New owner of Suunto Race - first feelings

David l

@jannis just the standard update we all received when the watch arrive.

Hwolfff

@BrunoH thanks.
So the textile strap is the main problem? Not the round button thing?

Hwolfff

@thanasis thanks I’ll try that.

BrunoH

@Hwolfff well nothing is certain, but that’s usually the reason. A fresh battery wouldn’t hurt either. I once had problems with a battery which was unused but expired.

martintrail

Today I had my first SR crash during a workout and since I’ve been using the Suunto for years. Fortunately during a workout and not a run :-D. There was also an erasure of the elevation history on the watch face :-(. It’s annoying and I hope it doesn’t happen again. Can this be prevented e.g. by periodically restarting the watch to empty the cache?

Egika

@martintrail no need to periodically restart.
Probably next week Race will receive an update that fixes many rare but serious bugs.

OnlyoneKenobi

Hello community and happy holidays.

For Christmas I gave the Race to my son and I must say that I really liked it.
Before singing its praises, I’ll immediately say what I don’t like, the same goes for the vertical, The strap is too short. It would have been better to add a second length to the package or give the possibility to choose the most appropriate size. I add a note, hoping it will be implemented, the lack of emojis. My students often respond with emojis and I wish I didn’t have to reach for the phone.
Well moving on to the advantages I would definitely say the screen which is fantastic. The battery is still early but, apart from the first few days where it ran out quickly due to the various updates and settings, at the moment I have a daily consumption of 5% without sporting activities with HF activated 24 hours and notifications. During bike rides I consume around 3% per hour. OHR works very well on me, the differences with the chest heart rate monitor are marginal, in the order of one or two beats.
When it comes to step counting, it underestimates about 25%. To give an example, yesterday my bionic knee after a walk showed 8200 steps and the Race only 6300. Not bad, also because no watch is capable of being truly precise, I believe the data serves only as a suggestion, nothing more .
In light of all this I would say super promoted, so much so that I exchanged it with my son who prefers the Vertical longer battery life and I the better visibility of the AMOLED screen.

Luis Andés Olmedo

Hello everyone, I want to share my opinion about the Race after a month with it. First, a bit of history: I’ve been a user of training watches since 2003. I had one of those Garmins with huge AA batteries, and at some point, I ended up with a Suunto Ambit 3. Back then, Suunto was the reliable and reference brand for mountain activities, while Garmin was lagging behind.

That Suunto Ambit is the watch that lasted the longest for me (3 years) because, although I like to change and try new things, there wasn’t anything interesting for me at that time. Later, I switched to a Spartan for a very short time and ended up with Garmin. Over the years, I’ve had the F3, F5, F5x, F6, F6x, and F7. Garmin is (and this is my opinion) reliable and constantly improves functionalities. I always kept a close eye on SUUNTO (they’ve always had the most attractive designs), but the fact that they didn’t have maps placed them far behind other brands.

Until the Vertical came along, and I had to try it (incredible screen, amazing maps, incredible design, incredibly comfortable). However, I sold it shortly afterward. I couldn’t get used to a heart rate sensor that was 2 or 3 generations behind the competition and the instability of the firmware (it froze on me twice). So, I went back to Garmin.

And then came the Race. I did a lot of research, knowing that the heart rate sensor is the same as the Vertical, I decided to give it a try. After 1 month, I can say that I’m quite pleased. The visibility of the maps is impressive (much better than the competition), the design is undoubtedly (for me) the most beautiful on the market, the crown makes it easy to navigate, it’s very comfortable, the battery lasts me 15 days training 6 days a week with GPS, and the screen is incredible… not to mention the price, of course, a decisive factor compared to the competition.

Does it have flaws? Yes, of course. The most serious one is the Optical Heart Rate (OHR) sensor. I still don’t understand how a brand like SUUNTO includes a heart rate sensor like that in watches priced from 400€ to 700€, especially considering what the competition offers. The screens during structured training sessions are very difficult to read (text is very small), and there are some other issues… but I must say that the visibility of the screen, the maps, the design, and the comfort compensate for it (for now).

