Race vs Garmin Epix Pro
-
@wmichi oh okay. I guess the timeout is much longer than I’m used to with Garmin? I set my timeout on the Epix to as short as possible, and the Race screen just kept shining until I just stopped looking at it haha, I therefore thought it never dims. It must be really good at knowing when I am going to look at it!
-
@Shuhite Guess not, my experience with the Epix2 was with normal use I could not achieve those battery estimates either. I almost always use routes when racing or long trips as I need them and maps. That severely impacts Garmin battery life. However, on the positive side they do offer features that Suunto does not have and are incredibly versatile for setting up screen metrics.
-
@taziden He was correct and I fixed my post, was responding and inadvertently wrote the Pro afterwards as that was the post topic. I thank @pavel-samokha for the sweet silence. Amazes me how he (zhang365) has the time to burn…
-
@Brad_Olwin Yea, I’m not on your 100 mile level, (how do you even train for that?) but I was able to barely do a 48km hike while using maps a lot, because there were a lot of trail intersections. I would estimate it cut the expected battery life by around 30% compared to when we started. Got close to thinking the watch would die that day (I did not start at 100% battery).
-
@Shuhite You train just like you run a 100 mile race…it is simple really and how my wife puts it. “you just put one foot in front of the other until you are done”. She is a more talented athlete than I, National Champion in Dog Agility and she is not wrong with that statement.
-
@Shuhite Yeah, the gesture to fully light up the display works really good on the Suunto Race!
-
@Todd-Danielczyk said in Race vs Garmin Epix Pro:
. The fact that they steer buyers to models based off features or paid subscriptions (like Apple) is a game I am not willing to play.I really don’t have an issue with either.
The reality is that to develop systems, to create new features metrics etc that all costs money. if I don’t want/need those features, why should I pay for a more expensive watch that has them when I don’t need them.
In a similar way have no issues with subscriptions either - as long as its clear what its for. You add in the cost of the sub to the price and then do a comparison.Reality is that even suunto has done the pay for features model - everyone does this including coros, suunto etc. Suunto recently had a variety of different suunto 9 ,models, a Suunto 5, a suunto 3 - all a different prices with different features. Didn’t look much at the S5P and S5Peak Pro and the S9P and S9PP but will to bet they aren’t the same price and have slightly different feaures whether hardware software etc. Same with Race and Vertical - while quite similar there are hardware and likely software features -and there is a difference in price.
This is normal and should be celebrated.My issue with it where there shouldn’t be a distinction i.e. with Garmin - the health features - there should be no distinction across models unless the hardware can’t support it (i.e. ECG) - but see no reason why they can’t all run the same sleep algorithims, HRV status etc (should have been rolled out to venu 2 for example); and smilarly there are some really weird ones like the omission of training readiness for FR255 - could understand when Instinct 2 didn’t have it, but it got it in an update but FR255 still doesn’t have it - why not - and no hardware reason it couldn’t/ and can’t see a price varitation or any other reason why it shouldn’t. Can understand and agree why the health watches venu 3 / vivoactive 5 shouldn’t (but in recent update its interesting to see how that line is being blurred with venu 3 and latest beta updates including wrist running power and wrist running dynamics (though can’t see on watch only post activity in app) - what I would consider fitness not health and thus shouldn’t be on the venu 3 - but understand it from price point and competative edge (up against samsung and apple which offers variants of these - so makes sense that if want to compete need to offer similar - but then there is FR265… uggghhhh - and this is where garmin gets in a mess but not remaining consistent).
-
So since the SR I got seemed to have some physical defects, I ended up returning it, intending to see what the new update this week brings and perhaps rebuy. However, I am in Canada, where taxes are extra. Suunto refunded me really fast after I shipped the unit back using their label…
Except they only refunded me the pre-tax amount. Tried using their chat function to contact support on Tuesday (day after Armistice Day stat), but website said chat was unavailable on a public holiday, which it wasn’t in Canada. At least not BC. So I contact them on Instagram, they respond a couple hours later saying to email support-en@suunto.com with the order number. I did that immediately, but today is like the third day since then with no response…
This really isn’t helping my confidence to get another one and hope it’s not defective. What’s the support turnaround time with Suunto? With Garmin chat it’s like a couple min at most. Never had to resort to email or calls.
-
@Shuhite I am from Canada as well, and had to return my first Race (defective crown). I had the same experience–I received the refund quickly after shipping it back, and like you it was for the pre-tax amount. I used the chat (I try to use it in the morning). I had them create a ticket about it (and asked for the ticket number–in my experience then don’t volunteer the ticket number). I had heard nothing back after a couple days after the initial chat, so I nagged them again citing the ticket number. The next day I received the for the tax portion too.
-
What’s bluetooth version in Sunto Race?
-
E Egika referenced this topic on
