Race 2 WF available

sorinus

@Antonello85 I have this WF in use on my Vertical and the km line is missing.

GiPFELKiND

@sorinus i thought that the dotted line is the average training time in the last 4 weeks…

sorinus

@GiPFELKiND said in Race 2 WF available:

@sorinus i thought that the dotted line is the average training time in the last 4 weeks…

Yes, I also think it’s the average of the past 4 weeks. I mean the new label in the picture above (14.3 km), which incidentally happens to be aligned with the dotted line but I don’t think they are connected.

kriskus

This is the km distance in the current week. If you haven’t run yet then it’s not displayed.

sorinus

@kriskus said in Race 2 WF available:

This is the km distance in the current week. If you haven’t run yet then it’s not displayed.

I did run, and it’s not there.

kriskus

@sorinus But you are looking at the running chart, right? Normally you have one graph with overall activity duration with no distance shown and when you click it switches to the other graph with the longest duration activity (e.g. running or cycling etc.).

safari

@kriskus
To test it out, I did both walking and cycling on Sunday. Cycling was by far the longest, but the second screen still showed the walk.

sorinus

@kriskus said in Race 2 WF available:

@sorinus But you are looking at the running chart, right?

Oh this is new for me and you are right! Thanks!

kriskus

@safari I guess it takes the total from the last week or even the last four weeks. For me it just changed from cycling to running and this is about right. BTW - funny that we have to guess how it works based on our experience and it is not described anywhere.

Antonello85

I am double checking and I am pretty sure it is taking the most frequent sport of the last 4 weeks, because last week I have just run (no trail running) but I am still getting the trail run sport in the chart.
And I have only the time spent (= 0 hours) and not the line with the kilometer because it shows-up only if different than 0.

Thanks for the explanation

Steven Hambleton

@Antonello85 I have it