Hi Everyone

Practicing running, hiking, gravel and mountain biking, I have been using GPS watches for quite a few years now.
Fervent user of Garmin from the Fénix 3 to the Epix Ben 2 since the beginning with a 6 month infidelity with Coros following the breakdown of my last Epix.
I have always looked with interest at Suunto watches. First of all, I have always loved design but I had never taken the time to change my training and usage habitudes.
I was ready to take the plunge when the vertical was announced but not being able to create complex training sessions, I abstained.
The race arrived and so I gave in at the beginning of December 2023 with the aim of doing my 2024 sporting season with this watch on my wrist.
Since sleep and HRV tracking technology came out, I wear my watches 24 hours a day. (I replaced the watch to the other wrist when I stay at the office to let it rest)

First of all, I immediately found the Suunto application very easy to use. The data is clear and easily usable, well done for the work! The sleep tracking worked well, the HRV too but it was always lower than on my other watches (Garmin 33 on average, for Suunto 48 and 46 for coros).
During my running training sessions, I missed the beeps announcing the change of sequence as well as the repetition number. For the rest, everything was ok except the heart rate sensor.
From the start, I encountered difficulties. He showed me completely crazy values during the day. The night and sitting at my desk without moving, the value was ok (between 45 and 55). On the other hand, when moving, it is impossible to stabilize it with peaks at 120bpm. For training and sporting activities, I wear a heart rate belt.
I tried everything, tightening the bracelet more (to the point of leaving a nice red mark), a soft reset, two contacts with the Suunto chat, nothing solved the problem.
This generated completely false energy expenditure and recovery values.

The watch returned to the store and they replaced it with a new one: same problem with the sensor.
I made the decision to sell it with a strong feeling of disappointment.

I don’t know what to do, continue with a new Vertical….

Here is my feedback from the Race.

Brad_Olwin

@Fizzgig The OHR does not work well for me when running or skiing. I use a belt for those exercises. For plyometrics and 24/7 recording when not exercising the OHR works well and matches an Apple Watch. For some the OHR does not work well and that might be your case unfortunately. I doubt the Vertical will be any better for you but I am surprised it does not work when you are not exercising.

GiPFELKiND

@Brad_Olwin Hey Brad good Morning! Did the Ohr Sensor Work good for you in normal day Situation? I Sometimes have Problem that my heart rate is measuring about 145 BPM when i sit on my Couch or driving my car. But when i make measurement with palpitation in my Arteria radialis backside from my wrist i exactly get the half bpm and that is my correct measurement. Also i have a heart from 72 but my watch shows often the double number in this cases 145… Any good Option to solve this?

@Brad_Olwin

I used a belt to for all my exercises. For daily tracking, I rely on the watch’s sensor. It worked more or less correctly seated but as soon as the arm moves (walking, moving, etc…) the sensor panics and indicates false additional values and up to 120 bpm/m seated for more than one hour at my office. In the car, it’s the same. When driving, the sensor gives the correct value. As soon as I go out, he gets carried away. The app’s cardiac tracking line resembles a roller coaster. I put my wife’s Aw on the other wrist to check, it showed me between 52 and 55 sitting while the Race 110. I think it is a sensor generation problem ( too old compared to new sensors form apple, Garmin, coros, etc…) I even compared with a pace 2 and it gives the right values.

It’s a shame because otherwise, the watch is pretty and works well. Spending so much money to get additionally distorted monitoring is not normal. A simple update should not fix the problem since it is hardware related.

