Suunto Vertical review from a non-target audience
-
@sartoric said in Suunto Vertical review from a non-target audience:
@Brad_Olwin said in Suunto Vertical review from a non-target audience:
o This guy is stupid,
o This guy is a liar,
o Or this guy is a stupid liar.you forgot “boomer”
Not everyone can be a proud boomer, you have to have been born at an important time in our history (USA)
-
As a kiwi I’m proud to be from the country where ‘okay boomer’ originated from, I don’t think Chloe imagined it blowing up like it did when she said it
-
@MiniForklift that was a great speech, and I’m an ocean away in Canada
-
Chloe is cool, as far as politics go she’s a breath of fresh air
-
Winners Wear Winners
-
@zhang965 It sure drifts slightly. But, regarding the offset to the south-east (which you also showed in one of your previous posts in this topic), mind that satellite layers are not always perfectly aligned. It might actually be the satellite image that has an offset here…
Lovely example can be seen here: bridge in Melbourne where two different satellite footages connect. The misalignment is approx. 10 m.
-
@zhang965 did you run constantly, without any stops?
S9PP 2.37.48
-
-
@Łukasz-Szmigiel said in Suunto Vertical review from a non-target audience:
@zhang965 did you run constantly, without any stops?
Constantly
-
@zhang965 I wonder if it would be better if you were to stop for a few seconds or change directions.
I think that there’s plenty of dead reckoning and other magic filtering going on in Sony’s GPS firmware. It seems to me that the firmware is somehow smoothing the direction error over time, which is apparent when moving constantly in non-ideal conditions (i.e. cycling in the forest).
Perhaps in your case, the signal was too weak and since you were constantly doing the same loop and turning in the same direction, the smoothing error was overlaid on each loop.
