by any means super a accurate with this… Suunto is comically bad. I do not burn 1000 calories on a 45 min flat walk, in which I dont even break a sweat lol. Other units has estimated 100-200ish, which is much more realistic. It just bothered me… because if all this is taken into account for Suunto’s recovery, wellness alg, it’s surely not providing accurate information at a big scale.
// I then realized… wait, I don’t even care about calories from these devices, why am I getting my panties in a bunch over nothing? Again, sleep data, general heart rate trends (resting) and a place to track and log runs, workouts. That’s all I need.

What Suunto has really made me understand, and let’s be honest…appreciate, is that I don’t need a watch full of gimmicks. I need a tool, reliable, GPS, and something that is durable. The fact that the Vertical is a gorgeous watch is just a bonus. Personally, I much prefer the layout of the Suunto app.

Is one watch going to ever be “perfect” probably not. You just have to be realistic about your needs, and find the best fit you for.

I guess that’s my unwanted take haha. Sorry

Thanks dude, for sharing your experience with vertical.

Seriously, I never had Garmin watch in my life before vertical, and vertical gives me the envie to get a Garmin and damn they are doing well.