Luis Andés Olmedo

@Fizzgig said in New owner of Suunto Race - first feelings:

Hi Everyone

Practicing running, hiking, gravel and mountain biking, I have been using GPS watches for quite a few years now.
Fervent user of Garmin from the Fénix 3 to the Epix Ben 2 since the beginning with a 6 month infidelity with Coros following the breakdown of my last Epix.
I have always looked with interest at Suunto watches. First of all, I have always loved design but I had never taken the time to change my training and usage habitudes.
I was ready to take the plunge when the vertical was announced but not being able to create complex training sessions, I abstained.
The race arrived and so I gave in at the beginning of December 2023 with the aim of doing my 2024 sporting season with this watch on my wrist.
Since sleep and HRV tracking technology came out, I wear my watches 24 hours a day. (I replaced the watch to the other wrist when I stay at the office to let it rest)

First of all, I immediately found the Suunto application very easy to use. The data is clear and easily usable, well done for the work! The sleep tracking worked well, the HRV too but it was always lower than on my other watches (Garmin 33 on average, for Suunto 48 and 46 for coros).
During my running training sessions, I missed the beeps announcing the change of sequence as well as the repetition number. For the rest, everything was ok except the heart rate sensor.
From the start, I encountered difficulties. He showed me completely crazy values during the day. The night and sitting at my desk without moving, the value was ok (between 45 and 55). On the other hand, when moving, it is impossible to stabilize it with peaks at 120bpm. For training and sporting activities, I wear a heart rate belt.
I tried everything, tightening the bracelet more (to the point of leaving a nice red mark), a soft reset, two contacts with the Suunto chat, nothing solved the problem.
This generated completely false energy expenditure and recovery values.

The watch returned to the store and they replaced it with a new one: same problem with the sensor.
I made the decision to sell it with a strong feeling of disappointment.

I don’t know what to do, continue with a new Vertical….

Here is my feedback from the Race.

I completely agree with your statements about the OHR… I had the vertical before the Race and the OHR behaviour is more or less the same (bad).

In my opinion you have two options: use a chest belt or move to Garmin again.

Highlands

@Luis-Andés-Olmedo Used to have 9PP and the oHR never worked well for me. In November I bought the Suunto Race and recently gifted the 9PP to my brother. He said that the oHR doesn’t work well for him either. On my Race the oHR works even worse for me than the one of 9PP.

Luis Andés Olmedo

@Highlands as I mentioned in my previous post, it’s a matter of being aware that the optical heart rate (OHR) sensor on the vertical/race doesn’t work well. For whatever reason, SUUNTO has decided to include that sensor, and we as customers can decide whether it’s not important (currently, the other advantages of the Race outweigh the sensor’s malfunction for me, and I accept it) or if it is. It’s true that the watch calculates many metrics based on heart rate, so all of them will be inaccurate. If that is important to you, either use a chest strap or switch to another brand with a good OHR.

Highlands

@Luis-Andés-Olmedo Agreed. I just wanted to mention here that I’m one of the users for whom the oHR doesn’t work well. Before I bought the SR I knew the sensor was the same, so I hadn’t had any positive expectations about it and still I bought the watch. More or less I like the watch. It’s a good product.

Tieutieu

@Luis-Andés-Olmedo @Highlands fully agree with you.
I had no expectations on OHR except for daily and night tracking (where it works just fine).
Anyone who choose any brand with hight OHR expectations propably expose himself to high disappointment.
Even if OHR (of any brands) work sometimes “well” for some people, nobody that want to use HR for training should rely on OHR. It is never as precise as a chest strap, for now.
I find boring that we have all the time the same feedback about OHR that “doesn’t work well”.
But I guess it is the power of marketing that make us believe that OHR is “just greal all the time”…

@Tieutieu

The reliability of cardiac sensors is known not to be “reliable” data, a small margin of error is considered acceptable. In this case, it’s a complete crash. The data communicated by the watch are all incorrect when considering the heart values. I like the design of Suunto, the application is great but I can’t spend 550 euros on a sports tool that gives totally crazy values. Reading all the reviews, everyone is unanimous with the race and the vertical (myself included) These are excellent watches but the sensor is frankly not up to par.

Tieutieu

@Fizzgig you’re right, but not everybody has such trash values…also I have plenty of friends using other brands and very recent watches that have the same issues.

Tieutieu

Probably Suunto’s ohr are not the best on the market, but I don’t think there are any reliable statistics that prove it.